I think we need to modify the old saying that was derogatory of teachers and say this now

Please Ladies and Gentleman of America after watching the primary election which was very supported by the three primary networks, the new wave of technology, those very interesting and impressive shuffling of graphics by finger pointing showed obviously a massive connections to contemporary data banks that reveal an electorate in all dimensions especially economic besides political. Hopefully these data banks are not a derivative of the massive illegal wire taping.  

Do we really know what these resources are; does anyone investigate them, our media? NO, only with the transparency of this blog or others do we approach the truth. You know the mainstream media spends a lot time dancing around avoiding real truth in issues.  

What kind of bonus is paid to journalist to report free speech treachery, then hide behind the free speech shield and now the popular free speech entertainment proposition, what I am saying is just a joke has turned into a huge realization and shift in the American Lexicon. More over, what is really an outrage is the journalistic proposition to tell Americans what another person is really thinking or saying. At every turn in network discussions these journalist remark something " WITH THAT SAID" while "they" only have a chance to say it go on to tell what some else thinks. Sheesh.  

From the get go what is striking is some simple actions by Bush when first told about the tragedy of ENRON, how Bush and his administration  played a key part in oppression what went on along with the Media that helped cover up billions in lost money. That is the first flag raised in the current Bush corruption scandal. Which so far Bush and Company is getting away with.  

As an example this past day listening to Bob Brinker in Money Talks, ABC radio with an unusual expressive personal position about Congressional Legislation that was introduced in 2007. Something to do with the "UP TICK RULE" in the stock market. Please I am a poor boy and very un-knowledgeable about these laws to be able to make money, but out raged that this guy always knew about this rule or law or trick in the stock market, and just now remarks about it. In fact make the claim the insiders are "BEAR RAIDING" the market! Sheesh. After two years to first come out with this. Like that guy Steve Forbes "OH we are loosing money we need to change the rules". Don't play cards these guys. LOL.

The whole thing is even bigger than AIG which is likely loaded with right wing conservative legal lawyers from Liberty University, this is a good typical "CHENNEY "style raid, AIG is so big you can not govern them they Govern you and me no matter what. This is positioned to the place of criminal action is right in our face; give me all your money. Please this company is so big and so fouled up who is going to risk doing business with this company moving forward. The American electorate saying we want to help all the while getting kick in the derier.

The mother of all connections and conflicts of interest with likely a hidden gradient to favors that involve insider secrets and actions privy to trillion dollar deals is the knowledge Andrea Mitchell has as being the wife of former Federal Reserve Board Chairman Allen Greenspan. Who, after handing off the most conservative controlled economic department in American government gives Obama and America the biggest chunk of economic misery anyone can have.

Have we come to the point where there is no longer any doubt that CNBC and the rest of them are nothing more than observers?

Seems so.

As proof, I give you Evan Thomas, editor of Newsweek, a magazine that gave us endless fake scandals in the '90s, but who, in this transcript of a recent radio show, didn't know much of anything - aside of course about his own personal prejudices.

But the role that Cramer and other financial journalists played was incidental. There was not much they could do, anyway. They do not have subpoena power. They cannot barge into AIG and demand to see the books, and even if they could, they would not have known what they were looking at. The financial instruments that Wall Street firms were both peddling and buying are the functional equivalent of particle physics. To this day, no one knows their true worth.

"They don't know anything."

past 16 years excoriating the clintons and al gore, it doesn't leave time for much else. after all, a bj in the oval office, by a consenting adult, and made up stories about "claiming to have invented the internet" are far more entertaining to the non-human members of the "village", than actual news, which is so "very, very boring dahling".

Forty-one years ago, a satire on think-tanks was printed, called "The Report from Iron Mountain' in which the question was asked as to what would happen to American society once the Cold War was ended.

Although it was intended purely as satire, the author of the book has been largely correct in many of the possibilities, namely a massive economic melt-down that could only be prevented by engaging in equally massive government spending...such as during a (manufactured) war. All other alternatives (Universal Health Care, Universal Housing, etc.) were considered and discarded because the problems would be solved within a generation, and only add to population pressures.

But the bottom line of Cohen's piece was that we are all just supposing what happened and that the media had no way of knowing.