home

Saving A Man By Murdering Him

Via Digby and Lew Rockwell, a chilling story:

The Everett police officer who witnessed another cop fatally shoot a drunken man told investigators he believed the officer was frustrated before he pulled the trigger. Officer Steven Klocker said Niles Meservey was drunk and “ornery” June 10, but didn't pose an immediate, lethal threat to officer Troy Meade or anyone else.

The officers were trying to coax the intoxicated Stanwood man from behind the wheel of his Chevrolet Corvette, which was parked outside the Chuckwagon Inn, where Meservey had been drinking. [. . .] At one point, Meade told Meservey, “I don't know why the (expletive) I'm here to save your dumb (expletive) ... maybe to stop you from killing yourself driving,” Klocker recalled in a June 26 statement to detectives.

[. . .] Meade jumped back. He tossed away his stun gun, drew his handgun and opened fire. [. . .] As he pulled a dying Meservey from the Corvette, Klocker saw the stun gun probes still in the man's shoulder. Meservey, 51, died in the parking lot. He'd been struck seven times by police bullets.

(Emphasis supplied.)

< Monday Morning News and Open Thread | Negotiating Health Care Costs >
  • The Online Magazine with Liberal coverage of crime-related political and injustice news

  • Contribute To TalkLeft


  • Display: Sort:
    Only manslaughter? (5.00 / 4) (#2)
    by kdog on Mon Nov 02, 2009 at 09:15:42 AM EST
    Sounds like cold-blooded murder to me.

    I'm surprised they (none / 0) (#5)
    by Chuck0 on Mon Nov 02, 2009 at 12:13:14 PM EST
    charged the cop with anything at all. Standard modus operandi is declare that the police used necessary force to stop the threat. Obviously this guy was trying to run the cop over with his car. Killing him was the only viable way to deal with him.

    Parent
    Me too... (none / 0) (#6)
    by kdog on Mon Nov 02, 2009 at 12:37:14 PM EST
    and very surprised that a fellow cop broke the blue wall of silence.

    Parent
    he had to kill the guy, (5.00 / 1) (#3)
    by cpinva on Mon Nov 02, 2009 at 09:49:27 AM EST
    in order to save him. except, well, he didn't. according to the news story, and the police reports, the car was effectively blocked in; it couldn't go anywhere, though the deceased did attempt it.

    i'm not sure exactly who or what officer meade was attempting to save mr. meservey from. neither was officer klocker, from the report. it's also clear, from those same reports, that officer klocker made no effort to stop officer meade from murdering mr. meservey.

    note also that, immediately upon murdering mr. meservery in cold blood, officer meade invoked his garrity rights, rights which only apply to law enforcement officers, not us mere serfs.

    as well, officer meade's attorney offers, as a defense of his client's actions, that it was a

    split-second decision
    , therebye redefining the concept of the whole space-time contiuum.

    it may well have been a split-second decision, on officer meade's part. that merely means that, on the spur of the moment, officer meade decided to murder mr. meservey, not that the actual circumstances warranted the use of lethal force, or force of any kind.

    kinda like saving iraq (none / 0) (#1)
    by Turkana on Mon Nov 02, 2009 at 09:13:21 AM EST
    by destroying it. it's a mindset.

    Everett (none / 0) (#4)
    by Inspector Gadget on Mon Nov 02, 2009 at 12:04:56 PM EST
    is a very rough area. Not sure why except every metro area seems to have one. It started out as a paper mill town, then Boeing put the 747 plant there. I don't even like driving through it on the freeway to get to other towns north of it.

    Sounds like his partner isn't interested in covering for him on the circumstances that led to the murder.

    Ahem...it's blue-collar and (none / 0) (#8)
    by oldpro on Mon Nov 02, 2009 at 02:05:07 PM EST
    military.  What a combo, huh?

    I grew up in such a town...only much smaller than Everett is now.  The military is gone and the base now a beautiful state park but the paper mill is still here...aggravating the clueless newcomers who "can't breathe!"

    BTW...Everett isn't nearly as rough these days as it was during the Wobblies and the Everett Massacre.  It has quite a history...

    Parent

    Americans are Consistent (none / 0) (#7)
    by pluege on Mon Nov 02, 2009 at 12:46:30 PM EST
    Saving A Man By Murdering Him

    that's perfectly consistent with "freeing the Iraqis" by destroying their country, instigating the slaughter of half a million innocents and maiming of a million or so more, leaving behind an eon of uranium poisoning in the country's environment, and the dislocation of a quarter of the country's population from their homes. Take a deep breath and smell that American freedom.

