McCain: What If?
I don't think there's any doubt that if, as virtually universally anticipated, McCain loses the presidential election on Tuesday, it's because of two things: the economy and his choice of Sarah Palin as his vice-presidential candidate.
Columnist Earl Ofari Hutchinson puts them in perspective, by asking, what if McCain had picked Mitt Romney as his running mate. I've wondered the same thing but he says it much better and more succinctly than I would, so read it and see if you don't find yourself nodding along in agreement with his logic. I sure did. [More...]
Some quotes:
He gambled that she could bag a big swatch of disgruntled Hillary Democratic women, rev up the Christian fundamentalists, and burnish his claim to be the Washington outsider. He left Vegas with his pockets picked clean on that one.
This was the biggest single reason why long time rock solid GOP Party regulars and a slew of Reagan and W Bush and Bush Sr. appointees did the unprecedented. They jumped ship to back Obama.That never would have happened if McCain had done the personally smart and politically sensible thing and picked Mitt Romney as his VP choice.
And,
[A] big percentage of voters still said they had huge reservations about McCain, because of his age, his health. That fear led back to Palin. There was stark horror among untold numbers of voters at the thought of having her a heartbeat away from the presidency. Romney would have done a lot to take the age and health fears off the liability table.
No one is suggesting a McCain/Romney ticket would have beaten Obama. But it sure would have been a closer call than what Tuesday is likely to bring.
McCain may not have been able to do anything about the economy, but he has only himself to blame for Palin. A vote against his ticket is a well-deserved vote against his judgment
| < At Least Six Bush States Trending to Obama | Final USA Today/Gallup Poll: Obama By 11 > |





