Your Vote for Worst Political Pundit

My vote for the worst political pundit on tv, the one who is the least informed, least qualified, most biased -- who is such a relic that all his references are to ancient events with no current relevance -- is Carl Bernstein on CNN.

He's an embarassment to CNN and he may be enough to make me switch to another channel.

Who's your least favorite pundit?

< Hillary Clinton's South Carolina Speech | Novak: A McCain-Condi Rice Ticket >
  • The Online Magazine with Liberal coverage of crime-related political and injustice news

  • Contribute To TalkLeft

  • Display: Sort:
    I would agree (5.00 / 1) (#1)
    by beefeater on Sat Jan 26, 2008 at 09:08:18 PM EST
    Carl has been running on fumes since watergate, a one hit wonder.

    Joe and Tweety (5.00 / 2) (#4)
    by athyrio on Sat Jan 26, 2008 at 09:10:14 PM EST
    get my vote

    Well, ever since his ex-wife wrote a hit movie (5.00 / 1) (#19)
    by Cream City on Sat Jan 26, 2008 at 09:21:17 PM EST
    that was such a wonderful hit on him, I can't look at him without laughing.  And he was one of my heroes for Watergate.

    Thank you, Nora Ephron (aka Meryl Streep in Heartburn).  Without you, I might have had to take your ex seriously.


    And he only makes it worse with his (none / 0) (#42)
    by oculus on Sat Jan 26, 2008 at 09:56:37 PM EST
    Stevie Wonder anecdote.  Forgiveness?

    the tag-team (none / 0) (#96)
    by canader goose on Sun Jan 27, 2008 at 09:57:50 AM EST
    Carville and Matalin.

    You can't take a word either one of them says seriously.


    And It Was Mostly Bob Woodward's Hit (none / 0) (#18)
    by BDB on Sat Jan 26, 2008 at 09:19:58 PM EST
    Not that Bob has exactly distinguished himself lately.

    I agree but now Joe Scarborough joins (5.00 / 1) (#2)
    by Teresa on Sat Jan 26, 2008 at 09:08:59 PM EST
    him. I just posted his remarks in the Hillary speech thread. I'm really angry right now. They're all pretty bad right now. Wolf probably offended me the least and I never thought I'd say that.

    Wolf (5.00 / 1) (#22)
    by diplomatic on Sat Jan 26, 2008 at 09:27:11 PM EST
    He has generally been respectful to Clinton throughout this campaign season.

    I second that opinion (5.00 / 2) (#3)
    by magster on Sat Jan 26, 2008 at 09:09:20 PM EST
    Scarborough's obnoxious tonight, though.

    This is what he said... (5.00 / 2) (#6)
    by Teresa on Sat Jan 26, 2008 at 09:12:38 PM EST
    Scarborough just said that Hillary congratulated Obama on a piece of paper and then sent her husband out to speak for her. I cannot believe this. I'm am truly angry.

    Well, I said the last two sentences.


    Margaret Carlson (5.00 / 2) (#5)
    by horseloverfat on Sat Jan 26, 2008 at 09:11:15 PM EST
    Watched her tonight, just ignorant and silly.

    Hands down Margaret Carlson (none / 0) (#16)
    by Molly Bloom on Sat Jan 26, 2008 at 09:18:43 PM EST
    Though Joe is working hard to catch up

    Margaret Carlson (5.00 / 1) (#24)
    by chrisvee on Sat Jan 26, 2008 at 09:29:51 PM EST
    is now claiming that Hillary's resiliency is the reason voters question whether she has a heart.  This is the sort of thing that has (for me) a whiff of sexism.  Would she make that same speculation about a man?  Or would the very resiliency be seen as evidence of the heart, rather than its absence?

    Women traitors (none / 0) (#83)
    by lily15 on Sat Jan 26, 2008 at 11:32:36 PM EST
    You notice all the cable shows find women to trash Hillary...it almost makes me want to get in a mud wrestling match with them...or slap them around..But then...they're getting paid well to be betrayers...It should make us all fight harder and tougher.

    It's a Hobsons choice (5.00 / 1) (#7)
    by white n az on Sat Jan 26, 2008 at 09:12:47 PM EST
    Carl Bernstein is awful, but you're picking on one of the talking heads that doesn't get much time.

    CNN is awful. I wouldn't suggest that Wolf Blitzer or John King are exactly astute politically and these are the 'senior' political staff.

