Last night, in what looked like a direct read from the net roots, he did a segment on the sniper-gate story.  After reading through all the customary lines about how film footage shows Hillary being greeted on the tarmac, in apparent contrast to the story she told, he mentioned her campaign's statement about how she "miss-spoke."  Then, in one of his most condescending and intelligent-insulting moments, he scowled about how "miss-speaking' is identical to "saying something that isn't true."  Why exactly would be telling an apparent intelligent audience something that is universally obvious?  He was become such a Hillary-hating hack that he needs to talk down to his fans as a mother would talk to a 3-year old.  As though only HE is intelligent enough to interpret what a "miss-statement" is.  Listen up, folks; Daddy-Tweety is going to tell you what people's statements mean, and only his interpretation matters.

If that wasn't bad enough, he then began to accuse Bill Clinton of "Cutting" Obama out of the race when he talks about how good it would be to have two candidates who care about the country discussing what direction they would take ( I'm paraphrasing his comments, but you get the idea )  I can't say if Tweety is blinded by his hatred of Hillary, or just too dumb to understand Clinton's point here.  Either way, his buffoonery prompted Chuck Todd to speak up and (correctly) say that Clinton was talking about getting past all of the race recriminations and get back to real voter's issues.  But Tweety wasn't done with his loonacy yet, he cut Todd off to blurt that nobody has more baggage than the Clintons.  He just refuses to understand the meaning of words, and thinks his distorted interpretations are the only ones that matter.

The Supreme Court today said President Bush does not have to power to order state courts to reopen a death penalty case involving a foreign national because of a judgment of the World Court.

The court held 6-3 that judgments of the international court are not binding on U.S. courts and President Bush's order that courts in Texas comply anyway does not change that.

Barack Obama's campaign tossed around nearly $600 at Tiffany's last month - for a trinket that remains a secret.

Obama's team tapped his flush campaign bank account to pay the $572.25 tab at the famed jeweler last month, recently released federal fund-raising records show.

http://youtube.com/watch?v=8BfNqhV5hg4

5% from the David Brooks
http://www.nytimes.com/2008/03/25/opinion/25brooks.html?_r=2&oref=slogin&oref=slogin

For three more months, Clinton is likely to hurt Obama even more against McCain, without hurting him against herself. And all this is happening so she can preserve that 5 percent chance.

When you step back and think about it, she is amazing. She possesses the audacity of hopelessness.

Why does she go on like this? Does Clinton privately believe that Obama is so incompetent that only she can deliver the policies they both support? Is she simply selfish, and willing to put her party through agony for the sake of her slender chance? Are leading Democrats so narcissistic that they would create bitter stagnation even if they were granted one-party rule?

The better answer is that Clinton's long rear-guard action is the logical extension of her relentlessly political life.

For nearly 20 years, she has been encased in the apparatus of political celebrity. Look at her schedule as first lady and ever since. Think of the thousands of staged events, the tens of thousands of times she has pretended to be delighted to see someone she doesn't know, the hundreds of thousands times she has recited empty clichés and exhortatory banalities, the millions of photos she has posed for in which she is supposed to appear empathetic or tough, the billions of politically opportune half-truths that have bounced around her head.

Very interesting.

But I just read this comment at Taylor Marsh from a listener:

Now Rush is mocking Jeralyn Merritt of Talk left. She stated on Abrams show that they should bring a case against the voters who crossed over if they can show proof that they committed fraud and it was there intent to effect the outcome of the election.

Rush is saying that these are the people who are for Fisa laws, against Bush snooping , they want to violate their own internet privacy etc.

There are super-delegates out there talking about a different candidate, from U.S. Rep. Tim Mahoney:

"If it (the nomination process) goes into the convention, don't be surprised if someone different is at the top of the ticket," Mahoney said.  A compromise candidate could be someone such as former vice president Al Gore, Mahoney said last week during a meeting with this news organization's editorial board.  If either Clinton or Obama suggested to a deadlocked convention a ticket of Gore-Clinton or Gore-Obama, the Democratic Party would accept it, Mahoney said.

But what I do find concerning is that it reminds me a lot of the type of thing that Al Gore was pilloried for in the 2000 election.  

That he has begun a civil disobedience campaign, is big news. I am sure that his supporters have been targeted, once again.  I wish that it was just ironic that he has been, and is imo, the man most likely to bring stability to Iraq, and that the US has been trying its darnedest to eliminate him and his followers in the name of stabilizing the country.

Q: sniper fire. C: made a mistake in describing it, going in to war zone and to be careful, remember precautions but made a mistake talking about it recently, will put my experience up against Sen Obama's.

Q: Rendell.  C: Admirer, strong leadership, etc.

Q: Bosnia pattern.  C: Disagree, mistake, memory, made a mistake I'm human... for some people that's a revelation... a little laughter.

Q: Race is over.  C: I hear, people say to me don't give up and that is what I intend to do.

Q: boycott China.  Tibet is troubling, pattern by China, have raised the issue with China for years.  Admin speak out forcefully.

Q: McCain, not duty to bail out those who act irresponsibly.  Sounds like Hoover, govt has tools suited for this situaton.  Inaction ah contributed, continued inaction will exascerbate.

Q: Obama disenfranchise voters. If at convetion how is this not dis voters.  C: Wait and see, millions are going to vote, wait for outcome of votes.

Q: ? missed it.  C: Lighten up.  I was joking.  I say millions of words a week.  There's lots of room for errors when you talk

Q: Deficit.  C: One, fund part of stimulus package.  Two, Frank/Dodd could be self-financing over time.  Need experts.  Uncharted waters, not done since great depression bought mortgages. Buying mort could be considered.  Support Biden/Dodd but not complete plan.

Q: Pastor, could tone be negative personal, is it justified.  C: The relationship with pastor is personal. I was asked a personal question.  I answered what I would have done.  I was asked a direct question I gave a direct answer, not personal, what I would have done.

Here is what all Obama camp could come up with

The new book, A Time Like This, http://www.atimelikethis.us/  offers a sneak peak at what such an administration could look like.

I am not against all wars but I am against this war.