Closing Arguments in Jose Padilla Trial
The Government gave its closing argument today in the terrorism trial of Jose Padilla. The AP reports intent is key.
Was Padilla the "star recruit" of a terrorism support cell run by Adham Amin Hassoun and Kifah Wael Jayyousi whose ultimate goal was violent establishment of fundamentalist Islamic regimes around the world, as prosecutors claim?
Or did Hassoun and Jayyousi intend to provide relief and charity for innocent Muslims suffering in global conflict zones? And was Padilla simply an American who had recently converted to Islam and traveled overseas not for terrorism but to learn Arabic and the Quran?
The lawyer for one of the three defendants, Adham Amin Hassoun, also gave his closing today:
But Hassoun attorney Kenneth Swartz said in the first of three defense closing statements that "this case is all about speculation. It is not about proof of a crime. There is no intent to murder. The only intent is to provide relief."
Lawyers for Kifah Wael Jayyousi and Jose Padilla will close tomorrow. More on today's defense closing is here.
The Christian Science Monitor takes a long look at the case in tomorrow's paper. It says
Despite warnings, officials used 43 months of severe isolation to force Jose Padilla to tell all he knew about Al Qaeda.
|< Swift Boat Support For Rudy | Tracking Alberto Gonzales >|