home

Bad Officer's Career Finally Ends

A federal judge told William White that charges against him would probably mark a "dismal end" to his career in law enforcement. The question is why that career didn't end years ago.

White planted evidence on a suspect in a drug arrest. He was fired, as he should have been, but the police union helped him get his job back. Later in his career, White pointed his gun at a group of children as he berated them with racial epithets. He kept his job despite community outrage. Still later, he was sued for beating a 13-year-old. None of that was enough to end his career at the New Haven Police Department.

It took the FBI to uncover White's latest wrongdoing.

In what prosecutors said was the most damning evidence, Lieutenant White took $27,500 from a car that he believed was part of a drug bust in January, according to the affidavit. Over and over, he said that he did not want to hurt the informant or get caught on film. But in the end, he covered his face and took the money, writing the word “estúpido” on one of the bags that held the cash to make it seem that the car had been robbed (he first called several people to find out how to spell the word “stupid” in Spanish, the affidavit said).

< Judge Speaks Out Against Federal Death Penalty Prosecutions | March Madness 8 - Who Can Win It All? >
  • The Online Magazine with Liberal coverage of crime-related political and injustice news

  • Contribute To TalkLeft


  • Display: Sort:
    You already (none / 0) (#1)
    by Patrick on Thu Mar 15, 2007 at 11:39:04 AM EST
    answered your question.   Police Unions.  Not the department unions, but the state wide ones.  In California it's PORAC and CCPOA.  They own the state government and get legislation passed making it nearly impossible to fire tenured officers.  Teachers too.  Of course there are legitimate concerns that should be addressed by unions, but look what happened to ole Ahnold when the unions (PORAC, CCPOA and California Teachers) decided they didn't like his politics.  

    Patrick (none / 0) (#2)
    by sarcastic unnamed one on Thu Mar 15, 2007 at 11:48:58 AM EST
    You beat me to it.

    I was just sitting here trying to figure out what TChris's point of the story was - bad cop fired but rehired and put back on the streets because of his union - and the only thing I could come up with is that TChris is anti-union.

    Seems an odd position for him to take, but go figure.

    Sarc (none / 0) (#3)
    by Patrick on Thu Mar 15, 2007 at 12:00:52 PM EST
    I'm not even anti-union, but like the gov't, power corrupts.  PORAC isn't the least bit interested in my working conditions, but watch what happens if I don't pay my dues.

    Parent
    I hear you, I don't really think TChris is (none / 0) (#7)
    by sarcastic unnamed one on Thu Mar 15, 2007 at 01:19:24 PM EST
    anti-union, just that he picked a weird story this time to support his agenda.

    Not suprising that, as a lawyer, he never mentions the crooked lawyer stories.

    The Securities and Exchange Commission announced today that on February 27, 2007, the Connecticut federal district court entered a final judgment by consent in a fraud action filed by the Commission against Charles B. Spadoni, the former vice president and general counsel of Triumph Capital Group, Inc. ("Triumph"), an investment firm headquartered in Boston, Massachusetts.


    Parent
    Or the Defense Attorney (none / 0) (#9)
    by Patrick on Thu Mar 15, 2007 at 04:42:49 PM EST
    who was caught naked with a minor in the courthouse.

    Or Spielbauer.  

    Or quite a few others.  

    Perhaps the point is there are good and bad in every profession, T-Chris just has the proverbial woody for cops.   Perhaps he's a frustrated wannabe...

    Parent

    Yup (none / 0) (#10)
    by sarcastic unnamed one on Thu Mar 15, 2007 at 04:53:17 PM EST
     

    Parent
    Or.... (none / 0) (#11)
    by mack on Thu Mar 15, 2007 at 05:23:31 PM EST
    Perhaps the point is there are good and bad in every profession, T-Chris just has the proverbial woody for cops.   Perhaps he's a frustrated wannabe...

    Or perhaps it's because police have the unique job of enforcing the law (hence the term "law enforcement") and are thus held to a higher standard and subject to closer scrutiny.


