home

Today's Question

By TChris, Section Crime in the News
Posted on Fri Jan 18, 2008 at 10:49:22 PM EST
Tags: (all tags)
Share This: Digg! StumbleUpon del.icio.us reddit reddit

Since President Bush doesn't believe that lying to federal investigators or grand jurors really deserves punishment (at least in the case of his friend and fellow rascal Scooter Libby), do you suppose he'll commute the sentences of Pro Bowl defensive lineman Dana Stubblefield or Olympic medalist sprinter Marion Jones?

Oh, and to all the disgruntled Republicans who complained that nobody gets charged or convicted or punished for what Scooter Libby did -- tell that to Stubblefield and Jones.

< Death Sentence Commuted After Lawyer Receives Permission to Reveal Misconduct | Cheney Deposition Sought in Colorado Over Alleged Assault >

  • The Online Magazine with Liberal coverage of crime-related political and injustice news

  • Contribute To TalkLeft


    • Display: Sort:
    Today's Question | 9 comments (9 topical)

    Readers Must Login or Create an Account to Comment

    simply put, he isn't (5.00 / 2) (#3)
    by cpinva on Fri Jan 18, 2008 at 11:52:41 PM EST
    Simply put, the man is innocent.

    but then, you already know that. really, just because you continue to shout the big lie, that won't make it true. i kid you not.

    just about anything bush does is

    the least he could do

    that's been pretty much proven, repeatedly, since his inauguration.

    I nominate this (5.00 / 1) (#4)
    by Wile ECoyote on Sat Jan 19, 2008 at 06:44:58 AM EST
    for comedy post of the month.  This has to be an Onion submission that was rejected.  

    I agree Jim's assertion is laughable. (5.00 / 1) (#5)
    by Molly Bloom on Sat Jan 19, 2008 at 08:24:35 AM EST
    Some people just can't face facts.

    Parent
    I would say that (1.00 / 0) (#2)
    by jimakaPPJ on Fri Jan 18, 2008 at 11:21:39 PM EST
    since Libby was the victim of a political agenda, what Bush did was the least he could do.

    Simply put, the man is innocent.

    hehe (1.00 / 0) (#6)
    by jimakaPPJ on Sat Jan 19, 2008 at 08:32:21 AM EST
    The man was prosecuted for supposedly committing perjury and obstruction about something that was not a crime, and if you want to claim that it was, had been done by others, and admitted by others as soon as the investigation started.

    All done in a hot house of MSM articles and charges.

    BTW - what has happened to the big lawsuit that Mr and Mrs Wilson was bringing??

    Yadda DA (none / 0) (#8)
    by jimakaPPJ on Sat Jan 19, 2008 at 09:50:06 PM EST
    The fact is that it was the aggressive politically driven investigation about a non-crime.

    All the rest is smoke and mirrors.

    hehe

    Parent

    Boy, you sure spend (none / 0) (#10)
    by jimakaPPJ on Sun Jan 20, 2008 at 11:45:42 AM EST
    a lot of time trying to deny the obvious.

    The whole deal was driven by a political agenda.

    Any reasonable person can see that.

    But then again, you aren't..

    So tehehe and yadda yadda. Go bite someone else's ankle.

    Parent

    Or THe Invisible Man (5.00 / 0) (#12)
    by squeaky on Mon Jan 21, 2008 at 02:20:50 PM EST


    Parent
    Question (none / 0) (#1)
    by BDB on Fri Jan 18, 2008 at 11:09:12 PM EST
    I presume your question is rhetorical.

    Today's Question | 9 comments (9 topical)

    Readers Must Login or Create an Account to Comment