home

Wednesday Morning Open Thread

I have a very busy 3 days ahead. So I won't be around much during the day. But the victorious legal warrior J walks again amongst us mere mortals so I am sure she, with TChris and Ethan, will have plenty of interesting things to say.

This is an Open Thread.

< Jeff Sessions as Ranking Republican on Judiciary | Report: 98 Detainees Died in U.S Custody >
  • The Online Magazine with Liberal coverage of crime-related political and injustice news

  • Contribute To TalkLeft


  • Display: Sort:
    Suffolk County NY... (5.00 / 1) (#2)
    by kdog on Wed May 06, 2009 at 10:23:00 AM EST
    recruiting Orwellian Junior Spies to become paid informants via text messaging.  Link

    Glad cell phones hadn't taken off yet when I was in high school....damn.

    Perfect for a (none / 0) (#13)
    by SOS on Wed May 06, 2009 at 11:17:04 AM EST
    post consumption oriented culture that honors charm, fascination and likability.

    Parent
    NY v.s. Boston (5.00 / 1) (#31)
    by CST on Wed May 06, 2009 at 11:40:05 AM EST
    Newspaper edition.

    Frankly, I find the idea that the times can shut down the globe to be pretty horrendous.

    Especially considering they turned down offers to buy the paper just a few years ago.

    They appear to have reached a deal though.  Thank goodness.

    I really want the times bought out.  I don't know who would do it, but they need to get out of the Boston newspaper business.

    I was wondering how this (none / 0) (#89)
    by ruffian on Wed May 06, 2009 at 02:43:33 PM EST
    new deal with Amazon for the new large format Kindle DX will affect the fortunes of the Globe, and the Times too of course. Both the Times and the Globe are in the first release. Maybe the Globe will get a new lease on life.

    Parent
    Tenaha, TX Police target minorities for seizures (5.00 / 0) (#36)
    by Yman on Wed May 06, 2009 at 11:44:46 AM EST
    I did a quick search, but didn't find anything on TL about this.

    Frankly, I hope this is something the DOJ is looking at, rather than simply leaving it to this civil suit and/or TX authorities.

    Sorry (none / 0) (#38)
    by Yman on Wed May 06, 2009 at 11:45:45 AM EST
    Legalized theft... (none / 0) (#91)
    by kdog on Wed May 06, 2009 at 02:50:51 PM EST
    the state is quite good at that...some racket.

    Parent
    Gay marriage in (5.00 / 4) (#56)
    by dk on Wed May 06, 2009 at 12:15:37 PM EST
    Maine!  Yet one more reason why New England rocks.

    Gov. John Baldacci (5.00 / 1) (#81)
    by Capt Howdy on Wed May 06, 2009 at 01:45:12 PM EST
    In the past, I opposed gay marriage while supporting the idea of civil unions. I have come to believe that this is a question of fairness and of equal protection under the law, and that a civil union is not equal to civil marriage.


    Parent
    What's up (none / 0) (#87)
    by CST on Wed May 06, 2009 at 02:32:58 PM EST
    with Rhode Island?

    No marriage, but don't worry, you'll probably be able to get a divorce...

    Bizarre.

    Their economy could use any kind of boost right now, considering they are one of the worse off states right now.  Cmon Rhode Island, jump on the bandwagon!

    Parent

    Breaking: Gay Marriage Opponent Topless Photos Lea (5.00 / 0) (#75)
    by Wile ECoyote on Wed May 06, 2009 at 01:30:33 PM EST
    Photo here

    Interesting... (5.00 / 1) (#109)
    by MileHi Hawkeye on Wed May 06, 2009 at 04:40:51 PM EST
    New research shows young Americans are dramatically less likely to go to church -- or to participate in any form of organized religion -- than their parents and grandparents...

    ...Historically, the percentage of Americans who said they had no religious affiliation (pollsters refer to this group as the "nones") has been very small -- hovering between 5 percent and 10 percent. However, Putnam says the percentage of "nones" has now skyrocketed to between 30 percent and 40 percent among younger Americans.

    Link

    As a reformed Catholic, looks like I was ahead of my time.

    Sausage class pays off (5.00 / 1) (#124)
    by nycstray on Wed May 06, 2009 at 09:14:56 PM EST
    Welp, I've got an excellent pot of split pea and chorizo soup finishing up on the stove. O.M.G. tasting GOOD! I was really happy the guy had us make chorizo last night as it was one that I wanted to learn. We got to bring home a pound and I was all happy because I had seen so many recipes in  my searches that asked for it. Turns out I didn't bookmark them, so I went to search my fav sites. Now I'm remembering greens and chorizo recipes and such because the recipes I remember came up while looking for more things to do with my CSA share. Well when I searched the first site with the word "chorizo", first 2 were recipes for making it, third was split pea soup made with chorizo. Me very happy!!!! Only thing I added to the recipe was fresh cilantro in the last 20 min and I'll garnish with it. Happy camper here! Man, a half pound of chorizo (2 sausages to 1lb peas + 8 cups stock) can really turn a split pea soup into something else! What fun! I'm really excited to get into making other sausages and even experimenting with flavors that could be good for flavoring meals/dishes where you don't really need much. Aka, using little meat, but getting the full flavor of what you can do with it.

    {happy dance}

    if you have good conrtol (none / 0) (#1)
    by Capt Howdy on Wed May 06, 2009 at 10:14:31 AM EST
    According to Huff Post, (none / 0) (#3)
    by oculus on Wed May 06, 2009 at 10:28:46 AM EST
    Bristol and Levi on TV (different channels?) re abstinence.  She is advocating it and he is saying her brand doesn't work.  Duh.  Ain't life interesting?

    I wonder (none / 0) (#4)
    by Capt Howdy on Wed May 06, 2009 at 10:38:20 AM EST
    if he is aware that he had something to do with "her brand not working"


    Parent
    My first thought: who is (4.00 / 3) (#5)
    by oculus on Wed May 06, 2009 at 10:42:00 AM EST
    watching the baby?

    Parent
    Life doesn't matter after 9 months (5.00 / 1) (#7)
    by samtaylor2 on Wed May 06, 2009 at 10:54:50 AM EST
    Didn't you know that :)

    Parent
    Inspector Gadget, was that too (5.00 / 1) (#14)
    by oculus on Wed May 06, 2009 at 11:18:35 AM EST
    retro for you?

    Parent
    No, it was an uncalled for swipe (2.00 / 1) (#15)
    by Inspector Gadget on Wed May 06, 2009 at 11:20:55 AM EST
    at a young mother.

    Parent
    Not really. Both mom and dad (none / 0) (#18)
    by oculus on Wed May 06, 2009 at 11:24:41 AM EST
    are on the TV circuit apparently.  

    Parent
    I really just don't understand what (5.00 / 1) (#27)
    by Inspector Gadget on Wed May 06, 2009 at 11:34:29 AM EST
    Bristol and Levi did to any of the adults who think it is clever, or necessary to constantly criticize them.

    Parent
    If you can't stand the heat (5.00 / 3) (#35)
    by CST on Wed May 06, 2009 at 11:43:31 AM EST
    get out of the kitchen.