    There's some serious griping on another diary here about MSNBC.

    Face it...television coverage is pretty weak.

    It could be worse, CNN could resurrect Crossfire

    Hard to Pick (5.00 / 3) (#9)
    by chrisvee on Sat Jan 26, 2008 at 09:14:46 PM EST
    Pretty much everyone is irritating me tonight.  I could give Carl my vote, though, as the worst of the lot.   Perhaps followed closely by Bill Bennett.

    Tonight has been a new low for MSNBC and CNN.  Substance-free coverage.

    I cannot even think about listening to Bennett (none / 0) (#12)
    by robrecht on Sat Jan 26, 2008 at 09:16:11 PM EST
    I'll second Bill Bennett (none / 0) (#14)
    by joejoejoe on Sat Jan 26, 2008 at 09:17:20 PM EST
    Kent Dorfman has more on the ball.

    Wow....what a choice! (5.00 / 1) (#10)
    by Pat on Sat Jan 26, 2008 at 09:15:00 PM EST
    So many a-holes, so little time! Who'd 'a thunk Pat Buchanan would speak honestly about this travesty......

    But yes, Carl is AWFUL. And Margaret Carlson proves that women can oink just as loud as men...

    No one knows nothin' (5.00 / 1) (#11)
    by andgarden on Sat Jan 26, 2008 at 09:15:05 PM EST
    I actually have a special place in my unheart for
    Donna Brazile.

    But the mendacious ones. . . I'm with you on C. Bar. and I would add Bill Bennett.

    Bill Bennett (5.00 / 2) (#15)
    by BDB on Sat Jan 26, 2008 at 09:18:35 PM EST
    Is a sexist, racist partisan hack.  The one thing I will say in his defense is that I seriously doubt any democrat would be moved one inch based on anything he says.  If I were Obama I'd beg him to stop saying nice things about me.  

    Gloria Borger (5.00 / 1) (#13)
    by BDB on Sat Jan 26, 2008 at 09:16:51 PM EST
    From what I could tell not a single thing she said was factually true.  

    Frankly, I thought very nearly every single CNN commentator sounded like a complete idiot tonight.  It's like they can't simply say  good things about Obama, who totally deserved it tonight, they have to trash the Clintons at every chance whether the facts support it or not.  They seemed so gleeful to be able to - at least for tonight - be able to write Clinton's political obituary again.  

    And I'm not sure they help Obama.  They are very close to doing the exact same thing they did to HRC before NH.

    If this is the best political team on television, then that explains a lot about the last eight years.

    I'm sick of her too. At this point, Fox (none / 0) (#20)
    by Teresa on Sat Jan 26, 2008 at 09:22:14 PM EST
    News can't be any worse than the lie Joe S. just told on MSNBC and all the rest of them on that station and CNN. At least we know their viewpoint.

    Joshua Marshall... (5.00 / 1) (#17)
    by Dan the Man on Sat Jan 26, 2008 at 09:19:41 PM EST
    For his doctrine of Bill Clinton Exceptionalism (which is just an excuse for CDS).

    Marshall is a bit unhinged (none / 0) (#43)
    by Xeno on Sat Jan 26, 2008 at 09:59:17 PM EST
    about the Clintons. Deranged, even. That screed was shrill and rather unlike Marshall's usual bland centrist tone. CDS does that to people, I guess.

    second (none / 0) (#44)
    by Stellaaa on Sat Jan 26, 2008 at 10:00:18 PM EST
    Carl worst (5.00 / 1) (#21)
    by PlayInPeoria on Sat Jan 26, 2008 at 09:23:49 PM EST
    but Joe is bad.

    Tweety (5.00 / 1) (#25)
    by byteb on Sat Jan 26, 2008 at 09:31:22 PM EST
    Even though he wasn't on tonight, I kept imagining all the stupid offensive things he would have said. Talk about getting inside your head.

    Geraldo is on Fox News (5.00 / 1) (#32)
    by Jeralyn on Sat Jan 26, 2008 at 09:41:40 PM EST
    covering South Carolina. It really makes me miss the days of "Rivera Live."  

    Willowbrook (none / 0) (#52)
    by joejoejoe on Sat Jan 26, 2008 at 10:11:54 PM EST
    I know Geraldo has his detractors but he did more good with his reporting on the abuses of the developmentally disabled at Willowbrook State School in NYC than just about any reporter in the last century. I think Geraldo's reporting on Willowbrook had as large an effect on society as Upton Sinclair's 'The Jungle'. Geraldo made his bones as a reporter on that for me and any goofiness that came after doesn't amount to much.

