home

Tuesday Early Birds Open Thread

I'm just heading to bed, so I know lots of you early birds will be looking to express yourselves on a variety of topics before I get up. Here's some space for you to do just that. All topics welcomre.

< Artists for Innocence | FTC Alleges Mortgage Lender Discriminated Against Latino Borrowers >
  • The Online Magazine with Liberal coverage of crime-related political and injustice news

  • Contribute To TalkLeft


  • Display: Sort:
    interesting (5.00 / 1) (#1)
    by Capt Howdy on Tue May 12, 2009 at 09:31:16 AM EST
    example A:

    Ordinary people, struggling to prosper and raise their children in a complex world, are tired of being told that everything they revere is subject to deconstruction and re-interpretation. They are tired of hearing that every standard they hold is an insult to those who don't meet it, and every belief is an insult to those who don't share it. They're weary of being used as test subjects in grand social experiments. To maintain a common culture, we must have ideals with intrinsic meaning, just as some of the words in any language must have a clear and unambiguous meaning. Government is not something imposed from above on its citizens, in a democracy - its authority flows upward from them. They have a right to expect that government to honor the vows and commitments they have made between themselves, dating back to centuries before the United States of America existed. They have a right to live in a society that doesn't expend its energies trying to condition them to forget something they have understood since the first time they saw their fathers and mothers standing together and smiling down at them in the cradle...

    example B:

    Supporters of slavery in the 18th century used legal, economic, and religious arguments to defend slavery. They were able to do so effectively because all three of these reasons provide ample support of the peculiar institution that was so vital to the South.
    Legally speaking, the constitution offered numerous arguments for slavery and clearly protected the protected the people's rights to own slaves. The 3/5 clause clearly states that slaves are subordinate being who belong enslaved. This compromise also exposes the fact that slaves were thought of as property. Because the slaves are the property of whitest they are protected by the V amendment which states the protection of property. According to this amendment neither the government, nor anyone else had the right to take slaves away from their owners. The 10th amendment furthermore stated that the powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people. Since nowhere was the government given the power to get rid of slavery, that power belonged to the state, and the people. In these ways the constitution provided those in favor of slavery with a strong argument.

    Well Well Well (none / 0) (#2)
    by Militarytracy on Tue May 12, 2009 at 10:43:46 AM EST
    People being escorted out of the Healthcare talks this morning.  CNN reports that one of them is a doctor, and they have some beautiful clear film footage of the doc being escorted out.  I wonder if a CNN film crew provided that footage or if it was given to them by some film crew that just happened to be handily recording :)? I'm fine with folks protesting but there is a faint aroma today about the information the press is getting, and how quickly they are getting info about the "credibility" of the protesters that reminds me of brownshirts in Florida.  The GOP brought their own film crew to Crawford to record the bus full of counter protesters who showed up for a half an hour and sang God Bless America across the ditch from us dirty hippies.  Next thing that happened within hours of that, fabulous counter protest footage hit all the networks for hours and days long after the bus had reloaded and all counter protesters had left forever.

    is the republican goal (none / 0) (#3)
    by Capt Howdy on Tue May 12, 2009 at 11:26:31 AM EST
    to become a singularity?

    The expected announcement Tuesday by Florida Gov. Charlie Crist that he's running for the Senate would seem to be a rare bit of good news for beleaguered Republicans.

    But while Crist is a brand-name recruit with sky-high approval ratings and bipartisan appeal, his path to keeping the seat of retiring Sen. Mel Martinez in GOP hands has at least one significant roadblock: Sunshine State conservatives.

    Despite Crist's widespread popularity, he faces a primary in which he will have to make his case to a restless GOP base dissatisfied with his high-profile advocacy for President Barack Obama's stimulus and his handling of the state's budget woes.

    And he will be facing a vigorous fight from former Florida House Speaker Marco Rubio, a young, outspoken Hispanic conservative who is capturing the attention of activists in Florida and across the country.


    Those of you who have been (none / 0) (#4)
    by Anne on Tue May 12, 2009 at 11:50:23 AM EST
    just dying to read more of the trenchant opinions of John Yoo, torture advocate-extraordinaire, can start reading them in the Philadelphia Inquirer:

    The Philadelphia Inquirer already has a long line-up of conservative columnists, including Michael Smerconish and Rick Santorum (who reportedly makes $1,750 per column). Attytood's Will Bunch reveals that the Inquirer now has one more: torture architect John Yoo. The Inquirer hired Yoo in late 2008, but according to Bunch, didn't give him a byline as an "Inquirer columnist" until Sunday. Bunch wrote to Inquirer editorial page editor Harold Jackson and received this response:

    John Yoo has written freelance commentaries for The Inquirer since 2005, however he entered into a contract to write a monthly column in late 2008. I won't discuss the compensation of anyone who writes for us. Of course, we know more about Mr. Yoo's actions in the Justice Department now than we did at the time we contracted him. But we did not blindly enter into our agreement. He's a Philadelphian, and very knowledgeable about the legal subjects he discusses in his commentaries. Our readers have been able to get directly from Mr. Yoo his thoughts on a number of subjects concerning law and the courts, including measures taken by the White House post-9/11. That has promoted further discourse, which is the objective of newspaper commentary.

    Bunch responds: "The higher calling for an American newspaper should be promoting and maintaining our sometimes fragile democracy, the very thing that Yoo and his band of torture advocates very nearly shredded in a few short years. Quite simply, by handing Yoo a regularly scheduled platform for his viewpoint, the Inquirer is telling its readers that Yoo's ideas -- especially that torture is not a crime against the very essence of America -- are acceptable."

    Maybe Yoo can hire Gonzales as his copy boy - I hear Al's still looking for work...

    Donald Trump's Traditional American Values (none / 0) (#5)
    by MyLeftMind on Tue May 12, 2009 at 12:56:26 PM EST
    "We have determined that the uh, that the pictures taken [of Carrie Prejean's naked or semi-naked body] are fine."

    No mention of Prejean's lies about the pictures, but the miscommunication problem between Miss CA and Prejean is totally solved.  The "miscommunication" must refer to the contract Prejean signed saying she had never taken any of nude or semi-nude pictures, and after that was revealed as a lie, she said she had only taken one picture, and then when more surfaced, she said something else...) What a farce.

    Read: Money trumps everything else, and firing Prejean would result in more public defense of her, and likely translate to a huge monetary loss for the so called beauty pageants.  Trump does NOT want those men who ogle the beauties on display to think that Carrie was fired for her opinion about gay marriage.