    They are putting themselves forth as public figures.  No one is forcing them to go on tv.

    I reserve the right to criticize anyone who is publicly advocating abstinence as a public policy option.

    Parent

    amen (5.00 / 0) (#37)
    by Capt Howdy on Wed May 06, 2009 at 11:45:13 AM EST
    Although (none / 0) (#43)
    by CST on Wed May 06, 2009 at 11:56:53 AM EST
    Having now read what she said, I don't think it's all bad.

    "If you're going to have sex, I think you should have safe sex," the unwed, teenage mother said as she held her infant son, Tripp. "And, regardless of what I did or anything like that, I think that abstinence is the only 100 percent foolproof way of preventing teen pregnancy."

    From cnn, emphasis mine.  I have not watched the interviews.

    Parent

    Sounds like a sensible statement. (none / 0) (#73)
    by sarcastic unnamed one on Wed May 06, 2009 at 01:28:30 PM EST
    I think they are a little (none / 0) (#29)
    by Capt Howdy on Wed May 06, 2009 at 11:36:08 AM EST
    overexposed.

    Parent
    I'm not really criticizing them. I think (none / 0) (#59)
    by oculus on Wed May 06, 2009 at 12:22:59 PM EST
    they are being taken advantage of by the media.

    Parent
    Well, (5.00 / 1) (#17)
    by bocajeff on Wed May 06, 2009 at 11:21:49 AM EST
    I'm sure they just put out a bowl of water and a bowl of kibble. Or just hired a babysitter. Or family. Or something like that...

    Parent
    Bristol was on the Today Show this AM (none / 0) (#32)
    by easilydistracted on Wed May 06, 2009 at 11:40:29 AM EST
    with baby and accompanied by pappy Todd.

    Parent
    One Dollar (none / 0) (#45)
    by CDN Ctzn on Wed May 06, 2009 at 11:57:36 AM EST
    and a Bus Locker.

    Parent
    I wonder if she... (3.50 / 2) (#8)
    by kdog on Wed May 06, 2009 at 10:56:09 AM EST
    knows the definition of abstinence.

    Parent
    It takes (none / 0) (#80)
    by cal1942 on Wed May 06, 2009 at 01:43:07 PM EST
    two to tango.

    Parent
    Interesting (none / 0) (#6)
    by CST on Wed May 06, 2009 at 10:54:24 AM EST
    I recall an earlier interview where she said "abstinence only" is not a realistic option.  Guess she changed her mind.

    Parent
    Something tells me that (5.00 / 2) (#40)
    by Anne on Wed May 06, 2009 at 11:54:50 AM EST
    since they seem to be involved in a contentious situation - which is being aided and abetted by the media, by the way - this may be a case of each being determined (in their immaturity) to take the opposite side on everything, even when it doestn't make sense.  

    I have no idea what kind of parents these two people are, but I do know that they are doing themselves and their child no favors by keeping the media well-supplied with red meat.  Seems like there should be some involvement by responsible and mature adult family members, at least, to counsel them to get out of the spotlight and focus on their child in positive ways - but maybe there just aren't any.  Or maybe they have tried to no avail.  Which is also pretty sad, either way.

    What happened to Bristol and Levi happens to far too many young people, making it obvious that abstinence is not a reliable method for preventing pregnancy in teenagers with raging hormones; it's too bad the reproductive system kicks into gear long before the brain has matured enough to handle the consequences of using the equipment (and some never do, it seems).

    Parent

    Maybe one or both of their parents (none / 0) (#119)
    by sallywally on Wed May 06, 2009 at 07:59:52 PM EST
    want them in the spotlight....

    Parent
    hindsight (none / 0) (#9)
    by Capt Howdy on Wed May 06, 2009 at 11:01:10 AM EST
    20:20

    Parent
    I'm hoping their 15 minutes of fame (none / 0) (#10)
    by oculus on Wed May 06, 2009 at 11:05:24 AM EST
    is close to done.

    Parent
    unfortunately (none / 0) (#12)
    by Capt Howdy on Wed May 06, 2009 at 11:07:29 AM EST
    I dont think we have seen the last of Sara or her family.

    Parent
    Mama (none / 0) (#11)
    by Capt Howdy on Wed May 06, 2009 at 11:06:48 AM EST
    you cant watch the entire 3 minute movie at the link.
    it is singularly freaky.  make sure you have the sound up and I recommend full screen-----

    Guillermo del Toro is in talks to produce and mentor commercial director Andres Muschietti's horror film Mama for Universal, according to RiskyBiz.  Andy is writing the English-language screenplay with his sister and producer Barbra. The movie will be based on their acclaimed Spanish-language short film Mama, which traveled the European festival circuit last year. The short film told the story of Victoria and Lily, two girls who are go on the run from a ghostly woman in a Gothic home.

    JoBlo has gotten their hands on the original short film, which I've embedded after the jump. The majority of the 3-minute film appears to take place in one single camera take (although, I'm sure that it was seamlessly stitched together like some of the segments of Children of Men). I highly recommend you check it out.


    the governator speaks (none / 0) (#16)
    by Capt Howdy on Wed May 06, 2009 at 11:21:06 AM EST
    Governor asks: What if pot's legal and taxed?

    As California struggles to find cash, Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger said Tuesday it's time to study whether to legalize and tax marijuana for recreational use.

    Bet he could skip the study part (5.00 / 1) (#19)
    by Inspector Gadget on Wed May 06, 2009 at 11:24:42 AM EST
    and just use the many that have most likely already been done.

    I'm sorry to see he looks at this as a revenue issue rather than a judicial one, though. All the lives that were ruined, were ruined through the decision to make the product illegal.


    Parent

    its like the death penalty debate (5.00 / 1) (#20)
    by Capt Howdy on Wed May 06, 2009 at 11:25:41 AM EST
    Im for whatever works.

    Parent
    Tax for recreational use? I (none / 0) (#21)
    by oculus on Wed May 06, 2009 at 11:25:46 AM EST
    predict a huge upswing in medical MJ written permission slips.

    Parent
    I doubt it (none / 0) (#22)
    by Capt Howdy on Wed May 06, 2009 at 11:26:59 AM EST
    everyone I know who want one of those already have it.  they are not at all hard to come by.


    Parent
    what I mean is (none / 0) (#24)
    by Capt Howdy on Wed May 06, 2009 at 11:28:36 AM EST
    for all practical purposes it has already been legalized for recreational use.
    there is a list of Drs on the NORML website who will give you a script.

    Parent
    Speak of the devil... (none / 0) (#66)
    by kdog on Wed May 06, 2009 at 12:56:48 PM EST
    the glaucoma is killing me today:)

    What a joke the games we must play to live free are.

    Parent

    here in Venice (none / 0) (#110)
    by otherlisa on Wed May 06, 2009 at 04:41:48 PM EST
    I am astounded at the number of medical marijuana dispensaries in the neighborhood.

    I think I mentioned the one on the boardwalk featuring girls in bikinis enticing you to "come upstairs and get high legally."

