home

Reactions to Gonzales' Resignation

We'll be updating reactions to Attorney General Alberto Gonzales' resignation as the day goes on. Gonzales' last day will be September 15.

Update: Democratic candidates weigh in.

Update: Charles Schumer's live statement: Touts himself three times for first calling for Gonzales' resignation. Who cares? Says the Justice Department has been in complete disarray. As I've said many times, that's just not the case. Life has gone on as usual in courtrooms all across America. Insists on a replacement that "will uphold the rule of law." A platitude. Says Dems will work with the White House on a replacement, urges them to seek out Dems' advice.

John Edwards: (live interview on CNN)Doesnt' think Chertoff should be the replacement. "We shouldn't replace the person responsible for Guantanamo with the person responsible for the aftermath of Katrina."

Harry Reid: Was never the right man for the job.... He lacked the spine to say no to Karl Rove.

More...

People for the American Way:

“It’s high time this attorney general resigned. Alberto Gonzales was the 'Enabler General' for the imperial Bush presidency. He undermined the Constitution, made a mockery of the rule of law, and turned the Justice Department into an arm of the Bush Administration’s political operation.

Update: ACLU weighs in.

“Alberto Gonzales will follow Mitchell Palmer as one of the worst attorneys general in U.S. history,” said Anthony D. Romero, ACLU Executive Director. “But Gonzales’ resignation doesn’t put an end to the widespread abuse of executive powers. The White House may claim that Gonzales’ resignation restores the rule of law, but if anything, his departure highlights the need for increased scrutiny and accountability.”

....This man, who swore to uphold the Constitution, instead flouted it, and consistently put partisan political considerations over the rule of law,” said Caroline Fredrickson, Director of the ACLU Washington Legislative Office. “He twisted our Constitution and created a legal framework that paved the way for tremendous and growing abuses of power by the executive branch. He spied on Americans, attempted to justify torture, and worked to strip away our most sacred rights and freedoms – all to further the president’s political agenda. Congress must not accept Gonzales as the administration’s latest sacrificial lamb. Congress must conduct more oversight and restore our Constitution, our world status and American values.”

< Gonzales Resigns | Michael Vick Pleads Guilty, Makes Public Apology >
  • The Online Magazine with Liberal coverage of crime-related political and injustice news

  • Contribute To TalkLeft


  • Display: Sort:
    i don't know about lack of spine, (none / 0) (#1)
    by cpinva on Mon Aug 27, 2007 at 09:59:45 AM EST
    but he certainly lacked the intellectual chops for the job. rightly or wrongly, we expect the AG to at least appear to be a legal whiz kid. mr. gonzales never came close. for the most part, he gave the distinct impression that he was totally clueless, both about the law, and the operation of his own agency.

    he joins the manager for the enron audit, from arthur anderson, in having trashed his profession in a highly public manner. it will take DOJ years to recover from his terrible "leadership".

    We do? (none / 0) (#4)
    by Deconstructionist on Mon Aug 27, 2007 at 11:23:01 AM EST
    "we expect the AG to at least appear to be a legal whiz kid."

      these are the AGs in my lifetime. how many "legal whiz kids" do you identify?

    William Rogers  
    Robert F. Kennedy
    Nicholas  Katzenbach
    Ramsey Clark
    John Mitchell
    Richard G. Kleindienst
    Elliot L. Richardson
    William B. Saxbe
    Edward H. Levi
    Griffin Bell
    Benjamin R. Civiletti
    William French Smith
    Edwin Meese
    Richard L. Thornburgh
    William Barr
    Janet Reno
    John Ashcroft
    Alberto Gonzales

    Parent

    Whiz kids? None (none / 0) (#5)
    by Big Tent Democrat on Mon Aug 27, 2007 at 11:41:13 AM EST
    Excellent lawyers? some.

    Parent
    Yes, some... (none / 0) (#6)
    by Deconstructionist on Mon Aug 27, 2007 at 11:49:45 AM EST
     but hardly enough to make me expect legal whizzes --or even apparent legal whizzes. Additionally, there are definitely enough purely political appointments to rebut the perception that extraordinary  legal ability was historically  a prequisite.

    Parent
    He lacked the spine to say no to Karl Rove. (none / 0) (#2)
    by Edger on Mon Aug 27, 2007 at 10:11:45 AM EST
    So... are him and Rove going into business working for Bush directly now, instead of for the president as government employees?

    Hey Chuck (none / 0) (#3)
    by Big Tent Democrat on Mon Aug 27, 2007 at 10:39:29 AM EST
    Is it back patting time? I beat him by 5 months. I called for impeachment.

    just sayin'

    But of course J is right. Who cares?

    apparently, (none / 0) (#7)
    by cpinva on Mon Aug 27, 2007 at 01:18:14 PM EST
    the italics weren't sufficiently obvious for some of you.

    let me repeat that again, for those of you bound to obliviousnesses: we expect them to at least appear to be legal whiz kids.

    that most aren't is a given. it is, after all, a political appointment. that said, most of the names on the list managed to at least seem like they knew what they were talking about in public, an accomplishment mr. gonzales never quite managed.

    why would you pat yourself on the back, the guy should have been gone a year ago. impeachment was always unrealistic, and still is. not to mention, it's a far more drawn out process than just having him resign, or suffer some terrible "accident". :)

    I'd say many of them (none / 0) (#8)
    by Deconstructionist on Mon Aug 27, 2007 at 01:23:53 PM EST
    never even remotely were tainted with the perception of being "whizzes."

    William Rogers  
    Robert F. Kennedy
    Nicholas  Katzenbach
    Ramsey Clark
    John Mitchell
    Richard G. Kleindienst
    Elliot L. Richardson
    William B. Saxbe
    Edward H. Levi
    Griffin Bell
    Benjamin R. Civiletti
    William French Smith
    Edwin Meese
    Richard L. Thornburgh
    William Barr
    Janet Reno
    John Ashcroft
    Alberto Gonzales