home

Why The You Tube Debate Was Poor

Unlike Jeralyn, who thought it was the best debate, I strongly disliked the CNN/ You Tube Debate mostly because it was a particularly silly exercise where attention seeking gimmicks like snowman, costumes and singing were the order of the day. Moreover, the actual questions were, a t best, badly phrased routine questions we have heard a million times. Can you believe there were no questions on the Supreme Court? But what really annoyed me was the conceit that CNN's slections represented some type of consensus view of "what the people wanted to talk about."

I am opposed to impeachment of the President for the many reasons I have explained here, but it would be silly of me to argue that there is not a strong contingent of Americans, particularly Democrats, who do want the President impeached. Susie Madrak points to a question that was soberly presented and did speak to an issue ignored by the Media that is very much on the minds of Democratic voters.

For the You Tube debate to have lived up to its billing, questions like that one should have been presented. CNN's conceit about this awful debate is badly misplaced.

< The Hillary-Obama Spat | Tour In Crisis: Leader Pulled Out Of Race >
  • The Online Magazine with Liberal coverage of crime-related political and injustice news

  • Contribute To TalkLeft


  • Display: Sort:
    Even more significant (none / 0) (#1)
    by Alien Abductee on Wed Jul 25, 2007 at 05:20:37 PM EST
    This debate question was voted No. 1 at CommunityCounts, the site where CNN gathered the questions, but for some reason, CNN wouldn't touch it:

    Thanks for pointing this out.

    And you know I oppose (5.00 / 2) (#2)
    by Big Tent Democrat on Wed Jul 25, 2007 at 05:24:05 PM EST
    impeachment but CNN can hardly say it was putting forth the voice of the people when this was not included.

    Parent
    And CNN found room for 2 (5.00 / 2) (#3)
    by Big Tent Democrat on Wed Jul 25, 2007 at 05:24:34 PM EST
    questions on gay marriage.

    Incredible.

    Parent

    Exactly (none / 0) (#4)
    by Alien Abductee on Wed Jul 25, 2007 at 05:27:53 PM EST
    What could they have been thinking? That no one would notice?

    Parent
    I liked it the best of all (none / 0) (#5)
    by Jeralyn on Wed Jul 25, 2007 at 05:32:57 PM EST
    the debates so far.  

    It was obvious ... (none / 0) (#6)
    by Sailor on Wed Jul 25, 2007 at 07:03:27 PM EST
    ... from the start that while it was proclaimed as a new tech town hall it was just another version of the MSM controlling the debate.

    p.s. The MSM is already on record as saying they just don't like John Edwards or Hilary Clinton. No reason, they just don't LIKE them.

    p.p.s. Look for the 5 corporations that control 90% of the media to trash any Dem and exalt any rethug that survives the winnowing. e.g. haircuts and dresses are public fare for Dems and not for rethugs.

    When you ask people to post questions, but you get (none / 0) (#7)
    by jerry on Wed Jul 25, 2007 at 10:11:20 PM EST
    to pick the questions, then it isn't true that the questions represent the people.

    The questions only represent you.

    I thought that it was okay (none / 0) (#8)
    by Militarytracy on Thu Jul 26, 2007 at 03:50:20 AM EST
    I have ISSUES though, you know this war stuff and me.  I liked the question from the soldier's father about the future of his younger sons and I liked that they included a question for a Darfur refugee (that one sort of caused me to gasp for a sec).  Some parts were silly and some were not, we do get access though to everything they overlooked or turned away from and that sort of  transparency where media, politics, the people, and issues all converge is delicious.  This is my first taste and it is yummy.  Sadly until we get beyond this war of choice other issues will be more easily ignored that would have never been.  I see that Murtha is trying to apply some Murtha pressure again soon with troop redeployment.