Nuts and Bolts of the So-Called "Meltdown"
Should the government pay a lot more than the market price?
If a bank says their junk is worth 97% of face value, Standard & Poor's says it's worth 87%, and it's selling for 38%...
What kind of fucking idiot would pay more than the market price?
That would be you and me, acting through our duly elected representatives, encouraged by the New York Times and hundreds of half-witted professors who predicted nothing and now explain everything on network TV.
Except that nobody has really bothered to explain anything beyond a few talking points repeated ad nauseam by corporate media and the shills for Goldman Sachs who happen to be running the federal government.
Question: How did we get in this mess, and how bad is it?
Answer: Garble-arble gib-gab!
But now that the screeching panic incited by Hank Paulson and his pals to stampede $700 billion out of the US Treasury and more trillions out of the Fed has subsided a wee bit, a few reasonable and even conservative economic researchers have begun to question the basic assumptions of this humongous honking boondoggle.
< How to end the foreclosure crisis now. | Trying to clear the thicket called rendition. > |