    Ms. Carlson just said that (5.00 / 1) (#38)
    by Teresa on Sat Jan 26, 2008 at 09:51:05 PM EST
    "Bill Clinton went on into Obama's speech and that is just not done." Oh gee, I didn't realize he was giving a concession speech and they were holding the cameras for Obama until he finished. This is ridiculous. He was giving a stump speech. Was he supposed to stop and wait on Obama and then get back to the people in Missouri?

    the pundits in their little isolated worlds (5.00 / 1) (#57)
    by hellothere on Sat Jan 26, 2008 at 10:18:22 PM EST
    don't get it. i didn't even watch tv tonight. i have cable and new televison, and now i am wondering why i even bought it. well yes, there is discovery, the history channel and some others.

    we all need to send olbermann an email taking him to task.

    IMO (5.00 / 1) (#59)
    by athyrio on Sat Jan 26, 2008 at 10:19:41 PM EST
    we are all being played like a fine violin by the republicans, and if we dont wise up, we lose big time in November....I hope we wise up soon before it is too late and it already might be....

    I second it... (5.00 / 1) (#63)
    by Stellaaa on Sat Jan 26, 2008 at 10:27:26 PM EST
    The issues get buried

    Easier Question - Who doesn't suck? (5.00 / 1) (#62)
    by Dave Latchaw on Sat Jan 26, 2008 at 10:25:32 PM EST
    Keith Olbermann because he saves most of his punditry for his own show. Eugene Robinson, a charming and witty man who always gets talked over because he's not a jerk. Rachel Maddow - she just rocks.

    The folks on The Newshour (none / 0) (#72)
    by Judith on Sat Jan 26, 2008 at 10:41:47 PM EST
    - headed by Lehrer and Ifill and Warner and a few of the wonderful field contibutors.  You people glued to cable are rotting your circuits.  They ahve to compete for who is more revolting to get your eyeballs.

    That's about the truth Judith. (none / 0) (#75)
    by Teresa on Sat Jan 26, 2008 at 10:44:32 PM EST
    I guess Pat Buchanan is the only one who didn't tick me off tonight and that's sad.

    yikes - sure is! (5.00 / 1) (#77)
    by Judith on Sat Jan 26, 2008 at 11:04:52 PM EST
    Thread Cleaned (5.00 / 1) (#76)
    by Jeralyn on Sat Jan 26, 2008 at 10:53:37 PM EST
    of off-topic criticisms of other blogs. This post is clearly about the tv coverage we saw tonight. To make it clearer, I added the word "tv" to political pundit above.

    Please, stay on topic. Thanks.

    Bernstein was embarrassing (5.00 / 1) (#79)
    by lily15 on Sat Jan 26, 2008 at 11:23:27 PM EST
    Jeff Toobin knocked him down immediately...fortunately...All of them on MSNBC and CNN were awful...and there I was...hanging on every word from Pat Buchanan..wondering...how did we get to the place where Pat Buchanan was the only one showing respect for Hillary and Bill...Olbermann was disappointing...Howard Fineman..wimpy turd extraordinaire..Margaret Carlson...such sycophants and paid tools...Gene Robinson...embarrassing...and there I go again...returning to Pat Buchanan to hear someone stand up to these morons..this is surely an upside down world.

    Olberman quite disappointing, yes -- (5.00 / 1) (#91)
    by Cream City on Sun Jan 27, 2008 at 12:54:30 AM EST
    he was pretty much shut down by Tweets previously, out of chagrin, perhaps.  But tonight, Olbermann joined in . . . and I fear that he ought to stick to shtick, after all.

    So that's it, nothing left, I'm off MSNBC.


    Could not (5.00 / 1) (#92)
    by athyrio on Sun Jan 27, 2008 at 01:00:36 AM EST
    agree with you more Cream....I was deeply disappointed in KO....

    Bill Bennett (5.00 / 1) (#80)
    by lily15 on Sat Jan 26, 2008 at 11:24:53 PM EST
    What a joke...a real reprobate raving joyous about Obama...does that tell us something?

    when he talks about morality (none / 0) (#89)
    by Stellaaa on Sat Jan 26, 2008 at 11:49:31 PM EST
    Sometimes he opens his mouth and talks about morality and ethics.  See this is when I go nuts, a man in power like him lies, distorts and then is rehabbed, he gives a fake apology, they tag it "failure in judgement"  but a poor kid who commits a crime: "zero tolerance".

