Hillary Clinton's campaign is on its last legs after suffering a string of defeats to her rival Barack Obama. Clinton made the decision to go negative in an effort to halt Obama's rising momentum. On Saturday, she also accused Obama's campaign of using negative tactics "right out of Karl Rove's playbook" in mailers that misrepresent her positions on NAFTA and healthcare. Obama called the mailings accurate.

Today, Clinton was at a campaign rally in Providence, Rhode Island, and she mocked Obama and his message of hope and change in a very theatrical, over-the-top manner.

Watch the video from CNN below, and tell HuffPost whether you think Clinton's line of attack against Obama will help or hurt her campaign.

Where's the energy, the urgency, the drive?

Course there is another option - this is what he wants. hard to believe that one.

I still don't see how Hillary would have been any different on Afghanistan, Bush's detention policies, bank bailouts, and yes HCR.

We were provided a choice between a known corporatist Democrat and a suspected corporatist Democrat who hinted at maybe being something more, or at least capable of becoming something more.  I went with the latter.

I also thought that as far as the choice of which history-making election, that of a woman or that of an African-American, the latter  represented the higher societal hurdle that we needed to overcome.  So we did accomplish at least that, and that alone has for the first time instilled millions of Americans of color with a real feeling of inclusion.  To me that was worth Obama's election.

I would love to see a progressive woman challenge Obama in 2012.  Then maybe we can get another history making election and some real, unapologetic liberalism at long last.  

I remember hearing that and thinking, "We are doomed."

I've had a bad feeling about Obama since his much-vaunted 2004 convention speech. The next I heard of him was his condescending, progressive-bashing scold session on Kos. That was, what, 2006? All I'm saying is, who and what Obama is has been crystal clear for a long, long time and people who didn't see it were either lying to themselves or overly optimistic.

Maybe I'm just dreaming. I do know that if the current bill in either the House or Senate passes, it won't do me any good while I continue to get worse & worse. If I'm lucky, I'll be in one of those little hoverounds in the next few years. If I'm not, I'll be paralyzed & lacking enough insurance to pay for surgery may mean just that. Meantime, I'll sit carefully & try not to damage my fragile back and neck anymore. Ugh.

I supported Hillary because she knew
the realities of governing.  She also
had the experience and knew who was who
and how to pull the strings (much as FDR and LBJ did).
I knew that electing a junior Senator with
less than a term under his belt was going
to turn out this way.

I stand by my original
assessment.  Obama made it to the top
in record time because he sold himself to the interests that control the government.

Bill and Hillary paid their dues, they also fought with the powerful interests from day one.
The movers and shakers who get things done will anger many people.  That is the way it has always been.  In order to change the status quo, you have to upset it, upset those who support it.  You cannot placate it as Obama has done.

Bill's turn to the right only occured after the 1994 mid-terms where he had to deal with a hostile GOP congress.  Obama promised us that he could better deal with these thugs.  He claimed the Clintons were too divisive to do anything.  As I said before, you have be willing to agitate to get things done.