No Bond for Genarlow Wilson
A Georgia judge has denied bond for Genarlow Wilson, opining that the state statute does not allow for appeal bonds on the crime of which he was convicted.
His lawyer disagrees, saying Genarlow's case is a habeas case and the Judge looked at the wrong statute.
On June 11, as TChris wrote, Genarlow was ordered released from his 10 year sentence for having consensual oral sex with a girl who was only two years younger.
While serving his sentence, Genarlow filed a Habeas Petition, arguing the sentence violated the 8th Amendment ban against cruel and unusual punishment. It was granted. It is the state that is now seeking appellate review of the habeas decision. So which statute should apply, the habeas or the appeal bond?
More....
Without reading the statutes, I'd say the habeas statute applies. The last legal ruling in the case was one ordering him freed and reducing his crime to a misdemeanor. He's not appealing his felony conviction, the state is appealing the granting of his habeas. Even if the appeal bond statute applies, shouldn't it be one applicable to misdemeanors, since that's all he stands convicted of as of now? Again, Georgia lawyers, feel free to weigh in here.
| < Teen Experts: A Joint is Better Than Alcohol | How To Read Polls > |