    Failure in judgement..the get out of jail free card for the priveleged.  


    quite a few (none / 0) (#8)
    by Jeralyn on Sat Jan 26, 2008 at 09:14:16 PM EST
    readers agree with me here.

    Carl Bernstein (none / 0) (#27)
    by BDB on Sat Jan 26, 2008 at 09:33:31 PM EST
    is loathsome.  The only good thing about him is that he hasn't said that much and when he has he's seemed drunk to me.  Is that just me?

    Oddly, I thought his bio of Hillary wasn't all that bad, not terrific, but not terrible.  Certainly not the hatchet job that others have written (although many of his sources during the Clinton White House years were clearly trying to even scores).  Of course,  I also suspected as I read it that it was written mostly by his assistants and not by him.

    Even Bill Schneider seemed off tonight.  He described African Americans as THE democratic base.  Now, certainly, African Americans are an important part of the democratic base, but they're hardly the entire base, not even in South Carolina where they make up a larger than normal part of the party.

    I didn't watch MSNBC, but CNN should be ashamed of themselves.  All of the candidates deserved better than what they got tonight.


    Well, if we're gonna get demographic, it's women (none / 0) (#35)
    by Cream City on Sat Jan 26, 2008 at 09:46:58 PM EST
    who are the Democratic base.

    Have been voting more than men since 1952, and 54 percent of voters last time, and even more so (I have seen varying numbers) on the Dem side.

    Any numbers on AAs on the Dem side?  Guessing we have perhaps three-fourths of them, and they're 12-plus percent of the population nationwide, that's 9 to 10 percent of Dems IF we get half the voters (and if voters are representative of the population by race and gender).  But it's late, maybe my math is off.

    Bottom line, we need to not alienate any Dems -- not with any more stupid race-and-gendered memes that presume that's how we vote.  After all, 20 percent of AAs in South Carolina voted for a white  tonight, and a lot of women voted for men again.

    Demographics are useful to Dems, but only to a point.  A lot of Dems clearly voted on issues -- and that included a lot who voted for their own race or gender, but not for that reason.


    Bizarro Fantasy League (none / 0) (#28)
    by Klio on Sat Jan 26, 2008 at 09:37:32 PM EST
    too many to choose from!

    But my vote is Gloria Borger.   Not b/c of anything overly egregious tonight, but because she's actually capable of so much better than we get from her.

    What a universal waste.  

    misread the rules (5.00 / 1) (#36)
    by Klio on Sat Jan 26, 2008 at 09:49:45 PM EST
    Jeralyn asked for least informed, least qualified ... and I voted on most hacktacular.

    Hmmm, I may have to go with a tie between Margaret Carlson and Bill Bennett.

    In any event, now I need to wash my teevee set with bleach.  'night all.


    make your own rules (none / 0) (#41)
    by Jeralyn on Sat Jan 26, 2008 at 09:55:28 PM EST
    as to what makes the worst political pundit. Those were just mine for naming Bernstein.

    Hacktacular: Great Word! (none / 0) (#94)
    by robrecht on Sun Jan 27, 2008 at 08:54:23 AM EST
    well mine goes (none / 0) (#29)
    by Jgarza on Sat Jan 26, 2008 at 09:40:01 PM EST
    Pat Buchanan  

    No, Pat has his biases (5.00 / 1) (#33)
    by horseloverfat on Sat Jan 26, 2008 at 09:41:44 PM EST
    but at least he shows flickers of intelligence

    He loves (none / 0) (#37)
    by Jgarza on Sat Jan 26, 2008 at 09:50:17 PM EST
    Clinton, thinks it is brilliant that they "painted Obama as the Black candidate."

    SO insulting to Obama, Hillary and Democrats.


    The Media (none / 0) (#45)
    by horseloverfat on Sat Jan 26, 2008 at 10:00:52 PM EST
    Painted BO as the Black Candidate.  BO let it happen, should have acted to squelch it.  Bad judgment, BO.

    right he is too (none / 0) (#54)
    by Jgarza on Sat Jan 26, 2008 at 10:12:50 PM EST
    block now, that is why he got 45 percent of the vote in Nevada.  

    so you have the same biases as Pat Buchanan, except you blame the media and not the Clintons. niice


    Was watching TV last night (none / 0) (#60)
    by horseloverfat on Sat Jan 26, 2008 at 10:20:38 PM EST
    Saw some Obama supporter get asked whether the Clintons were playing the race card.  The guy ducked the question, said he didn't know if they were or not.

