home

A World Without Prisons?

Julia Sudbury envisions a utopian world in which imprisonment is not only unnecessary, but evokes the same revulsion as slavery. Until we find a more humane way to protect society from those cannot restrain their violent impulses, however, prisons will remain a necessary evil.

That reality does not diminish Sudbury's larger point: prisons are unnecessarily inhumane, and ever-growing prison populations are not the most effective response to crime. Rather than devoting a larger share of our shrinking resources to incarceration, society's dollars would be better spent on crime prevention. Reducing poverty and providing meaningful opportunities for a sound education, affordable housing, and well-paying jobs would help combat the despair and hopelessness that breeds crime. Helping parents learn to raise children in homes that are free from violence would also have a beneficial impact on crime rates. These are not easy or inexpensive solutions to implement, but they are more worthy of investment than supermax prisons.

[more ...]

Reserving incarceration for offenders who pose a true threat would also reduce the harm that imprisonment fosters. Punishment of nonviolent offenders should focus on restitution, rehabilitation, and community supervision, not on deprivation of liberty. We need to stop using the criminal justice system to battle social problems like drug abuse and prostitution and public drunkenness. Locking people up is a simple-minded response that doesn't solve the underlying problem, and until the focus of society's response is on the cause rather than the behavior, recidivism is almost inevitable. If anything, prisons only exacerbate lawlessness by assuring that new offenders are surrounded by veteran criminals who pass along their knowledge of ways to beat society's rules.

Finally, to the extent that society needs to incarcerate the incorrigible to protect itself from harm, it has no right to dehumanize the confined. If we expect others to be respectful of our rights, we should show them the respect to which all people are entitled. Prisons should protect offenders from rape and intimidation. Prisons should provide decent health care, should screen for and treat mental illness. Prisons should not be warehouses. Prisons should provide opportunities for improvement so that offenders, upon release, will have the tools to change their lives.

We may never realize Sudbury's vision of "a world without prisons," but we should try. In the meantime, we should build a world that uses humane imprisonment as a last resort to protect society from harm.

< DA in SF Makes City Passwords Public | A Misguided Proposal to Protect IP >
  • The Online Magazine with Liberal coverage of crime-related political and injustice news

  • Contribute To TalkLeft


  • Display: Sort:
    Ummm (5.00 / 1) (#3)
    by jarober on Sat Jul 26, 2008 at 08:55:25 PM EST
    "Rather than devoting a larger share of our shrinking resources to incarceration, society's dollars would be better spent on crime prevention. Reducing poverty and providing meaningful opportunities for a sound education, affordable housing, and well-paying jobs would help combat the despair and hopelessness that breeds crime."

    If reducing poverty was all it took, then why was crime relatively low during the Great Depression? And why did it spike as we spent untold billions on the "war on poverty"?  Maybe we should get the Feds out of the anti-poverty business - getting them into it has been counter-productive.

    There were not as many children (none / 0) (#4)
    by JSN on Sat Jul 26, 2008 at 10:18:08 PM EST
    born during the great depression and I was told that the parents spent more time with their children. That was true in my case more time and very little money,

    Spike is not the correct term. US property and violent crime rates started to increase about 1964 and property crime rates grew at an unsteady rate until 1980 and then fell at a slower unsteady rate. Violent crime rates continued to grow until 1992 and then fell at a slower rate. The are huge geographical variations in crime and incarceration rates on a city block scale when you combine data for the entire county those variations are averaged out. Crime like politics is local.

    The wars on crime and poverty started about 1965 and the war on drugs in 1971. The time history of incarceration depends on the state as do the time histories of property and violent crime.
    "Tough on Crime" is probably more important than the wars of crime and drugs.

    It would be wonderful to attend a closing ceremony for a prison but I don't think I will live long enough to do that.

    Parent

    But ... but ... but ... (none / 0) (#1)
    by The Poster Formerly Known as cookiebear on Sat Jul 26, 2008 at 03:34:17 PM EST
    That's socialism! We can't have that!

    Fix the problems first (none / 0) (#2)
    by fctchekr on Sat Jul 26, 2008 at 04:24:02 PM EST
    ... just think of all the people who might commit crimes just to have a roof over their heads and health care..should we really reward people who break the law by giving them benefits they couldn't get out of prison?

    As long as there's prostitution and drug trafficking and they're illegal, and crime pays more than your nine to five job, we have a societal problem that can't be solved by making it cozier to spend time in lock-up..