    Parent

    Well, (none / 0) (#12)
    by Patrick on Fri Mar 16, 2007 at 09:55:53 AM EST
    I suppose if you call T-Chris' coverage of police misconduct, (Ie perpetuating lies and misinformation) holding them to a higher standard then you might have a point.  Otherwise, T-Chris has shown a marked bias against LE.  I'm not opposed to holding them to a higher standard, in fact I do, but I also realize that in many of the cases there are reasonable explanations for their conduct, there are legitimate mistakes, and there is deliberate misconduct.  T-Chris doesn't seem to be able to make those distinctions.  You only need to look through his posts on the topic for proof.

    Parent
    Well (none / 0) (#13)
    by squeaky on Fri Mar 16, 2007 at 11:02:50 AM EST
    It is a dirty job, and someone has to do it. Hey, some people spend their life arresting innocent people.

    Parent
    Well, (none / 0) (#14)
    by Patrick on Fri Mar 16, 2007 at 01:22:34 PM EST
    Being a liar is definitely a dirty job.  

    Parent
    Here's how I see it.. (none / 0) (#4)
    by Patrick on Thu Mar 15, 2007 at 12:07:12 PM EST
    White planted evidence on a suspect in a drug arrest.

    Since he was fired, I can assume there was some evidence to back this up.  He should be in jail for that.

    White pointed his gun at a group of children as he berated them with racial epithets.

    Hmm, could be a lot of things with this one.  No mention of punishement, this group of children could have 8-trey gangsters for all we know.  Not enough 411

    Still later, he was sued for beating a 13-year-old.

    A lawsuit is evidence of absolutely nothing.  I've been sued by some crackpots for some made-up sh!it before.  

    This latest case:  He should again go to jail, but I must add that if he were jailed on the first one, and KEPT there, he would not have been in a position to commit the second one.  Proof that jail works!

    What standard? (none / 0) (#6)
    by Abdul Abulbul Amir on Thu Mar 15, 2007 at 12:59:51 PM EST
    White planted evidence on a suspect in a drug arrest.

    Since he was fired, I can assume there was some evidence to back this up.  He should be in jail for that.

    Do you think that the standard for firing a police officer should be a felony conviction, or perhaps proof of a felony beyond reasonable doubt?

    Parent

    I think (none / 0) (#8)
    by Patrick on Thu Mar 15, 2007 at 04:37:57 PM EST
    you missed the point of my post.  Not only should he have been fired, he should have been put in jail as well.  

    I think the standard for termination is misconduct that rises to the level set by the department, any founded integrity complaint, loss of qualification, etc.   There's plaenty of reasons to terminate a cop that don't even rise to the level of criminal let alone felonies.  

    Parent

    ¿Estúpido? (none / 0) (#5)
    by Dom on Thu Mar 15, 2007 at 12:53:44 PM EST
    According to the New Haven Register, the FBI arrested two New Haven police officers and three bail bondsmen. The Associated Press reports that the entire New Haven Narcotic Enforcement Unit will be shut down.

    I fail altogether to grasp the significance of writing "estupido" on the bag in orthographically correct Spanish. Have there been other thefts in the area where "estupido" was written on property left behind?

    Here is slightly more context from the FBI affidavit:

    Later, White continued to talk about stealing the money that had been left behind. White talked about how they could make the theft look like a break-in [...]. He also continued to express his belief that the [supposed] "informant" would get killed if the money was stolen.

    White next considered whether they could steal the money, and leave a sign that said "sucker" on it, to make it look like a robbery. They then discussed writing "estupido" ("stupid" in Spanish) on the note. White made several phone calls to figure out how to spell "estupido."

    While White continued to scheme about how to steal the money, he again expressed his belief that the [supposed informant] would be killed. [...] At one point he decided: "[Expletive] it, let's go. Estupido on everybody probably." Nonetheless, before taking action, he again expressed concerns: "I don't like her [i.e. the involvement of the supposed informant], man. That's the only [expletive] thing I don't like. If she wasn't in this thing, sppppp, forget it."