    Regardless of what they think the Clinton campaign might be doing, the BO spokespeople should be smart enough to bat down questions like that to take race off the table.  But I never see them do anything but let these race insinuations just sit there and fester.  Strategically unwise, like Charlie Rangel said.


    William Kristol (none / 0) (#31)
    by Skank on Sat Jan 26, 2008 at 09:41:40 PM EST
    The guy has never been right and he's a lying sack of sh*t.

    The typical Obama supporter in the blogs (none / 0) (#34)
    by Stellaaa on Sat Jan 26, 2008 at 09:44:33 PM EST
    Not that I am partisan or anything, they are disturbing.  

    Andrea Mitchell, Russert and these days Ed Schultze he is so anti Hillary he will get a Limbaugh style head.  

    my pundits are all favorites (none / 0) (#40)
    by chemoelectric on Sat Jan 26, 2008 at 09:55:27 PM EST
    To be frank I pay attention only to pundits with names like Jeralyn and Armando and Glenn and Joshua Micah, and none of them is a least favorite in this way. Why waste my time with TV idiots? The only one I bother with is Olbermann and then only when he does a Special Comment, and those can be downloaded.

    If Only I Had A TV.... (none / 0) (#46)
    by squeaky on Sat Jan 26, 2008 at 10:01:07 PM EST
    I guess I am out of touch since I have never have seen or heard most of these creeps.  Being blogocentric has its advantages.

    I'm tempted to join you, at least on (5.00 / 1) (#56)
    by Teresa on Sat Jan 26, 2008 at 10:16:37 PM EST
    the news part. I'm weaning myself from DailyKos, I've mostly given up Hardball so I'm getting there. Tonight was just awful as far as fair media coverage. I'm just ready for this election to be over.

    I'm so thankful for this place.


    Yes TL Rocks (5.00 / 1) (#58)
    by squeaky on Sat Jan 26, 2008 at 10:19:38 PM EST
    I do not think I have missed anything not having a tv. Alas, very soon the tv will be obsolete and all the stuff will be streaming over the internet.

    I was struck by the huge amount of (none / 0) (#48)
    by oculus on Sat Jan 26, 2008 at 10:05:44 PM EST
    laughter amongst the talking heads  What's so funny?  Also, didn't see it tonight, but have in the past re post-debate coverage:  everyone is talking at once.  Not too effective.

    they are giddy Clinton "lost" (5.00 / 1) (#66)
    by diplomatic on Sat Jan 26, 2008 at 10:32:29 PM EST
    After she won NH it was a lot of long faces.  After Nevada also.  Especially Donna Brazille.

    After Obama campaign's complaints (none / 0) (#70)
    by oculus on Sat Jan 26, 2008 at 10:37:43 PM EST
    about Carville and the other fellow whose name I don't remember, shouldn't Donna be excused for the duration of the Dem. primary at least?

    Not a fan of Carville.... (none / 0) (#71)
    by Stellaaa on Sat Jan 26, 2008 at 10:41:40 PM EST
    Don't like his wife so I don't care.  Bagalia is sort of ok.   But should Dick Morris still be on tv?  

    And Roland Martin, please?? (none / 0) (#73)
    by Teresa on Sat Jan 26, 2008 at 10:42:56 PM EST
    Carville couldn't possibly love the Clintons more than Roland does Obama. They are being hypocritical there. I agree with the Carville and Begala decision but they've replaced one side with the other.

    Good point but (5.00 / 1) (#93)
    by Big Tent Democrat on Sun Jan 27, 2008 at 06:27:38 AM EST
    Martin is not advising Obama.

    It's tribalism (none / 0) (#49)
    by horseloverfat on Sat Jan 26, 2008 at 10:06:43 PM EST
    Groupthink.  So many do, so the rest join in, to be part of the Kewl Kidz.

    speaking of the media and tweety (none / 0) (#50)
    by athyrio on Sat Jan 26, 2008 at 10:09:12 PM EST
    this is a really interesting link

    This tells me that the media is trying to get rid of HRC, as they view her as the most troubling to defeat in the fall...They are trying to sabatage her campaign.....my god the media is in charge of us if we dont start protesting!!!!!!

