home

Stevens Jury Deliberations on Hold

At this rate, Ted Stevens' jury may still be deliberating on Election Day.

The father of a female juror, identified only as juror No. 4, died suddenly and she is on her way to California to be with family. U.S. District Court Judge Emmet Sullivan delayed the trial until at least Tuesday to accommodate the missing juror and to allow time to determine the next step in the case.

Juror 4 may be understandably distracted and in no shape to deliberate next week. Deliberations must start anew if an alternate steps in to fill the missing juror's spot. But as more time passes, there's greater reason to worry that the alternates will watch a news story or read TalkLeft commentary or talk to a friend or otherwise become contaminated by facts they encounter outside the courtroom. Of course, that risk exists even with deliberating jurors, but it's especially difficult for alternates to stay away from the news if they think their role in the trial has probably ended.

< Fed. Appeals Court Stays Troy Davis Execution | Friday Evening Open Thread >
  • Premium Ads

  • Blog Ads

  • Contribute To TalkLeft

    donate to TalkLeft


  • Display: Sort:
    I'm glad I'm not on that jury. (5.00 / 1) (#1)
    by Teresa on Fri Oct 24, 2008 at 01:50:38 PM EST
    TChris, I just made it through my two weeks of jury duty. They only called for panels on two days. I only had to go once. The jury that I was eligible to be on was for the "UT rapist", a man who was charged with raping multiple students some time ago.

    He pled guilty, so no trial. I was looking forward to seeing the process personally so I was kind of disappointed. I guess that crime in Knoxville didn't line up time-wise for me because we've had a lot of big crimes here lately.

    I was going to say... (5.00 / 1) (#3)
    by MileHi Hawkeye on Fri Oct 24, 2008 at 02:18:10 PM EST
    ...that I'll bet you're glad you aren't on this jury--or one like it!  What a nightmare.  

    [ Parent ]
    There's more drama on the jury than in the (none / 0) (#4)
    by Teresa on Fri Oct 24, 2008 at 02:26:32 PM EST
    trial. :)

    [ Parent ]
    Teresa, have I missed your (5.00 / 1) (#5)
    by oculus on Fri Oct 24, 2008 at 02:32:43 PM EST
    reflections on jury duty?  Whaa happened?

    [ Parent ]
    Got it. (5.00 / 1) (#6)
    by oculus on Fri Oct 24, 2008 at 02:34:34 PM EST


    [ Parent ]
    Remember how I said it would be hard for (none / 0) (#7)
    by Teresa on Fri Oct 24, 2008 at 02:52:18 PM EST
    me to send someone to jail? Not this guy. I'm glad I didn't have to listen to those girls testify. That would have been hard and they had so much evidence, he just went ahead and pled with a sentence of life without parole.

    [ Parent ]
    Your report somewhat (5.00 / 1) (#9)
    by oculus on Fri Oct 24, 2008 at 04:00:51 PM EST
    restores my faith, or lack thereof, in the jury system.  

    [ Parent ]
    I'm glad you survived. (5.00 / 2) (#11)
    by TChris on Fri Oct 24, 2008 at 04:22:43 PM EST
    Maybe in a few years you'll be called for jury duty again. I'm sure you'd make a great juror.

    [ Parent ]
    I forgot my question. Can you sequester a (none / 0) (#2)
    by Teresa on Fri Oct 24, 2008 at 01:51:53 PM EST
    jury after the deliberations have already started?

    [ Parent ]
    Does the chance of a mistrial increase with this? (5.00 / 1) (#8)
    by ruffian on Fri Oct 24, 2008 at 03:39:02 PM EST
    Seems like the chances of an unsullied verdict are about nil at this point.

    Really too bad.  I hope it at least kills his re-election, since I have no doubt he is corrupt.

    If I'm not mistaken ... (none / 0) (#10)
    by Donald from Hawaii on Fri Oct 24, 2008 at 04:14:27 PM EST
    ... the four alternates were dismissed by the judge upon commencement of jury deliberations last Monday. How does one recall one or more of those alternates five days afterward?

    Coming immediately on the heels of the fracas over a disruptive juror, this has all the ingredients of a potential mistrial, which does nobody with a direct stake in the proceedings - Stevens, his family, his opponent and Alaska voters -- any good.

    The trial judge hasn't dismissed the (5.00 / 1) (#13)
    by oculus on Fri Oct 24, 2008 at 06:29:15 PM EST
    alternates:  

    AP

    [ Parent ]

    Hmm (none / 0) (#12)
    by Dalton Hoffine on Fri Oct 24, 2008 at 05:07:48 PM EST
    I wonder how these jury shennanigans will affect the Senate race. If he's found guilty, he's probably out, and if he's found innocent, then I guess he stands a much better chance of winning.

    I guess everyone who's saying that, though, is sort of assuming there will be a verdict before the Election. If there's not, do you think people will look at the shennanigans of the jury in this case and give Stevens benefit of the doubt, or be afraid that they might about elect a possibly convicted felon for another six-year term?