Last I heard, a good portion of the theatrical/TV/stage people who do the actual grunt work of getting shows on air (if they aren't represented by IATSE or similar unions) are represented by the Teamsters.

If he thought that Michelle really meant what it sounded like she said - if he thought he really had the goods on her, do you think he would say - "this is outrageous, I am going to launch a (rhetorical) lynch party against her".

I really doubt he would say that. And he is speaking now in the context of a major effort by others to go after her,

Y'know, leaving aside whether your reading or my reading is more accurate, it really strikes me as foolish for us to push your line. Why not broadcast my interpretation. O'Reilly is calling the Republicans racist! Turn them against eachother. His only possible defense would be to say, no! - BTD's interpretation is right - its me who is the racist. He couldn't do that, so he is in a box. And we score some points vs. the GOP.

Glenn writes:

   there probably aren't very many priorities more important than cleansing our political process of this type of dirt and petty distraction . ..

Where was Glenn when this crap was flung at the Clintons?

So, I just came up with three posts where he criticized "the crap that was flung at the Clintons."  That's exactly what you were asking for.

Now, you're saying that it's not good enough, that he had to criticize, specifically, the sexism.

Nevertheless, I think that gender clearly is part of what he's complaining about, when he says, e.g.,

But in contrast to George the Popular Jock to whom they're grateful for any attention, Hillary is the overly competitive, know-it-all girl at the front of the class with all the answers, and so instead of acting like professionals and just treating like her like a candidate running for President, and taking the opportunity to ask questions when she entered the bus, they instead band together like they're in eighth grade and give the mean, unpopular girl the cold shoulder.

Later he characterized the press as having the view that

Hillary is the cold, frigid ex-girlfriend they all want to avoid.

It is why, as brilliant AA philosophers have said, there is not what was called a "Negro problem" in this country.  It is and always has been the "whites' problem" -- so it is not for AAs but for us to solve.  And the first step is to turn inward to face why we have needed, throughout our history, to find a so-called "inferior race" to bolster our so-called "superiority."  I.e., Freud would have a field day psychoanalyzing our society.

Words are powerful tools, and the accepted meaning of the word "lynching" in pretty much all of America is that it references a black person and is meant to "keep" a black person in his place.