    I'm totally in favor of legalization, for medical, recreational, whatever. What we have now is absurd.

    Parent

    It strikes me as odd the CDC (none / 0) (#23)
    by oculus on Wed May 06, 2009 at 11:27:04 AM EST
    cares how many households have only cell phones--no land line.  AP

    I can come up with at least one reason (5.00 / 1) (#25)
    by andgarden on Wed May 06, 2009 at 11:31:02 AM EST
    why they would care: cord cutters are disproportionately under 30. I don't think I know a single person my age who has a landline.

    I think that has implications for public health surveys.

    Parent

    I don't have a landline, which friends (none / 0) (#26)
    by oculus on Wed May 06, 2009 at 11:32:37 AM EST
    in my age group think is a very dangerous decision.  So far, so good!

    Parent
    why? (none / 0) (#28)
    by Capt Howdy on Wed May 06, 2009 at 11:34:45 AM EST
    I am weeeeell over 30 and I have not had a land line in 10 years.

    Parent
    Land lines are how 911 calls know where (5.00 / 1) (#30)
    by coast on Wed May 06, 2009 at 11:36:59 AM EST
    you are calling from without the pers actually having to give the address.  If you only have a cell, emergency operators don't know where you are calling from and can not send you assistance unless you can give them an address.

    Parent
    Because the landlines are regulated (5.00 / 1) (#33)
    by Fabian on Wed May 06, 2009 at 11:41:00 AM EST
    and were created partly with an eye to national security - much like our transportation grid.  As a result, the land line system is robust, especially compared to wireless communications.  

    In the event of a major crisis, the relatively fragile and aging cell phone infrastructure is easily damaged or overwhelmed.  For daily use - being land line free is not a problem.  For emergencies, I [heart] my land line.  No batteries to charge.  It's always there, reliable.

    Parent

    In 2004 (5.00 / 4) (#70)
    by jbindc on Wed May 06, 2009 at 01:26:00 PM EST
    When the Midwest was hit by the huge blackout that then went to the east coast, landlines were a godsend.  Cell phones didn't work, but the landlines did, so it worked great for emergencies and to tell loved ones you were ok.  Cell phone service was out for a few days.

    THAT'S why I have both.

    Parent

    Landlines (5.00 / 1) (#84)
    by cal1942 on Wed May 06, 2009 at 02:00:55 PM EST
    originated so that people could make calls.  

    Here looong before cellular technology.

    Parent

    Well, if I were to get a landline (none / 0) (#44)
    by andgarden on Wed May 06, 2009 at 11:57:15 AM EST
    it would essentially serve as an expensive form of safety insurance. It would be hundreds more a year.

    Parent
    That's right. And its just like any (none / 0) (#57)
    by easilydistracted on Wed May 06, 2009 at 12:17:58 PM EST
    insurance, regardless of the type, there's seemingly no financial justification whatsoever -- until you need it.

    Parent
    My apartment has a house phone (5.00 / 1) (#58)
    by andgarden on Wed May 06, 2009 at 12:21:21 PM EST
    to the front desk and I have lots of neighbors. I figure thats "good enough."

    Parent
    I'd say you're in good shape. (5.00 / 1) (#61)
    by easilydistracted on Wed May 06, 2009 at 12:30:43 PM EST
    The only time I wished I still had a (5.00 / 2) (#34)
    by oculus on Wed May 06, 2009 at 11:42:49 AM EST
    land line was when I couldn't find my cell and couldn't call it.  

    Parent
    Making a land line essential (5.00 / 2) (#83)
    by cal1942 on Wed May 06, 2009 at 01:57:11 PM EST
    for the absent minded.  Were it not for a landline I'd have bought many new cell phones.

    Parent
    As info, I resided in the Houston area several (5.00 / 1) (#39)
    by easilydistracted on Wed May 06, 2009 at 11:51:59 AM EST
    years ago and hurricane emergency evacuation instructions were issued to residential areas via calls to land-based telephones in the relevant areas. Emergency preparedness groups made follow-up calls to only land based phones. Several reasons for this from what I heard (1) calls could be targeted only to the impacted areas and (2) cell phones are somewhat unreliable in mass emergencies because the networks become clogged.  

    Parent
    San Diego area set up emergency (5.00 / 1) (#46)
    by oculus on Wed May 06, 2009 at 12:00:51 PM EST
    notification to cell phones.  Burden is on the cell phone user to sign up on line.

    Parent
    That's a darn good idea and Houston (5.00 / 1) (#52)
    by easilydistracted on Wed May 06, 2009 at 12:09:58 PM EST
    was kicking that idea around for a while. One major problem was folks moving out of the area but not removing themselves from the list. Area code portability is the issue. For example, I now reside 300 miles from Houston but still retain a cell phone with the Houston area code.  

    Parent
    My Mom... (none / 0) (#41)
    by MileHi Hawkeye on Wed May 06, 2009 at 11:55:22 AM EST
    ...just got rid of her landline.  No problems so far.  

    I would give it up too, but I need it for the buzzer at the front door and for my dial-up connection on the laptop at home.  

    Parent

    Good point, a land-line is necessary (5.00 / 1) (#48)
    by easilydistracted on Wed May 06, 2009 at 12:03:02 PM EST
    for a DSL connection, isn't it. I'm not sure that's the type of dial-up you're referring to. I look to a land line as a safety feature. When I earlier mentioned the events of Houston, I forgot about the folks without power for many days. Batteries die on cell phones and land lines continue to work.  

    Parent
    The Phone company (5.00 / 1) (#50)
    by andgarden on Wed May 06, 2009 at 12:07:34 PM EST
    could offer you "dry loop" DSL, without POTS. I think Verizon and several others don't allow that anymore.

    But copper phone lines are on their way out. Fiber is the future, in one form or another. An interesting stimulus would have been for Congress to pay for fiber to the home, everywhere. That's the only real way we're going to get broadband everywhere.

    Parent

    Absolutely. (none / 0) (#54)
    by easilydistracted on Wed May 06, 2009 at 12:13:06 PM EST
    I bought an inexpensive gizmo (none / 0) (#49)
    by oculus on Wed May 06, 2009 at 12:05:03 PM EST
    that has a couple AA batteries and recharges cell for up to 80 hours.  Just need to keep AA batteries on hand.

    Parent
    I've got the old skool... (none / 0) (#51)
    by MileHi Hawkeye on Wed May 06, 2009 at 12:09:52 PM EST
    ...56K, $10/month dial-up.  Don't know nothin' about no fancy-pants DSL stuff.

    I really don't even notice the landline (except for the Qwest bill) as I have it forwarded to my cell phone.  And, I have an extra battery for it that's always charged and ready to go in an emergency.

       

    Parent

    Dial up? What's that? (5.00 / 1) (#53)
    by andgarden on Wed May 06, 2009 at 12:10:56 PM EST
    Darn, andgarden, ya beat me to it. (5.00 / 1) (#55)
    by easilydistracted on Wed May 06, 2009 at 12:14:05 PM EST
    That is the only way my CO brother (none / 0) (#60)
    by oculus on Wed May 06, 2009 at 12:26:06 PM EST
    can access Internet from his house due to terrain.  Painful.  Other issues:  no cable TV and no cell phone coverage w/i about five miles of house.

