home

Hundreds of NY Drug Prisoners May Be Resentenced

As Jeralyn discussed Thursday, an agreement between the New York legislature and Gov. David Paterson will finally reform the state's Rockefeller-era drug laws. At the time of Jeralyn's post, the relief that the legislation would provide to drug offenders currently serving sentences was unclear.

Although some language in the new law is still being negotiated, the governor announced yesterday that the legislation will enable hundreds of prisoners to seek resentencing. It appears that the resentencing options include treatment in lieu of continued incarceration.

Prosecutors -- who will lose the power they now hold to decide whether a drug offender will receive a lengthy sentence by charging crimes that have mandatory minimums -- are complaining that judges shouldn't have the option of sending repeat offenders to treatment instead of incarcerating them. [more ...]

“If you let someone who has five prior convictions into treatment over the prosecutor’s objections, that’s really symbolic of a revolving door,” said Bridget G. Brennan, the special narcotics prosecutor for New York City. “We’re worried that this will permit endless cycles of meaningless and expensive treatment.”

How arrogant is that? Brennan's argument is that prosecutors are more capable than judges of deciding whether a particular defendant deserves a chance at treatment rather than incarceration. Isn't she familiar with the concept of separation of powers? Her job is to prosecute. The judge's job is to sentence.

As Jeralyn's post notes, what Brennan perceives as a "revolving door" and "endless cycles" of treatment is the reality of rehab programs. They don't always work, and when they do, it takes time for people to change. Relapses are an expected part of treatment; they aren't a sign of failed treatment. Judges who understand that reality know that relapses are not a reason to incarcerate.

< What Politicians Do | What Happens When Your Company Goes Belly Up >
  • The Online Magazine with Liberal coverage of crime-related political and injustice news

  • Contribute To TalkLeft


  • Display: Sort:
    Must do something (none / 0) (#1)
    by KoolJeffrey on Sat Mar 28, 2009 at 12:17:23 PM EST
    One out of 31 people in this country are either in prison, on probation, or on parole. These drug sentences are ridiculous. Paying to keep users in prison is way too expensive.

    However, treatment only works if people actually want to get help. Relapse is part of the disease. There is no guarantee that these folks won't will end up right back where they started.

    Revolving Door? (none / 0) (#2)
    by squeaky on Sat Mar 28, 2009 at 12:38:19 PM EST
    That is revolving door #1 or revolving door #2. The prosecutor obviously likes the door that helps his or her career the most, which is prison.

    Unless we assume (none / 0) (#3)
    by Bemused on Sat Mar 28, 2009 at 12:55:53 PM EST
     extensive popular support among voters for imprisoning such offenders, how do you square the logic this is done to further prodecutors' careers?

      If we are going to argue in the political realm that politicians should listen to the majority that favors reform of drug laws, we have a hard time arguing that prosecutors who defy that sentiment are doing so to further their careers.

     

    Parent