Hispanics and Blacks: Another Race-Fueled Contest?
Just when Hillary and Obama called a truce on the race issue, the New York Times brings it up again, in the context of the tension between Latino and Hispanics and African Americans.
Shorter version: The article plays to stereotypes and says Clinton has the edge because Latinos are strong on motherhood and identify with Clinton.
Mr. Obama, some party officials and scholars suggested, may face additional difficulty if Hispanic women respond to Mrs. Clinton’s increasingly strong appeal for support based on sex. A rally here Saturday was packed with Hispanic women who shrieked at seeing Mrs. Clinton.
“The Hispanic community is very family oriented, and we respect our mothers,” said Ruben Kihuen, an influential Democratic assemblyman from Las Vegas who supported Mrs. Clinton. “A lot of middle-aged women see her as a mother, a head of the household, and they can identify with this. Especially when they see her daughter, Chelsea, with her.”
On the other hand, it says, Obama, who has taken to joining the crowds' "Si se puede" chants at his campaign appearances, is doing okay.
Fanning the flames is Al Sharpton: [more...]
The Rev. Al Sharpton of New York, who has been on the front line of many of the black-Latino battles in New York politics, said the tension would be a problem for Mr. Obama across the country and in New York, which also votes on Feb. 5. He said Mr. Obama would be at a disadvantage because of his choice to be a “race-neutral candidate.”
“It’s going to be a challenge that he has got to deal with,” Mr. Sharpton said. “There’s a natural history, and we’ve made some progress. But he has not been part of those efforts to make progress.”
Then there's Obama supporters, like State Senate majority leader, Gloria Romero of East Los Angeles, who bash Hillary:
“I don’t think eating tacos,” is effective, she said with a flick at Mrs. Clinton. “We need to address what unites us. The key is not to raise the wedge issue.”
Ok, let's talk about the issues. How are the two candidates different on issues of importance to this increasingly influential group of voters? Which one has proposed a policy for them to rally behind? Who's got the better track record?
We'll all be better off if we keep the discussion on that level.
| < Welcome News From the Bush Administration On Deportation of Offenders | Kerry's Baseless Attack On Hillary Clinton > |





