home

It's about time for a resounding "Shut Up!"

Roman Polanski might have something to answer for. There may be a defensible argument that he should be punished in some way, perhaps even beyond what he has already served. Contrary to what the bloody alarmist screamers will tell you, it isn't really amoral motivation to rise in defense of the alleged behavior of people like Polanski that causes people like me to come to his defense. Contrary to what my critics would argue, defending people like Polanski is not tantamount to "defending child rape." What really causes me, and many people like me, to come to the defense of people like Polanski is an acute understanding of a peculiar madness rampant in our current social situation. It is our awareness of how rationality, truth and justice are mutilated beyond recognition when it comes to accusations of sex-related crimes by males.

Morality, particularly moral reasoning about male sexuality, is distorted toward insanity. Occasionally, it spills fully over into obvious and actual insanity, treating us to a brief full frontal view of the nonsensical, viscous misandry that innocently masquerades as a "healthy vigilance" for sexually predatory behavior. Eric Williamson, in comparison to Polanski, doesn't much seem to have anything to answer for -- by a long shot. But if someone like Eric can be arrested, publicly humiliated and destroyed based on what happened inside and outside his private residence at 5:30 A.M. last Monday, I'm not sure any male is safe from this army of rampaging lunatics. This makes me absolutely sick.

For various reasons at various times, humans are naked. It happens to the best of us. Clothing is something we have the right to occasionally shed. It is necessary for bathing. Sometimes it is just needed for comfort, and sometimes the logistics of grooming and meeting contemporary standards of cleanliness require brief periods of nudity. If it were legal, I would challenge anyone to walk out late at night or early in the morning and make an effort to gaze into other people's homes. If you are successful (and you don't get arrested), I'll bet you will see some skin. And if you did, it seems the fault (presuming there is any fault in making such observations) would most likely lie entirely with you -- the gazer violating other people's privacy.

Our homes are very special places under our laws and traditions. I reserve the right to be naked in mine, and I don't even have to give a reason. That is at least partially what my home is for. It is a place for privacy and sanctuary from the demands of public life -- such as the requirement to be clothed at all times. It is a place where I can be comfortable, in whatever stage of dress or undress I so desire, for whatever reason I want.

Hyper-vigilance gone mad regarding male sexuality and exposure of the male body is quickly approaching a level of insanity under which the social order cannot be preserved. What happened to Eric could happen to most any man (a woman would never have been attacked), and if we stand by without protest we are aiding and abetting the emergence of a social order that isn't going to work for anybody.  This is getting out of hand. It is crazy, and it is unnatural. This poor guy is looking at being on a predator list and losing his right to function freely in society because he chose to get coffee before he got dressed.

It has to stop. It's time we start telling these people to S.T.F.U., rather than validating their neuroses about the human body through silence. Misandry, sexual repression gone insane, and bizarre anxiety and anger about male sexuality is making our world into a very difficult place. Most of us tend to go silent and let these incidents pass, mainly because of the effectiveness of the lunatic's accusation that we are "defending rape" whenever we call their behavior what it is -- insanity. It is mental illness at it's worst -- when it masquerades as reason.

The arrest of Eric Williamson is absolutely despicable. It is absurd. How much more of this are we going to be able to take before somebody has the guts to say enough is enough?

< Afghanistan is the Taliban is Afghanistan is the Taliban | Evil, and the Liberal Vocabulary >

Poll

What should happen to Eric Williamson?
He should be exonerated and awarded damages for libel and false arrest. 66%
He should be exonerated, but should alter his behavior. 0%
He should be convicted of something, but not placed on the offender list. 33%
He should be convicted of a sex crime and placed on the offender list. 0%
He should never get out of prison...ever...ever...ever...ever...ever 0%
He should be castrated. 0%
He should be executed. 0%

Votes: 3
Results | Other Polls
  • Premium Ads

  • Blog Ads

  • Contribute To TalkLeft

    donate to TalkLeft


  • Display: Sort:
    Excellent diary James.... (5.00 / 1) (#1)
    by kdog on Fri Oct 30, 2009 at 11:47:23 AM EST
    and once again I am utterly flabbergasted by an arrest...it is insanity, no ther way to explain it.  Ya can't be in naked in your own house...good grief.

    What I want to know... (none / 0) (#2)
    by MileHi Hawkeye on Fri Oct 30, 2009 at 11:56:19 AM EST
    ...is why this wannabe Gladys Kravitz isn't facing charges for being a Peeping Tom.  Just happens to out walking with some kid at 5:30am and just happens to glance in the window?  Riiiiiight.  