    Same ole, same ole, Meade liberated Meservey from his life. It is the American way.  

    When the long history is written several hundred years from now (if history still exists), the golden age of America will be one of the most savage in the history of humanity, from the genocide of 10 million native Americans to the pillaging of the environment. It feels like pretty much do or die over the next 50 years. Humanity just can not survive much more American style, i.e., tea bagger style freedom.

    You forgot Vietnam where we (none / 0) (#9)
    by oldpro on Mon Nov 02, 2009 at 02:07:24 PM EST
    had to "destroy the village in order to save it!"

    Parent
    wasn't trying to capture all the (none / 0) (#11)
    by pluege on Mon Nov 02, 2009 at 04:58:06 PM EST
    self-excused American atrocities in a single post - there are just too many. I was only pointing out that Meade saving Meservey by killing him was not at all unusual for America.

    Parent
    Quite right. It wasn't really a (none / 0) (#12)
    by oldpro on Mon Nov 02, 2009 at 05:20:24 PM EST
    criticism...or at least I didn't intend it to be.  It's just that for my generation, that moment in our government's explanation of why we were doing what we did in the Vietnam War was really the quintessential moment.

    Alice Through the Looking Glass....

    Parent

    "Bad American, bad, bad American!" (none / 0) (#13)
    by MyLeftMind on Mon Nov 02, 2009 at 07:12:11 PM EST
    We Americans don't have the corner of the market on killing people. In fact, the opposite is true. Many of our immigrants came here because they were oppressed in other countries. Native Americans had some 10,000 years of killing each other, and may even have wiped out the white people who lived on this continent prior to the migrations northward from south and central America (see Kenewick man). Whoever was left after eons of tribal warfare are those who ruthlessly fought for resources. But with no written history, no white-dark skin color distinction, and no white guilt to rely on, everyone seems to overlook the violent existence that the Native Americans were already steeped in before the Spaniards came.

    America does enormous good in the world, sending vast amounts of money and resources to help people in poor and developing countries. Still, there's no question that large, powerful nations also do great damage, and many of our policies need to be changed and actions rectified (cough, war for oil). But at least the public has the ability in this nation to manage our government and promote peaceful world coexistence. Almost every group of people, from families and tribes to countries, operates in its own self interest. When conflicts arise, the strongest, wealthiest and most resourceful tend to survive at the expense of others. Conflict and power imbalances are as old as time, and likely innate to humanity.

    Even in our lifetimes, millions of people have been tortured and killed by leaders around the world who terrorize their own or nearby populations. In the last five hundred years, from Africa to Israel to Russia, the number of people oppressed, tortured, raped and killed is staggering. How about the savagery that came from the most eminently civilized Catholic Church in their terrorist mission to subdue and control populations? Surpassing the slaughter during the Crusades, the Catholic witch trials resulted in more than 20 million deaths, which far outrivals even the Nazi's Holocaust. For the entire middle ages (and up to modern times in Russia) the class system was enforced by terrorizing the lower classes. Care to guess how many heads have ended up on poles to scare the rest of the population into cooperating in the schemes to promote the rich and powerful at the expense of the rest of humanity?

    How many present-day Americans have killed others, or are even descended from someone who killed native Americans?  Not many. As with slavery, historical conflicts don't necessarily reflect today's struggles, and painting an entire country as bad is often counterproductive to solving contemporary problems. It's just silly to blame all white people for the actions of a few slave owners who bought, sold and abused Africans brought to this country as slaves. Many Europeans and Americans are descendents of slaves or serfs who were raped, tortured and terrorized by an aristocracy with the same skin color as ours. And what about the white Americans whose ancestors fought for emancipation? Are they also "bad Americans" simply because their skin color matches that of other people who did wrong?

    Really, this "America is bad" and/or "white people are bad" meme is getting old. The police abused their authority and that specific cop was in the wrong and should be charged and punished. Period.


    Parent

    Even as we are being systematically (none / 0) (#10)
    by JamesTX on Mon Nov 02, 2009 at 04:44:09 PM EST
    trained to accept more and more absurd "logic" in these matters -- desensitized to accept nonsense as common sense, I still have trouble with understanding how it is expected that a victim can control their behavior while being tortured with the device. The personal torture device manufacturers make quite a presentation of the fact that the victim loses all control of voluntary muscles. So, while he is being tortured, he can't be a threat, because he wouldn't be able coordinate a physical response. But he still needed to have a cap popped in him?