3,000 Documents, or 3 Torture Memos?
Posted on Mon Mar 23, 2009 at 10:14:11 AM EST
Tags: torture, Obama Administration (all tags)
Now, look. I don't want to be pegged as a conspiracy theorist. But I find what the Obama Administration has done over the past few days with regards to some important torture-related issues a little strange.
Today we were expecting a list of documents pertaining to the contents of the interrogation tapes destroyed by the CIA. We've been waiting for it all day, and at 5:20 p.m., we got zilch, save a letter from the DOJ telling the Judge presiding over the case that they won't turn over anything.These 3,000 documents include summaries, transcripts, reconstructions and memoranda relating to the destruction of the tapes. Also withheld: the list of witnesses who may have viewed the tapes or had custody of the tapes before their destruction.
This stuck out to me because I remembered that there was a bit of excitement a few weeks ago as to what those documents contained. mcjoan wrote at the time:
The most encouraging bit from the letter: "The CIA intends to produce all of the information requested to the Court and to produce as much information as possible on the public record to the Plaintiffs." It would appear that the CIA under Panetta intends to cooperate fully in this.
Well the exact opposite happened! Here is what we will get: "The CIA will provide these lists to the Court for in camera review on March 26, 2009." It is not mcjoan's fault that the CIA completely lied, but it will be our fault if we continue to believe them.
Following directly upon this news of the massive withholding of evidence from the public (and another promise broken), the Justice Department moved to declassify three torture memos from the Bush-era. These memos will detail the legal framework for torture and the permitted techniques. It will be the ab