    Parent
    Some people enjoy that kind of isolation (none / 0) (#62)
    by andgarden on Wed May 06, 2009 at 12:31:38 PM EST
    I would go totally insane in about a day.

    Parent
    How about DirectTV or Dish Network. (none / 0) (#63)
    by easilydistracted on Wed May 06, 2009 at 12:42:42 PM EST
    Does the terrain also block a direct line of sight to the satellite? I don't now about the internet via the dish -- I've heard mixed reviews.

    Parent
    He has the dish, but complains (none / 0) (#64)
    by oculus on Wed May 06, 2009 at 12:47:03 PM EST
    he can't get the Marlins games!

    Parent
    You can have DSL (none / 0) (#65)
    by Spamlet on Wed May 06, 2009 at 12:53:03 PM EST
    with a so-called dry loop, i.e., no actual phone.

    Parent
    Even my luddite arse... (5.00 / 2) (#67)
    by kdog on Wed May 06, 2009 at 12:59:29 PM EST
    has high-speed Mile...damn, you might take the crown now.

    I'll never give up my landline and old school corded phone...no power required to use, comes in real handy in prolonged blackouts when you can't use a cordless or charge the cell.

    Parent

    Corded Phone (5.00 / 1) (#76)
    by coast on Wed May 06, 2009 at 01:37:12 PM EST
    Brought my daughter to the office the other week and when I got off the phone with her mother she said she was upset because she wanted to use the phone.  I told her we can talk to mom again in the car on the way home.  She said, "But I've never talked on a phone with one of those (the cord) before".  I about died.

    Parent
    Woo-hoo! (5.00 / 1) (#77)
    by MileHi Hawkeye on Wed May 06, 2009 at 01:38:05 PM EST
    I win?  Where's my prize?!

    Just to clear out any lingering doubt, I also lack an Iphone/Blackberry, have basic (non digital) cable and no HDTV.  

    I open my cans without the aid of electricity as well.  And albums--I've got a ton (literally and figuratively).  

    Parent

    You win an eight track player, my friend. (5.00 / 1) (#79)
    by easilydistracted on Wed May 06, 2009 at 01:41:52 PM EST
    Give me a week or two to dig around in the storage closet.

    Parent
    Egggcellent! (none / 0) (#82)
    by MileHi Hawkeye on Wed May 06, 2009 at 01:47:27 PM EST
    I'll cherish it always--like my reel-to-reel, the cassette player and the Minidisc deck.  

    /will finally have something to play that old Doobie Brothers 8-track on.  Takin' it to the streets!

    Parent

    BTW, Mile, (none / 0) (#111)
    by easilydistracted on Wed May 06, 2009 at 05:05:30 PM EST
    you missed the best part of the game last night. The 4th quarter. The Mavs just can't hang with the Nuggets in the 4th because they seem to wear down. Dirk got 35 last night and they steal lost; bad omen. Looks like next week I'll be heading to Chicago for about 4-6 weeks on an assignment. I'm always interested in hearing unique things to see and do.

    Parent
    See, the story I hear... (none / 0) (#116)
    by MileHi Hawkeye on Wed May 06, 2009 at 06:44:14 PM EST
    ...is that Nugs decided to play some D with Melo overcoming severe stomach cramps (been there done that) and Mr. Big Shot actually hitting a shot.  The Mavs are pretty short handed and beat-up, we'll see if the rest helps.  Kind of sucks not to have another game until Saturday though.  

    Hmm, Chicago in late Spring/early Summer?  If it were me, it would include...

    -Sliders at White Castle/authentic Polish food and baked goods/deep dish 'za/Chicago beef sandwiches  
    -Cubs game (or twelve)
    -a visit to the Checkerboard Lounge for some real blues
    -any lake-front festival (Jazz Fest, Taste of Chicago...)
    -trip to Filenes Basement
    -visit the Museum of Contemporary Art
    -a sail on the Lake

    There's always the oldies but goodies like Navy Pier, Shedd Aquarium, the riverboat tour.  

    Parent

    Thanks, Mile. (none / 0) (#134)
    by easilydistracted on Thu May 07, 2009 at 08:17:29 AM EST
    I've done some of those activities at one time or another during trips to Chicago. However, you mentioned several that do interest me, like the Checkerboard. Blues at the Checkerboard and afterward sliders at the Castle. Hmmm. I'll probably need a location of an urgent care center for the day after that junket. See, I knew you could help. Thanks.

    Problems for the Mavs continue, off the court this time. You may have already heard that some lady who had been staying at Dirk's house in Preston Hollow (same neighborhood as the relocated G Bush)was arrested yesterday. Seemed she had been going by six or seven aliases and had several outstanding warrants.  

    Parent

    It is certainly quite the... (none / 0) (#135)
    by MileHi Hawkeye on Thu May 07, 2009 at 08:41:49 AM EST
    ...experience.  The neighborhood around there is like a war zone (I would definately take a cab) but once you get inside the CB, they treat you like a long lost family member.  Even if one is the only blond haired, blue eyed person there.

    I take it this woman wasn't a stalker, but rather a friend of Dirk's?    

    Parent

    Depending on the news report, (none / 0) (#137)
    by easilydistracted on Thu May 07, 2009 at 10:05:01 AM EST
    just a friend staying at his residence or girlfriend. Disgruntled Spurs fan probably ratted her out.

    Parent
    I think Mile does deserve the crown... (none / 0) (#68)
    by easilydistracted on Wed May 06, 2009 at 01:08:48 PM EST
    Listen to us kdog, we're letting Mile have it about it dial-up but at the same time saying you can have my land line when you pry my cold dead fingers off of it. Hmm.

    Parent
    The importance of a corded landline... (none / 0) (#69)
    by kdog on Wed May 06, 2009 at 01:24:36 PM EST
    only dawned on me when we had that blackout in NY a few years back...its the only phone that worked since my cell sat on my dresser, turned off as usual, with no juice.  The cordless landline was useless as well.

    No school like the old school in a lot of ways.

    They ain't taking my albums and cassettes either:)

    Parent

    I agree. Read above where I wrote about my (none / 0) (#71)
    by easilydistracted on Wed May 06, 2009 at 01:26:48 PM EST
    adventures in Houston during the hurricane. Albums, huh. You still have a turntable?

    Parent
    Sorry... (none / 0) (#74)
    by kdog on Wed May 06, 2009 at 01:30:17 PM EST
    missed it, you guys got it covered.

    And hell yeah I still listen to records...analog is where its at Easy D.

    Parent

    Old school represent! (none / 0) (#86)
    by lobary on Wed May 06, 2009 at 02:29:26 PM EST
    When I tell people that I prefer not to use a cell phone and that I still have a landline, they look at me like I'm a member of one of the world's lost tribes.

    Parent
    They can buy you a cell phone (5.00 / 1) (#118)
    by oldpro on Wed May 06, 2009 at 07:48:45 PM EST
    but they can't make you use it!

