home

Gonzales Impeachment Inquiry Resolution to Be Introduced

Via Oreo at Daily Kos, Rep. Jay Inslee (D-WA) will introduce a resolution before the House Judiciary Committee tomorrow asking that an inquiry be initiated to determine whether there are grounds to impeach Alberto Gonzales.

RESOLUTION

Directing the Committee on the Judiciary to investigate whether Alberto R. Gonzales, Attorney General of the United States, should be impeached for high crimes and misdemeanors.

Resolved, That the Committee on the Judiciary shall investigate fully whether sufficient grounds exist for the House of Representatives to impeach Alberto R. Gonzales, Attorney General of the United States, for high crimes and misdemeanors.

Contrary to Big Tent Democrat who favors Gonzales' impeachment, I don't have a position on it. Generally, I'm inclined against impeachment proceedings as an unnecessary usurption of Congressional time and money that could be better spent elsewhere.

Gonzales is a bigger detriment to the Republicans in 2008 if he remains as Attorney General. He will tarnish Bush's legacy permanently and Republican candidates will face a backlash because of him. If he goes early, voters may get over it by then.

More....

As I wrote here, I disagree that the day to day operation of the federal criminal justice system has changed since the Gonzales imbroglio. Work goes on in the federal courts, people get sent to jail daily, new cases are being brought, existing cases are being argued and Justice Department guidelines are being followed. In other words, the war on drugs, war on civil liberties and trend towards draconian sentences continues unabated.

I'd rather see the Judiciary Committees spend their time on criminal justice reform legislation like restoring habeas than an impeachment proceeding.

< Cheney Expresses Support for Gonzales and Libby | Jail Outrage of the Day >
  • The Online Magazine with Liberal coverage of crime-related political and injustice news

  • Contribute To TalkLeft


  • Display: Sort:
    all well and good - and your points are solid (5.00 / 1) (#1)
    by scribe on Mon Jul 30, 2007 at 04:35:58 PM EST
    but there are five more issues I see here, presented in no particular order:

    1.  In impeachment inquiries, there is little if any check on what the Congress is entitled to receive.  Executive privilege is at its nadir when Congress is investigating whether to impeach.

    2.  The public demands the Democrats do something besides pass bills the Republicans bottle up in the Senate, and veto once they go the distance along Pennsylvania Ave.

    3.  If impeachment is not coming for Gonzo's conduct, then when will it ever be applicable?  This is someone who, beyond lying, simply refused to answer legitimate questions put to him by both the House and the Senate.  The Congress' institutional survival is at stake.  As is the Constitution's.  Last week I watched that slug sitting there with the smirk of a mofo who knows he already has a pardon in the bag, putting up with the yelling coming from the SJC, knowing there's not a darn thing other than yell they could do to him.

    4.  All that "wasting time" and "term's almost up" talk assumes Bush and Cheney will leave office when their terms are up.  Given Giuliani's attempt in the aftermath of 9/11 to stay in office past the expiration of his term as Mayor, I am of the position that Bush and Cheney willingly leaving office when their terms expire is not something which can be taken for granted.  

    5.  Neither Bush nor Cheney will ever sign anything reducing criminal penalties or restoring habeas, so we should not waste time on that.  We should spend the time on getting rid of them and putting someone into office who will, and therefore make the time spent on those reforms time usefully spent.


    just askin' (5.00 / 1) (#3)
    by locomule on Mon Jul 30, 2007 at 05:39:22 PM EST
    I'd rather see the Judiciary Committees spend their time on criminal justice reform legislation like restoring habeas than an impeachment proceeding.
    Why is it all or nothing?  Can't they divide their time between working on needed legislation and removing the roadblocks to that legislation?

    I'm also left wondering if uncovering all of Bush&Co's evil wouldn't go a lot further to "tarnishing his legacy" than what we've already got.

    Gonzales is a major log in the jam - pry him out of there and I believe that a lot more information will begin to flow.

    you correctly note that (none / 0) (#4)
    by scribe on Mon Jul 30, 2007 at 05:58:53 PM EST
    Gonzales is a major log in the jam - pry him out of there and I believe that a lot more information will begin to flow

    This is why what I said about executive privilege (and any other privilege precluding disclosure to Congress, for that matter) being at its nadir is the first issue that leapt to mind when I commented.  

    If we want to open the logjam by breaking Torture Boy Gonzo out, the strongest pry bar in the toolbox is impeachment, because nothing can be withheld when the House is investigating impeachment.

    Parent

    nothing withheld and no pardons.... n/t (none / 0) (#5)
    by locomule on Mon Jul 30, 2007 at 06:08:16 PM EST
    YES: Impeach (none / 0) (#2)
    by MSS on Mon Jul 30, 2007 at 04:41:24 PM EST
    I hope that Democrats will impeach Gonzales.

    *He's low-hanging fruit, obviously lying and incompetent, and an embarrassment.

    *The American public sees Democrats as impotent to take action against these egregious members of the Bush administration. An impeachment investigation of Gonzales will highlight that Democrats can take some action.

    *Impeaching Gonzales will take some heat off pressure to impeach Bush/Cheney.

    *Impeaching Gonzales might stop some of the most egregious things he is still facilitating at the Justice Dept.

    I'd like to seem all these bastards impeached, as they deserve (whether or not they keep their trousers zipped). But will settle for Gonzales.


    Damage (none / 0) (#6)
    by joejoejoe on Mon Jul 30, 2007 at 08:00:54 PM EST
    "Gonzales is a bigger detriment to the Republicans in 2008 if he remains as Attorney General."

    He does damage to our nation and the rule of law every second he's allowed to abuse his position. Impeach the lying SOB.

    Rummy & Gates - Keep Gonzo (none / 0) (#7)
    by seabos84 on Mon Jul 30, 2007 at 08:19:36 PM EST
    I haven't a clue what exactly Gates is doing compared to Rummy, BUT

    I can guareentee that there are a variety of perspectives.

    However - he is probably just a few shades worse than rummy, MAYBE,

    except --- NO ONE is watching the guy the way rummy was watched.

    whoever replaces gonzo will be a fascist lackey.

    PERIOD

    let's keep him twisting in the wind till jan '09.

    rmm

    The importance of Gonzo ... (none / 0) (#8)
    by chemoelectric on Mon Jul 30, 2007 at 08:27:45 PM EST
    ... is that, if Gonzo were removed, he would no longer be able to shield Bush, and both Bush and Cheney might well be headed for the slammer, and not attacking Iran.