Lieberman's Iraq Argument: Eviscerate the Separation of Powers
Posted on Sat Feb 17, 2007 at 12:33:00 PM EST
Tags: (all tags)
Josh Marshall points to a Joe Lieberman statement where Lieberman essentially argues for evisceration of the separation of powers when it comes to the war power.
Lieberman starts with some correct analysis:
Congress has been given constitutional responsibilities. But the micro-management of war is not one of them. The appropriation of funds for war is. I appreciate that each of us here has our own ideas about the best way forward in Iraq, I respect those that take a different position than I, and I understand that many feel strongly that the President’s strategy is the wrong one. But the Constitution, which has served us now for more than two great centuries of our history, creates not 535 commanders-in-chief, but one—the President of the United States, who is authorized to lead the day to day conduct of war.
As I have written before, this is my view:
What is clear is that all this legal tapdancing get us nowhere. To end the war, the Congress can do one of two things, or preferably both: it can repeal the Iraq AUMF, and/or it can refuse to fund the war. This sophistry from Democrats, politicians and legal scholars, does neither us nor our principles credit.
Why does Lieberman argue for eviscerating the separation of powers? Because he urges Congress NOT to exercise its judgment in exercising the Spending Power. He urges the Congress just do what the President says:
Whatever our opinion of this war or its conduct, it is in no one’s interest to stumble into a debilitating confrontation between our two great branches of government over war powers. The potential for a constitutional crisis here and now is real, with congressional interventions, presidential vetoes, and Supreme Court decisions. If there was ever a moment for nonpartisan cooperation to agree on a process that will respect both our personal opinions about this war and our nation’s interests over the long term, this is it.
Lieberman gives this speech to the Congress. What does he say to the President? He cheers him. He supports the surge. He agrees one hundred percent with him.
This is Lieberman at his most disingenuous and dishonest. At least say it straight out Joe - you want to lick Bush's boots, then do it right.
The Congress needs to exercise its responsibility and defund the War. IF a Constitutional Crisis results, it will be because your hero George Bush does not respect the Constitution. And let's be honest, neither do you.
| < Fitz's Objections to Libby's Theory of Defense Instruction | Gary Hart: Bring the National Guard Home From Iraq > |