    [ Parent ]
    Gladys Kravitz... (none / 0) (#3)
    by kdog on Fri Oct 30, 2009 at 12:01:55 PM EST
    well played sir...nail on the head.

    No worse neighbor than a nosy neighbor...I almost wish there was a nosy neighbor database a la the sex offender database so we could identify and shame these people...but then I'd be just like this sick lady.

    [ Parent ]

    Sometimes... (none / 0) (#4)
    by MileHi Hawkeye on Fri Oct 30, 2009 at 12:19:45 PM EST
    ...that knowledge of 60's sitcoms pays off!  

    Of course, back then, a person's home was their castle.  The old man had a habit of running around the house in his jockey's.  Nobody had the gall ever be peeking in our huge living room window and ratting him out the the Man.  

    Although I may have wanted to when I had friends come over, I never did either.

    [ Parent ]

    Yours too? (none / 0) (#5)
    by kdog on Fri Oct 30, 2009 at 01:06:44 PM EST
    Too funny...my old man loved to sit at the kitchen table in his boxers...and it was not unheard of for his junk to be hanging out the trap door...luckily no one called child services.

    [ Parent ]
    Because she is (none / 0) (#6)
    by JamesTX on Sat Oct 31, 2009 at 02:00:53 PM EST
    married to a local cop.

    [ Parent ]
    Need to know the rest of the story (none / 0) (#7)
    by jbindc on Wed Nov 04, 2009 at 05:39:46 PM EST
    Apparently, someone else said she saw him twice standing in a glass door, and then a window at 8:30 in the morning as the woman was taking her kid to school (there is a school bus stop right across the street) - and him being naked in the doorway seemed to be deliberate, enough that the police arrested him.

    Police also believe there were other incidents.

    We need to wait and see how this plays out before tagging this guy as a victim.

    I can understand the lure (none / 0) (#8)
    by JamesTX on Wed Nov 04, 2009 at 07:46:05 PM EST
    of the notion of "other victims", if there had been any other complaints. In fact, it sways thinking about the issue, because it suggests there are others, when there are none as of yet, and that makes the sole complaint appear more credible. But the fact is, there weren't any other victims known, and the sole accuser is the spouse of a cop (something they have conveniently left out of many reports). When they have to start looking for the "other victims" after the fact, and after the accounts have been published and hyped by the media, I am suspect of what they might "find". The insanity driving sex offender mania tends to distort memory heavily in favor of arrest and conviction (just to be on the safe side), and I am not sure I am very much swayed by an effort to "search for victims". Victims generally don't hide, but people who ride this bandwagon tend to have creative memories.

    No (none / 0) (#9)
    by jbindc on Thu Nov 05, 2009 at 08:31:28 AM EST
    There were at least two separate complaints registered.  The first was allegedly took place at 5:30 am.  The next one allegedly occurred some morning at 8:30 am, and then it was 2 separate times - one where she claimed he was standing naked in a glass door, and then he moved to a window that faces a school bus stop.

    Now, maybe they are all full of malarkey, but I would be ticked if this happened in my neighborhood and the police didn't investigate it.

    [ Parent ]

    Investigate what? (5.00 / 1) (#10)
    by kdog on Thu Nov 05, 2009 at 09:01:10 AM EST
    the guy is in his house, he can do what he wants in his house...if anybody in the neighborhood don't like it, stop peeking through the windows and doors for christ's sake.  

    [ Parent ]
    I apologize (5.00 / 1) (#11)
    by JamesTX on Thu Nov 05, 2009 at 10:15:09 AM EST
    by default for my oversight, and I may be wrong, but I can't find any report that even suggests there were two separate incidents. There are conflicting reports of the times involved (5:30AM versus 8:30AM), but that appears to have resulted from misunderstanding by Mr. Williamson of when the alleged offense occurred, or perhaps just a typo. There is no report that I can find of any other complaining party other than the spouse of the police officer and her son, who were cutting through the Williamson's property when they saw him. They were on his property without invitation.

    Of course, the normal media hype about how there was a school bus stop near his house is just that -- fright-hype. There is no allegation of anyone at the bus stop being involved, or of anyone even being at the bus stop. It just makes for a good scary story. This is especially true with regard to his "moving" in the house. Everyone knows that naked people are supposed to remain perfectly still. They should never move about in their homes, because that is a sure sign of culpability.

    I think it is ironic and appropriate that this occurred in the context of Halloween! Perhaps these people didn't get enough entertainment out of the festivities.

    [ Parent ]