    My kid keeps saying "Mom!  Keep your cell next to your keys and when you take your keys, take your cell phone!"

    Yeah, right.  I've remembered that twice in the last two years...both times when I was leaving town.  (Driving alone at night it could come in handy).  Otherwise?  No.

    Few things are more annoying that people babbling on their phones (at the top of their lungs!) on the street or in a store, restaurant, sidewalk cafe.  I'm beginning to understand rage...

    Parent

    Heh, my mom is much more into the cell (5.00 / 1) (#121)
    by nycstray on Wed May 06, 2009 at 08:20:29 PM EST
    than I am! I do not have a land line because I was  tired of paying for 2 phones I barely use. I kept the cell because I need to be reachable for work even if I'm in the dog run :) and I do like carrying it when I'm out at night etc. It also doubles as an alarm clock, oh and watch also. Now mom, she's got the bluetooth head set and some set up in her car etc. and prefers the cell over land line. I find all this amusing. When I bought her online service years ago, she wasn't all that into it even though I set everything up. Didn't need the hassle, she says. She finally got a cell phone. I'm trying to think of what made her go all cell phone nuts, because she wasn't in the beginning (resistant like online). Prob when service got more stable as I know she likes to be able to hang where ever when talking on the phone. I get calls when she's driving or my fav is when she's in the parking lot at the gym because the family can't bother her, lol!~ Her bluetooth set up in the car is pretty neat as I can't tell when she gets in her car and goes somewhere. I was talking to her one day and she took the dog to the vet with me on the line :)

    I'm personally not comfortable talking on the phone in public. It's fine for meeting friends at the ball park etc, but generally, if someone calls me, I let them know I'll call them back whenever if it isn't urgent. Work generally only calls to check about rush jobs etc as they all know I prefer email  ;)

    Parent

    I do have a cell phone and I do remember (5.00 / 1) (#122)
    by caseyOR on Wed May 06, 2009 at 08:22:43 PM EST
    to take it with me. I do not, however, remember to turn it on unless I need to make a call. It did come in handy a couple of weeks ago when I was rear-ended at a red light by a guy who was talking on his cell phone. After turning my phone on, I called my insurance company immediately.

    This was the first time I have been involved in a traffic accident (started driving in 1968), and I wanted to be sure I did everything right.

    By the way, this happened in Vancouver, WA. The law in WA allows hands-free cell phone talking, but no handheld. It didn't make any difference. The guy was on speakerphone, talking with his wife, looked down to disconnect the call and hit me.

    Parent

    I always wondered about handsfree (none / 0) (#123)
    by nycstray on Wed May 06, 2009 at 08:59:02 PM EST
    talking. It still sounds like a distraction to me (I don't drive yet). My one friend used to call me on her way home from the office (she works at home and has to commute in on occasion, min 1.5hrs) to fill me in on the "latest" and I'm pretty sure she doesn't have hands free. I quit picking up the calls. Mom's another story, as half the time I don't know she's in the car! :) Plus, with my dad's health, I would never not answer these days. I'm not totally comfortable being on the other end of driving calls. I trust my mom's judgment more than my friend without hands free. Mom also has a thingy on her steering wheel to control hands free so she doesn't have to deal with the phone on the seat next to her.

    Your back ok and everything?

    Parent

    No damage to me. (none / 0) (#127)
    by caseyOR on Wed May 06, 2009 at 11:20:54 PM EST
    The car is another story. The visible damage seems to only involve the rear bumper. I am checking out body shops so that I can get an estimate to the insurance company. Fortunately, the car is drivable.

    I was talking with a psychologist about the accident and hands-free vs. handheld. She told me the most current studies show that hands-free is not safer. The distraction comes from the conversation, not the use of the hands. And, cell phone use is more problematic than messing with the radio or sipping a drink because  the cell phone conversation goes on so much longer. A quick glance at the radio lasts barely a second; a phone call goes for minutes. And texting!! OMG, what a disaster that can be. Talk about not paying attention to the road.

    Also, talking on the cell activates a different part of the brain, different even than talking to a passenger in the car. Once again, the cell is much more distracting.

    Parent

    That goes along with what I was thinking (none / 0) (#129)
    by nycstray on Wed May 06, 2009 at 11:36:19 PM EST
    I know where my attention is when talking on the phone vs other tasking like emailing while watching TV. I can even read and watch TV (drove my dad NUTS I tell ya!) When I'm in a car with someone and we are talking, we  both usually check the road. It's instinct because you're in the now, not connected to another space.

    When I start driving (soon!) I plan on giving my mom an emergency signal. Like let it ring once or twice and call back and do the same so i know to call her right away. Otherwise, you won't see me answering the phone in the car anymore often then when I have my dog on the leash on the city streets.

    They just did a piece on our news about someone wanting to take action about driving while distracted saying it was basically the same as DUI. The problem was, what is considered a distraction and they talked about an accident where some woman was painting her nails, etc. People drive me nuts sometimes. We really shouldn't have to legislate driving to that degree, but lack of common sense and in some cases, sheer stupidity make ya wonder if we should.

    Glad you weren't hurt. I've had a few rearend pain in the backs. Hope getting the car fixed isn't a hassle through insurance {visualizes smooth sailing} :)

    Parent

    Turn it on? Whatever for? (none / 0) (#126)
    by oldpro on Wed May 06, 2009 at 10:28:33 PM EST
    That would mean I had given out the number and expected people to call me on the cell phone!  No way.  They have my home number and the answering machine takes a message so I can call back.  The cell phone is only for emergencies....mine...and I rarely have any...

    The law in Washington...yeah...Tracy Eide (the senator who primed the cell phone bills!) would be disgusted at the accident you found yourself entangled with.  I think she thought the law would solve the accident problem.  No doubt it did cut down on them but distraction is distraction and holding a phone isn't much different than smoking or coffee in the car.

    When I ran the office for the House Majority Leader, we talked for hours on her car phone as she went here or there...especially late at night when she had a long drive home and I was still in the office.  Got a lot of work done that way!  And, she had company on those long drives.  So busy that some weeks that's the only way to talk to her at all!

    Ah, the good old days in the 90s.

    Parent

    No traffic (none / 0) (#128)
    by caseyOR on Wed May 06, 2009 at 11:23:04 PM EST
    I'm guessing that on those long drives home, the majority leader was not driving in traffic. I wouldn't chat on the phone even on a deserted highway, but I would think the opportunities to crash into others are minimal.

    Parent
    Right. Rarely traffic (5.00 / 1) (#131)
    by oldpro on Wed May 06, 2009 at 11:48:01 PM EST
    but sometimes it was a way to make sure she stayed awake as I talked her home, sometimes a 3 or 4 hour drive after a long day in a rural district.  Those city legislators don't know how lucky they are to be in a district that is only 20 minutes from one end to the other!

    Parent
    I Posted a Story (none / 0) (#42)
    by CDN Ctzn on Wed May 06, 2009 at 11:55:26 AM EST
    late lat night that I read in Tuesdays "Guardian" on the front page. Here is the link. So far I haven't seen a thing in the US media about it. Has anyone else heard a peep?
    I'm not sure which is worse, the trajedy of the situation, or the relative silence over it. Well, that's not exactly true, obviously the killing of 100 civilians ranks as the worst!

