home

Stupid Citation Dismissed

In this post, TalkLeft called attention to a silly citation issued to a Scranton woman who used salty language inside her own home after her toilet overflowed. A neighbor (an off-duty cop) heard the cursing through an open window and called in a complaint. The woman was cited for disorderly conduct.

Demonstrating much more sense than the officer who issued the citation, District Judge Terrence Gallagher dismissed the charge.

Although the language she used "may be considered by some to be offensive, vulgar and imprudent ... such representations are protected speech pursuant to the First Amendment," the judge wrote Thursday.

Today's moral: if you hear language you don't like coming from someone's home, stop listening and mind your own business. Don't waste the community's resources by calling the police.

< Distributing Drugs to Create Snitches: Not a Problem in TX | Rudy Now Toast: Drops To Third In Florida >
  • The Online Magazine with Liberal coverage of crime-related political and injustice news

  • Contribute To TalkLeft


  • Display: Sort:
    I think... (none / 0) (#1)
    by desertswine on Fri Dec 14, 2007 at 02:36:50 PM EST
    that an overflowing toilet actually requires salty language.

    Any chance... (none / 0) (#2)
    by MileHi Hawkeye on Fri Dec 14, 2007 at 03:18:34 PM EST
    ...that she could file a counter suit?  This woman was inside the confines of her own property and was cited?  There's got to be an episode of "The Office" in there somewhere...

    You'd think that a cop would have heard enough salty language that such things wouldn't bother him anymore.  I guess that is pre 9-11 thinking.

    And, good for the judge!

    Amen brother..... (none / 0) (#3)
    by kdog on Fri Dec 14, 2007 at 03:25:39 PM EST
    We really need the "mind your own business" mantra to make a major comeback, in more ways than one.  

    Perfect set up for a 42 U.S.C. section 1983 (none / 0) (#4)
    by oculus on Fri Dec 14, 2007 at 04:13:59 PM EST
    civil lawsuit alleging the neighbor violated lady's First Amendment rights. She should be quite grateful to the judge.

    had the neighbor not been (none / 0) (#5)
    by cpinva on Fri Dec 14, 2007 at 06:51:40 PM EST
    an off-duty policeman, convince me that the police would have even responded in the first place. that there is a string of case law on this issue, going back years and years, should have caused the citation to be squashed by the supervisor in charge, before it ever made it to court.

    both the complaining off-duty cop, and citing officer should have been disciplined, for a clear civil rights violation. i'm betting nothing happened to them.