    Ed is vindictive. HRC doesn't grace his show often (none / 0) (#53)
    by Molly Bloom on Sat Jan 26, 2008 at 10:12:26 PM EST
    enough for him. So he attacks her. He's admitted as much in the past.

    Don't know about Miller.

    Schultz (none / 0) (#55)
    by Stellaaa on Sat Jan 26, 2008 at 10:16:02 PM EST
    has gone off the deep end.  He is totally disgusting these days.  

    I think (none / 0) (#69)
    by Kathy on Sat Jan 26, 2008 at 10:36:21 PM EST
    they hate Clinton for the same reason they will eventually hate Obama.  They are buying his stump speech, but soon they will find out that he is really a politician--worse, a human being--and they will realize how foolish they were, and they will turn on him.

    Worst pundit (none / 0) (#78)
    by delandjim on Sat Jan 26, 2008 at 11:23:17 PM EST
    Tucker, need I say more?

    The quality of talk TV is degenerating (none / 0) (#81)
    by lily15 on Sat Jan 26, 2008 at 11:28:52 PM EST
    Alan Colmes was good.  He's getting better every day..and couldn't be bullied. And I love Craig Crawford...the only one now on MSNBC other than Buchanan for straight talk..  I was watching Fox because CNN and MSNBC were so awful. Colmes really stood up to Hannity tonight...interesting

    where is craig crawford? (none / 0) (#82)
    by Judith on Sat Jan 26, 2008 at 11:31:15 PM EST
    usually?  I thought he was print...?

    MSNBC but I don't think he was on tonight. (none / 0) (#84)
    by Teresa on Sat Jan 26, 2008 at 11:33:29 PM EST
    Read BTD's thread from this morning about him. It was good.

    I had seen it - (5.00 / 1) (#85)
    by Judith on Sat Jan 26, 2008 at 11:35:44 PM EST
    but I did not know whether he was associated with them or if he just visited that one time.  He seemed too normal and rational to be on tee vee other than PBS.  

    ps - thanks (5.00 / 1) (#86)
    by Judith on Sat Jan 26, 2008 at 11:36:39 PM EST



    You're welcome. He's on Hardball (none / 0) (#87)
    by Teresa on Sat Jan 26, 2008 at 11:39:41 PM EST
    all the time and I guess Morning Joe but I don't watch that one. I don't watch Hardball much either since the primaries started.

    ahhhh. okay (5.00 / 1) (#88)
    by Judith on Sat Jan 26, 2008 at 11:43:51 PM EST

    Jeez, I feel so out of touch with popular culture. :-)


    DICK MORRIS (none / 0) (#90)
    by piniella on Sat Jan 26, 2008 at 11:58:18 PM EST
    His hatred of the Clintons, especially Hillary, is disgusting.

    I think I have changed my mind. (none / 0) (#95)
    by Rene ala carte on Sun Jan 27, 2008 at 09:17:55 AM EST
    While just about everyone mentioned deserves the title of "worst", I think I'll have to go with Cokie Roberts as the most vacuous and useless.

    cokie roberts (none / 0) (#97)
    by canader goose on Sun Jan 27, 2008 at 10:01:13 AM EST
    again, you can't did Cokie without slapping Steve around too.  If anything, he's worse.

    that flower arrangement (none / 0) (#98)
    by Judith on Sun Jan 27, 2008 at 01:44:52 PM EST
    it truly lovely!

    You still watch CNN. (none / 0) (#99)
    by LANGX on Sun Jan 27, 2008 at 09:29:22 PM EST

    worst pundit (none / 0) (#100)
    by auden on Fri Feb 01, 2008 at 05:08:50 PM EST
    gee there are so many to pick from this political season...

    i do agree that Carl Bernstein's visceral hatred of the Clinton's is so disgusting that when he talks as if he knows what Hillary is thinking and what she is doing before she does it.... it smacks of misogyny at it's worst.

    in his after debate critique he looked like an overblown bullfrog... and sounded like a fog horn.

    on another note.. i think the media is so against hillary out of frustration of not knowing how to critique barack since he is black... and they fear the racist backlash that will dry up their sponsorship... so smack the woman... misogyny is so much easier to get away with... as well as these men are woman haters...

    disclosure... (none / 0) (#101)
    by auden on Fri Feb 01, 2008 at 05:10:42 PM EST
    should it not be disclosed that Carl Bernstein wrote a scathing book on Hillary and had it published this month?... come on CNN ...