    AP reports Hillary Clinton apologized (none / 0) (#47)
    by oculus on Wed May 06, 2009 at 12:01:47 PM EST
    today (carefully worded) and also reports Red Cross is on it.

    Parent
    Barillary (none / 0) (#72)
    by Capt Howdy on Wed May 06, 2009 at 01:27:56 PM EST
    President Obama is morphing into Hillary Clinton

    Health care is another example. While Obama was outflanking Clinton on the left on Iraq, she made up for it by criticizing his health care plan as inadequate. Both candidates claimed to support universal health care, but only Clinton's plan included a government mandate that would force all Americans to have health insurance.

    Primary voters will recall Clinton and Obama endlessly debating this, with Clinton accusing Obama of leaving about 15 million people without health care and Obama warning voters that Clinton's plan would require "harsh, stiff penalties on those who don't purchase it."

    Just as with Iraq, Obama is now moving toward Clinton's position. His budget outline proposes a health care plan that "must put the United States on a clear path to cover all Americans." That strongly suggests a mandate, since any volunteer system would see some opting out. As Ezra Klein reported in The American Prospect when the administration's health care plan began to leak out, "Despite the controversy over the individual mandate in the campaign, [Obama's team] will support it."

    We should be so lucky (5.00 / 2) (#78)
    by jbindc on Wed May 06, 2009 at 01:38:34 PM EST
    Gee, I thought she wasn't good enough? It's interesting he's "morphing into" her and now it's ok.....

    Parent
    Yeah - adopting her positions (5.00 / 4) (#88)
    by ruffian on Wed May 06, 2009 at 02:37:46 PM EST
    is not the same as having the thorough grasp of the situation and facts that led her to those positions. I hold her positions, for pete's sake. Doesn't mean I am her. Not even close, even on my best day.

    Parent
    Imitation vs. the Real Thing (5.00 / 1) (#92)
    by jbindc on Wed May 06, 2009 at 02:55:25 PM EST
    I hear ya, ruffian....

    Parent
    movin to montana soon? (none / 0) (#85)
    by Capt Howdy on Wed May 06, 2009 at 02:23:15 PM EST
    From the AP:
    The state of Montana has signed into power a revolutionary gun law.  The State of Montana has defied the federal government and their gun laws. This will prompt a showdown between the federal government and the State of Montana.
    Montana has gone beyond drawing a line in the sand. They have challenged the Federal Government.
    If guns and ammunition are manufactured inside the State of Montana for sale and use inside that state then the federal firearms laws have no applicability since the federal government only has the power to control commerce across state lines.
    Silencers made in Montana and sold in Montana would be fully legal and not registered.


    The whiskey rebellion, 2009 edition? (none / 0) (#90)
    by KeysDan on Wed May 06, 2009 at 02:48:53 PM EST
    Maybe Montana will become the deja vu testing ground for federal authority, although unlike President George Washington,  I do not expect President Obama to personally command the military in the field.

    Parent
    Good for Montana... (none / 0) (#93)
    by kdog on Wed May 06, 2009 at 02:57:19 PM EST
    I defer to them the best way for them to live...it is a long way from D.C. after all, they would know best.

    Revolution can be a very healthy thing...I hope more states flip the feds the bird and forge their own way.

    Parent

    Like this perhaps? (none / 0) (#95)
    by MileHi Hawkeye on Wed May 06, 2009 at 03:17:43 PM EST
    House members Monday again approved a resolution claiming Oklahoma's sovereignty.

    Link

    Easy D, you might want to get out while the gettin' is good.  

    Parent

    C'mon New York... (none / 0) (#100)
    by kdog on Wed May 06, 2009 at 03:38:21 PM EST
    get on the bandwagon:)

    We never will though...we didn't even wanna fight the Brits back in the day, came along kicking and screaming.

    Easy D and myself can join you in soveriegn MileHi-topia if this secession fever really starts spreading:)

    Parent

    New York City (none / 0) (#104)
    by jbindc on Wed May 06, 2009 at 03:50:25 PM EST
    contemplated secession several times, but especially during the Civil War.

    You just gotta get more people on board,kdog!

    Parent

    Interesting... (5.00 / 0) (#106)
    by kdog on Wed May 06, 2009 at 03:59:25 PM EST
    a good read over a smoke later, Thanks JB.

    As for getting people on board...I think I'll just keep living in the sovereign nation of my imagination:)

    Parent

    I like Jimmy Breslin even more now... (none / 0) (#138)
    by kdog on Thu May 07, 2009 at 10:16:49 AM EST
    did't think that was possible.

    I really miss his writing...one of the best.

    Parent

    about 100 years ago (none / 0) (#140)
    by Capt Howdy on Thu May 07, 2009 at 10:55:32 AM EST
    I was having lunch one day in Manhattan.  I sat down and ordered and before the food came a stinky cloud of cigar smoke came wafting from the next cube.
    -full disclosure - I hate cigars.  they are one of those "guy" things that I simply dont get.  like Ice Hockey or talking earnestly with one foot propped up on something -
    anyway, I got up and told the waitress I was moving because of the stinky cigar.
    later she came over and breathlessly said something like "do you know who that is???? thats Jimmy Breslin!!!!"
    I replied that I didnt care who it was I would like to stick that stinky cigar in his ear.
    (btw, I did know who it was)

    Parent
    Wish I was with you.... (none / 0) (#145)
    by kdog on Thu May 07, 2009 at 12:09:53 PM EST
    that day...I woulda asked Jimmy if he had another stogie and went to town with 20 questions...that guy had his finger on the pulse of this city like no other.

    Parent
    Wow, I just caught your post. (none / 0) (#139)
    by easilydistracted on Thu May 07, 2009 at 10:47:45 AM EST
    Hey, I better toss the family into the car and head for Kansas. Darn that border just keeps moving north.

    Parent
    This gobbledygook is getting a bit out of (none / 0) (#141)
    by easilydistracted on Thu May 07, 2009 at 10:59:38 AM EST
    hand. I wonder what their reaction would be if the DoD decided to close Tinker AFB, Vance AFB, Altus, AFB and Fort Sill Army Base. If Vance ever closed, Enid would just fold-up.

    Parent
    If only Wisconsin were as progressive (none / 0) (#94)
    by Cream City on Wed May 06, 2009 at 03:05:28 PM EST
    on this issue as Montana!  Hard to say it, but it's so -- we have a nutty AG on this issue now.

    And it's so on other issues.  Hail Montana, home of the first woman elected to Congress, 'way back in 1916, who became the only member of Congress to vote against both world wars.  By comparison, Wisconsin didn't elect a woman to Congress until almost the end of the century.

    The reputations that states get are so weird, with so much mythology, that can mask many issues.

    Parent

    The problem (none / 0) (#96)
    by eric on Wed May 06, 2009 at 03:19:54 PM EST
    of course is not that you can't avoid being included in "interstate commerce" by merely staying within the state.  If there is interstate commerce that involves guns and ammunition, which there is, then the Congress can regulate them, even if they never leave Montana.

