They avoid the issue as Judge Rogers states it in her first paragraph:

In Boumediene v. Bush, 128 S. Ct. 2229 (2008), the Supreme Court held that detainees in the military prison at Guantanamo Bay
("Guantanamo") are "entitled to the privilege of habeas corpus to challenge the legality of their detentions," id. at 2262, and that a "habeas court must have the power to order the conditional
release of an individual unlawfully detained," id. at 2266. Today the court nevertheless appears to conclude that a habeas court lacks authority to order that a non-"enemy combatant" alien be released into the country (as distinct from be admitted under the immigration laws) when the Executive can point to no legal justification for detention and to no foreseeable path of
release.

Perhaps this does though from the quote provided in the dairy:

With respect to these seventeen petitioners, the Executive Branch has determined not to allow them to enter the United States.

So don't put this on the courts. Put this on your guy Obama. He doesn't want them here. Nor do any other countries want them, other than China of course which their detention is protecting them from.

The courts ruling is pretty clear: the is no law allowing for the overriding of Executive decision in this case of allowing "immigrants" into the country.

And again nothing in Hamden has anything to do with this case at all. There is no military commission in the works for these guys. In fact no trial of any sort. We have even determined they are not guilty of anything we would try then for. Their problem is that they are viewed as terrorists in China and China wants us to turn them over to them. In which case they are not likely to live long. No country will take them as they are a political football. If we release them here then China is pissed and in all likelihood they would die by 'accidents' over time, not to mention that Obama doesn't want to piss of China.

But to me that is not even the issue. An order of release has been issued. The Executive Dept must comply.

But it seems that the Uyghurs are on the State Dept terrorist list, a hat tip to China.

Sabin Willett and Susan Baker Manning -- allege in the court documents that their clients' detention was one of several demands the Chinese government solicited in mid-2002 as the United States was seeking global support for toppling Saddam Hussein.

U.S. officials labeled the East Turkistan Islamic Movement (ETIM) -- a group that includes Uighur separatists who want their own nation in western China -- a terrorist organization in August 2002 after diplomatic discussions with China about Iraq, the lawyers allege.