My favorite is this crap about Paul Krugman being the scared leader of the left who know one can criticize.

All this Obama hate from the Clinton bloggers is a sad and pathetic attempt to even up Obama and Clinton's negatives.  Many of them are personal attacks.  Think of Jane's Obama is a opportunist crap.  These supposed liberals are attempting to do to Obama what the right wing machine did to Hillary in the 90's.  Look for all this crap to parroted in the genral if he wins.

If these had really been thoroughly discussed before, Obama would be gone from the race after Iowa.  You still will not find much, if any, of this in Big Media.  There's quite a selling job being done for Obama, for now.

If he gets the nomination though, all the gloves will come off and he's gonna be hit in the face with a 2x4 every day by the republicans and Big Media.  It's happened before in '00 and '04 and will happen again.

Most of the facts in the complete research are well known, true and reflect the fact that Obama is not only a Triangulator, but also to the right of HRC, ie. the center, and is a very dangerous for a Democrats to vote for.

The degree of emptiness in Obama's campaign is not reflected by Left Coaster. The first several months of the campaign had no content. The idea seems to have been: Obama is the best thing since sliced bread, everyone must realize that. Later plans were copied mainly from Edwards. Finally, Obama morphed into an ugly and mean Republican.

Much has been made of Obama's affinity for "third way" politics in the style of Joe Lieberman or Jim Wallis. There is some of that here, but we shouldn't mistake Obama for a simple triangulator like Bill Clinton. Nor is he necessarily in pursuit of an illusory moral center like Wallis. Unlike the mushmouthed practitioner of "God's Politics," Obama isn't so certain that all the differences can be worked out if we just try hard enough to get right with God and agree with one another. He's after something more here, something infinitely more threatening to politics as they are currently practiced: he wants to reclaim the authentic self in the public realm.

I know what I look like, he says to his readers: just another b.s. artist with some snake oil to sell. But it's not me; it's the fallen nature of our discourse. We can't take someone like Obama at his word, he argues, because the structure of our political life has been set up to prevent us from trusting one another. In turn, that lack of trust prevents us from being who we were meant to be, both as individuals and as a society. And so here's the audacity: Obama believes that the current political logjam can be broken by repairing the discourse that created it.

That, I may need to spell out, is a very Christian line of thought. Obama is going to drive progressives up a wall because they'll be looking for him to take their side in the partisan dogfights, and he's practicing a ministry of reconciliation. Which doesn't mean that he doesn't agree with them on the issues: it just means that he defines leadership in a very different way. Unlike many in the netroots, Obama doesn't believe that liberals need to do the same thing, only better - ie, outwork the Republicans. He thinks that it's time for fundamentally new tactics and a fundamentally new strategy.

The initial assumption is dead wrong. Bill the triangulator is a four letter word used by the MSM and enemies of Bill. It misses the main issue that both GW Bush and Obama are working hard to hide. In the words of the great white hope, Reagan, were we better off after Bill's two terms or were in the dumps?

Obama is a semi-Republican in substance. He is for vouchers, wants to talk with the fascists and worried about social security instead of health care into which he was dragged kicking and screaming. Initially, I mistakenly believed in Obama and gave money to his campaign.