    Parent
    typo (none / 0) (#97)
    by eric on Wed May 06, 2009 at 03:25:37 PM EST
    didn't mean to type "not" in that first sentence.

    The problem IS that you can't avoid being included in "interstate commerce". . .


    Parent

    Interesting. (none / 0) (#98)
    by sarcastic unnamed one on Wed May 06, 2009 at 03:29:37 PM EST
    I read something not too long ago, maybe here, that the feds are taking the concept of interstate commerce clause to pretty extreme lengths.

    Parent
    Interstate commerce... (none / 0) (#99)
    by kdog on Wed May 06, 2009 at 03:35:41 PM EST
    was the loophole that enabled drug prohibition, if I'm not mistaken...it's the feds ace in the hole when they wanna meddle into individual state business.

    Parent
    You are correct (none / 0) (#101)
    by eric on Wed May 06, 2009 at 03:42:53 PM EST
    The Gonzales v. Raich case stood for the proposition that the Feds can regulate marijuana even if it never leaves the state.

    On the other hand, interstate commerce is also the way the feds were able to enforce civil rights laws in the south, which was a good thing, I think.

    Parent

    Yup (none / 0) (#103)
    by andgarden on Wed May 06, 2009 at 03:46:30 PM EST
    I'll take national civil rights, thanks.

    Parent
    Some meddling is better than others... (none / 0) (#107)
    by kdog on Wed May 06, 2009 at 04:00:39 PM EST
    point taken...though I doubt the founders intended for any of these uses of the clause.

    Parent
    Actually (none / 0) (#105)
    by jbindc on Wed May 06, 2009 at 03:52:43 PM EST
    The Rehnquist Court pulled it back a bunch from what the concept was during the New Deal era.  See US v. Lopez, for example.

    Parent
    Yes, (none / 0) (#102)
    by jbindc on Wed May 06, 2009 at 03:44:32 PM EST
    See Gonzales v. Raich which upheld a federal law regarding marijuana, and where the Court found the federal law valid, although the marijuana in question had been grown and consumed within a single state, and had never entered Interstate Commerce.

    However, Thomas said this in dissent, which is what the folks in Montana may be hanging their hats on:

    Respondents Diane Monson and Angel Raich use marijuana that has never been bought or sold, that has never crossed state lines, and that has had no demonstrable effect on the national market for marijuana. If Congress can regulate this under the Commerce Clause, then it can regulate virtually anything - and the federal Government is no longer one of limited and enumerated powers.


    Parent
    Also (5.00 / 0) (#108)
    by eric on Wed May 06, 2009 at 04:35:07 PM EST
    I think that Scalia voted the way he did because it was marijuana at issue.  Guns?  Who knows, he might have decided differently.

    Parent
    How many of you received a personal (none / 0) (#112)
    by oculus on Wed May 06, 2009 at 05:08:58 PM EST
    letter from President Barack Obama today?  And, on the envelope above my name and mailing address:  XXX, can I count on you?

    Yes, it was from the DNC and solicited money.  Among the President's "Bold Plans to Secure America's Economic Future":  

    Health care---Comprehensively reforming health care so that families, businesses, and government are relieved from crushing costs that impede economic growth and prosperity.


    If the Dems (5.00 / 1) (#113)
    by MO Blue on Wed May 06, 2009 at 05:50:29 PM EST
    actually produce AFFORDABLE HealthCARE, I will donate some $$$ to them. I think the money will stay in my pocket for quite some time.

    Didn't get a personal letter from the President either. Oh well.

    Parent

    Yeah (5.00 / 1) (#115)
    by TeresaInSnow2 on Wed May 06, 2009 at 06:37:50 PM EST
    definitely don't hold your breath or you'll know the other meaning of:

    MO BLUE!

    ;-).

    Parent

    Hey, after all the mailings and (5.00 / 1) (#114)
    by Anne on Wed May 06, 2009 at 06:24:02 PM EST
    all the surveys they sent me, all of which I sent back on their dime with "Take me off the mailing list" and suggestions for how cold hell would have to be before I sent them another dime, written in all caps and indelible black ink, maybe they actually DID take me off the list!

    Will probably get something tomorrow, but I'm excited to think/hope I won't be getting that brand of junk mail anymore.

    Parent

    Marriage equality in Hawaii (none / 0) (#117)
    by MyLeftMind on Wed May 06, 2009 at 06:44:17 PM EST
    Hawaii's civil unions bill made it through the House this spring, but is stuck in a Senate committee stacked with anti-equality members.  The HI Senate is considering forcing it out of committee to a floor vote this week.  The LGBT communities in Hawaii have been working hard with sign waving and petitions, but the right wing fundamentalist church groups mounted a well funded opposition.  Pro-civil union contact by the public is key right now because HI elected officials won't act if they think they're not publicly supported.  

    Please take 10-20 minutes to make some calls and email these key senators, especially if you're more likely to travel to Hawaii if the Aloha state lives up to its name and passes the civil unions bill, HB444.

    Sen. Kalani English ............ 808-587-7225  senenglish@Capitol.hawaii.gov
    Sen. Brickwood Galuteria... 808-586-6740  sengaluteria@Capitol.hawaii.gov
    Sen. Josh Green................  808-586-9385  sengreen@Capitol.hawaii.gov
    Sen. Colleen Hanabusa...... 808-586-7793  senhanabusa@Capitol.hawaii.gov
    Sen. Clayton Hee............... 808-586-7330  senhee@Capitol.hawaii.gov
    Sen. David Ige.................   808-586-6230  sendige@Capitol.hawaii.gov
    Sen. Russell Kokubun......... 808-586-6760  senkokubun@Capitol.hawaii.gov
    Sen. Clarence Nishihara....808-586-6970  sennishihara@Capitol.hawaii.gov
    Sen. Dwight Takamine......808-586-7335  sentakamine@Capitol.hawaii.gov
    Sen. Brian Taniguchi........808-586-6460  sentaniguchi@Capitol.hawaii.gov
    Sen. Jill Tokuda.................  808-587-7215  sentokuda@Capitol.hawaii.gov
    Sen. Shan Tsutsui.............. 808-586-7344  sentsutsui@Capitol.hawaii.gov

    Feel free to forward this info to pro-equality email lists.

    Fresh from the battle (none / 0) (#120)
    by gyrfalcon on Wed May 06, 2009 at 08:00:07 PM EST
    for marriage equality here in Vermont, lemme say that I think it's an extraordinarly bad idea and thoroughly counterproductive for residents of one state to pressure legislators in another state on this or any other issue because it just makes them really mad.

    We got a number of vote for marriage equality here from conservative legislators who were on the fence because they were so infuriated by all the email and  letters and phone calls they got from busybody out-of-state opponents telling them what to do.

    Tactically, it's far better to let the "forces of evil" do all the annoying because it absolutely does not work for them and creates backlash in our direction to boot.

