home

Why Hasn't Jeffrey Weaber Been Fired?

The Huntsville Times wonders "how the Huntsville Police Department investigates itself and whether its review policy is so lacking in balance and so opaque as to undermine public confidence in it."

When an officer shoots a citizen, and the federal courts say there's strong evidence that department policies weren't followed, yet that department doesn't condemn the officer's involvement, the public must be troubled.

Ricky Scheuerman ran over Officer Jeffrey Weaber's foot. He says it was an accident. Weaber shot Sheuerman three times in the chest. That was not an accident.

An internal investigation by the HPD exonerated Weaber despite a less than stellar work record that includes "a dozen or so wrecks in his police car." A federal judge has nonetheless concluded that the evidence of misconduct is strong enough to warrant a trial in Scheuerman's lawsuit against Weaber. [more ...]

[The judge found] that Weaber violated a number of HPD policies when he stopped Scheuerman and later shot him.

Weaber was driving an unmarked car, and department policy discourage officers from making stops using such vehicles.

Weaber didn't use a blue light or siren in stopping Scheuerman.

Weaber didn't identify himself as a police officer.

He did, however, shoot Scheuerman three times in the chest, resulting a long hospital stay and huge medical bills.

As the linked editorial notes, in the absence of a civilian review board, the HPD should be prepared to explain to the public why it found no fault in Weaber's decision to fire three shots into Scheuerman's chest. Perhaps there will be more public pressure for an explanation after a jury gives Scheuerman the multi-million dollar verdict he deserves.

< Top Feminist Chef | Denver Host Committee Falls $11.6 Million Short of Fundraising Obligation >
  • The Online Magazine with Liberal coverage of crime-related political and injustice news

  • Contribute To TalkLeft


  • Display: Sort:
    Maybe, just maybe, Scheuerman's (none / 0) (#1)
    by oculus on Mon Jun 16, 2008 at 07:25:43 PM EST
    driving record is relevant.  But the officer's?  Come now.

    Relevance (none / 0) (#3)
    by TChris on Mon Jun 16, 2008 at 08:12:54 PM EST
    An officer with no history of discipline might expect more lenient treatment than an officer who had previously been demoted for reckless behavior.  

    Parent
    According to the linked editorial, (none / 0) (#5)
    by oculus on Tue Jun 17, 2008 at 12:46:46 AM EST
    the officer had been demoted previously based on a traffic collision.  

    Parent
    One of a dozen collisions (none / 0) (#6)
    by TChris on Tue Jun 17, 2008 at 08:15:25 AM EST
    Seems pretty reckless to me.

    Parent
    I'm almost certain his patrol car (none / 0) (#8)
    by oculus on Tue Jun 17, 2008 at 10:01:16 AM EST
    collects collisions from all those people who have PTSD following a contact with law enforcement.  <snark>

    Parent
    Huntsville is the South (none / 0) (#2)
    by CoralGables on Mon Jun 16, 2008 at 07:58:41 PM EST
    Having read what's available on this case, the victim has a clean record and the officer doesn't. I think that makes the records of both all the more important.

    Against police protocol, an officer in an unmarked car using no lights and no siren stops behind a car in a driveway? And possibly never identifies himself as an officer? The officer says the driver intentionally backed up over his foot. The officer shoots four times hitting him in the chest three times, and one glancing shot.

    I suspect the victim has one hell of a good case in any court outside of Huntsville now that it has been ruled the officer has no immunity.

    and how do we know it (none / 0) (#4)
    by cpinva on Tue Jun 17, 2008 at 12:39:59 AM EST
    wasn't actually a suicide attempt on the part of mr. scheurman?

    the officer will swear he identified himself, mr. scheurman will swear he didn't. mr. scheurman admits that he accidentally ran over the officer's foot, placing him in fear for his life.

    who do you think a jury in huntsville, AL is going to believe? even were there a dozen witnesses to corroborate mr. scheurman's version of events, the officer will be exonerated.

    i guarantee it.

    Well... (none / 0) (#7)
    by CoralGables on Tue Jun 17, 2008 at 09:38:30 AM EST
    Well we have an officer that isn't a patrolman, he was a bank fraud investigator from what I can find, so let me go out on a limb and say probably not in uniform.

    No lights, no siren, and court documents attest to the fact he didn't identify himself. The incident appears to come down to someone tailgating the other although who was tailgating who is in doubt. Since the victim was in front of the officer at the time of the incident I would suggest this argument will side with the victim.

    Perhaps a case of road rage involving someone with 12 accidents and someone with none?

    Still, you don't often see officers fired until the entire case is resolved. After all, he is innocent until proven guilty.

    Parent