Don't we need a victim before we charge this guy with reckless endangerment or whatever and lock him up?

I'm not crazy about defending this clown since he was so irresponsible, but I would happily defend somebody else with this type of TB going off to live out his days in isolation in the woods or a desert island.  

Radio Netherlands Worldwide - Unprotected sex at any price?

Three seropositive gay men suspected of intentionally infecting people with HIV at sex parties in the Dutch town of Groningen will face charges of rape and grievous bodily harm with intent. They drugged at least five guests and injected them with their HIV-infected blood.

The men reportedly told police that it turned them on, and that the more HIV-infected people there were, the better their chances of unprotected sex. According to the Groningen Chief of Police they considered unprotected relations to be 'pure'. Two of those arrested, a couple aged 48 and 33 have confessed. A fourth man who allegedly supplied the three suspects with several litres of the date-rape drug GHB and Ecstasy tablets was also arrested.

Conditional Intent
Even though infection with HIV can be fatal if it develops into AIDS, the Public Prosecutors' Office will not be able to charge the suspects with attempted murder, or even manslaughter. In the past few years, the authorities have made several attempts to win convictions on these charges, for instance in the case of an HIV-positive man who failed to warn his sex partners about his condition. However, the Dutch Supreme Court has consistently ruled that there was insufficient evidence of either murder or manslaughter in these cases.[...]

[T]he Dutch HIV Association, a government sponsored and subsided volunteer organisation created to promote safe sex, is in crisis because an internal working group is claiming the right to unsafe sex for HIV-infected people. The group, which calls itself Poz' and Proud, reportedly also wants to organise unsafe sex parties.

Poz' and Proud says those who do not wish to become infected should take responsibility for their own actions. The group argues that the Dutch HIV Association has no right to pronounce moral judgment on those who transmit the HIV virus through unsafe sex.

While we have made advancements in some areas of medical science, others we are falling behind in. There are vaccinations for many diseases that only pose minimal risk such as flu, chicken pox, mumps, etc. Children are very susceptible to toxins in their bodies and vaccines contain many toxins that are linked to medical conditions on the rise such as learning and emotional behavior disabilities, autism, aspergers Syndrome, etc. I can certainly understand the argument that some vaccines are in the public interest, such as Polio. However, we have gone way beyond this and are vaccinating every disease, many of which only cause minor discomfort to the majority of individuals and we also don't understand how this may affect our overall immune system for children who are vaccinated against relatively minor diseases that most of us lived through just fine. If their immunde systems become compromised or not, we do not know.

We do know there are toxins in vaccines and many of these vaccines are produced by the pharmacuetical companies who see compulsory public vaccination as a means for attaining high profits.