    Parent

    Good points, but (none / 0) (#153)
    by MyLeftMind on Fri May 08, 2009 at 12:41:45 PM EST
    Hawaii's economy is completely dependent on tourism and military funding. The military inputs won't change, but gays are a powerful force in the tourism industry. You gotta admit, if you're going to travel to a different state to git hitched, Hawaii's a lot more romantic than rustic old Vermont. (not trying to diss your state, of course...)

    The real purpose of pushing for other states to allow civil unions is that the more states that allow it, the more likely the federal government is to address the lack of federal benefits for civil unions.

    My Obama fantasy statement, replete with bipartisanship, support for opposing opinions and recognition of the complexity of this issue:

    "Look, this is an issue that should be decided by the people in each state. But we have some states that have taken the position that same sex couples should be allowed to enter in domestic contracts. The federal government needs to accommodate those state-level civil unions with matching federal rights and responsibilities. Therefore, we are repealing the so called `Defense of Marriage Act' and modifying federal law, including IRS and Social Security rules, to recognize those domestic contracts that are available in some states throughout the country."
     

    Obama, can you hear me?

    Parent

    Is it ever going to stop raining? (none / 0) (#125)
    by Anne on Wed May 06, 2009 at 09:34:46 PM EST
    It feels like forever since the sun was out, and it's pouring rain again.

    Six or seven years ago, when we had to have our well drilled another 150 feet because it was going dry, I swore that I would never complain about the rain, but it's been almost a week of rain and gray and fog and gray.  Lots of gray.

    Maybe the sun will be out for Mother's Day - that's four whole days away!

    Not sure, but I might be growing moss on my north side...

    For those that (none / 0) (#130)
    by CoralGables on Wed May 06, 2009 at 11:37:45 PM EST
    like a little lemon-pepper chicken and cheesy rice pilaf to go with their politics, the Big Dog is a guest on the Rachael Ray show on Thursday morning.

    I got an email from his foundation (none / 0) (#132)
    by nycstray on Wed May 06, 2009 at 11:49:06 PM EST
    I guess it's about childhood obesity and RR has partnered up with him. Normally I would be home working and I could tune in, but I have a class tomorrow. Hopefully it will be online later. Glad to see him out there promoting his causes. Wonder if the Republicans are going to have a prob with the SoS's hubby on RR?  ;)

    Parent
    Thanks for the heads up! (none / 0) (#133)
    by NJDem on Thu May 07, 2009 at 07:39:09 AM EST
    For some reason I didn't get the e-mail--but I just DVR'd it.  I would have anyway for the Big Dawg, but the recipe sounds right up my alley!

    Parent
    John Yoo cannot be disciplined (none / 0) (#136)
    by jbindc on Thu May 07, 2009 at 09:28:32 AM EST
    Jan Crawford Greenburg is reporting on this on her blog.

    It appears John Yoo cannot be disciplined or disbarred for writing those memos, even if the Office of Professional Responsibility says it has evidence he should be.

    That's because OPR's five-year investigation--carefully timed for release only as Bush was leaving the White House and Obama was coming in--dragged on too long. As a result of that timing, OPR blew the deadline for referring possible misconduct allegations against Yoo.

    John Yoo is admitted to the bar in Pennsylvania. But the Pennsylvania Disciplinary Board, which would investigate any complaints against him, imposes a four-year limitation for complaints.

    Yoo wrote the memos in 2002 and 2003. This is 2009. You do the math.

    Here's the pertinent section, from the state's Disciplinary Board Rules:

    "The Office of Disciplinary Counsel or the Board shall not entertain any complaint arising out of acts or omissions occurring more than four years prior to the date of the complaint."

    There are a few exceptions--that the lawyer concealed a crime, for example--which don't apply.

    SNIP

    And what about Bybee? Now a federal appeals court judge, Bybee is admitted in DC and Nevada--those jurisdictions don't have comparable limitations periods. But how strange would it be to only refer Bybee, when his involvement largely amounted making a few edits and signing Yoo's legal work?

    Then there's the report itself. The bar for disciplinary action is incredibly high. Legal ethics experts, like Geoffrey Hazard at the University of Pennyslvania, say they expect nothing to happen, even if the state disciplinary boards were to investigate.

    Hazard says Yoo and Bybee have a number of strong available defenses, and that it's awfully hard to say the memo was so "outside the range of plausible lawyered judgment that no reasonable lawyer could render it." Without that, he says, there's no ethical violation.



    Manny Ramirez (none / 0) (#142)
    by CST on Thu May 07, 2009 at 11:07:48 AM EST
    just got suspended for 50 games for steroids.

    I bet you are feeling better about that non-trade now kdog.

    I'm feeling great about Jason Bay.

    Wow... (none / 0) (#143)
    by MileHi Hawkeye on Thu May 07, 2009 at 11:13:04 AM EST
    ...maybe that will slow the Dodgers down some.  We'll take all the help we can get in that department.

    How did you like that Celts game last night, CST?  My friend was at the game, sitting right behind the bench and KG.

    Parent

    lucky friend (none / 0) (#144)
    by CST on Thu May 07, 2009 at 11:27:02 AM EST
    great game - although whoever decided it was a bright idea to have the celtics, bruins, and sox all playing at the same time is an idiot.

    We went to a sports bar since it was the only way to see them all.  It got very confusing though because the shouting would happen so often and you never knew what it was for.

    We had to delegate certain games to certain people so we would at least know what the shouting was for.

    I took the Celts though since baseball wasn't the playoffs and I have a hard time following hockey.

    Parent

    I'd still take him... (none / 0) (#146)
    by kdog on Thu May 07, 2009 at 12:12:18 PM EST
    for 100 games:)

    Surprising but not surprising.

    Parent

    Update... (none / 0) (#147)
    by kdog on Thu May 07, 2009 at 01:23:47 PM EST
    Doesn't look like roids or HGH, but a non-baseball related performance enhancer to put it mildly.  Link

    Parent
    wow (none / 0) (#148)
    by CST on Thu May 07, 2009 at 01:32:32 PM EST
    that really sucks.  Why is it banned?

    Parent
    Beats me... (none / 0) (#149)
    by kdog on Thu May 07, 2009 at 01:55:36 PM EST
    if baseball drug regs are at all similar to Olympic regs, most anything and everything could test as a banned substance.

    I'm waiting for the poppy seed bagel defense sometime soon in the future.

    Parent

    well (none / 0) (#150)
    by CST on Thu May 07, 2009 at 02:02:08 PM EST
    i don't have a link for it - but now i'm hearing that he tested positive for a female fertility drug that is used as a masking agent.

    so who knows.

    I always wondered about poppy seed bagels.  I love me some poppy seeds.  Luckily I never had a drug test.

    Parent

    I think its urban myth... (none / 0) (#151)
    by kdog on Thu May 07, 2009 at 02:07:07 PM EST
    though I believe false positives are far more common than the state or the testting labs would like us to believe.

    Parent
    mythbusters (none / 0) (#152)
    by CST on Thu May 07, 2009 at 02:24:59 PM EST
    had a segment on it.

    They took three seperate drug tests after poppy seed eating.

    One of them tested positive.

    So either it's a coincidence, a really high false positive rate, or it's somewhat true.

    Parent