home

Stuffing Your Shorts: Every Man Wants To be A Macho Macho Man

You wonder sometimes how stupid our DC Democrats can be. Just when you think they can't do something more idiotic, they top themselves. Nancy Pelosi makes history this week, heck the press coverage was grudgingly good. So what do we get? This dimwittery:

Thursday was notable for another milestone in gender politics: the return of the Alpha Male Democrat. The members of this new faction, which helped the Democrats expand into majority status, stand out not for their ideology or racial background but for their carefully cultivated masculinity. . . . John Lapp, the former executive director of the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee who helped recruit this new breed of candidate[, says] “These are red-blooded Americans who are tough.” Mr. Lapp even coined a term to describe these manly — and they are all men — pols: “the Macho Dems.”

Sheesh. The Macho Dems? Only a wimp has to call himself macho. This is the rhetorical equivalent of stuffing the crotch in your pants. Mr. Lapp, let me clue you in to something - Jim Webb and Jon Tester and Joe Sestak and Patrick Murphy do not need YOU calling them "Macho Dems" and "red blooded Americans." Authenticity. Look it up. Figure it out. This is pathetic, not to mention insulting to the rest of the Party and to the strong Fighting Dem women in our Party. Only a wimpy, spineless DC Democrat could come up with this.

Compounding this stupidity, is the nonsense from the journalist who writes the article, Ryan Lizza:

Sure, some Macho Dems express support for, say, abortion rights but one gets the sense that ensuring Roe’s preservation may not be one of their highest priorities in coming to the Senate. It’s hard to imagine them at the next Emily’s List fund-raiser. Ideologically, many Macho Dems are culturally conservative and economically liberal — making them odd ducks in a party that since the Clinton years has been defined by cultural liberalism and Rubinomics.

So what the heck does "culturally conservative" mean anyway? Apparently, according to Lizza, you can be "culturally conservative" even if you support privacy rights, oppose the Iraq war, support stem cell research, believe in separation of church and state, etc.? Cool. Lizza would say sure, but is that their top priority? Hey Lizza, do you think Shuler, Casey and Ellsworth have abortion as THEIR top priority? Of course not.

This is all ridiculous. But the Media is nothing if not ridiculous. And the DC Dems appparently will never learn.

< Meet Guantanamo Detainee 940 - Adel Hamad | Blood For Oil? >
  • The Online Magazine with Liberal coverage of crime-related political and injustice news

  • Contribute To TalkLeft


  • Display: Sort:
    The way I read this (5.00 / 1) (#10)
    by Kitt on Sun Jan 07, 2007 at 03:28:24 PM EST
    is in terms of 'traditional' machosimo, which if one knows ANYTHING about the men mentioned, they would know the stature held by their partners and wives. These men are who they are in part because of who surrounds them.

    'Culturally conservative' and economically liberal - better look again. Nah-uh.


    When (5.00 / 1) (#15)
    by aahpat on Mon Jan 08, 2007 at 03:59:30 PM EST
    will politicians learn that they do not get to define themselves but with their actions. Not their words.

    They can talk the trash but they act like dorks. Wimps. Very insecure children. That is the case with the entirety of both of the two dominance parties.

    Congressional Progressive Caucus (5.00 / 1) (#16)
    by aahpat on Mon Jan 08, 2007 at 04:03:45 PM EST
    "Congressional Progressive Caucus"

    Now there is a group I wish would be more assertive, aggressive and yes MACHO! Someone needs to really start fighting for progressive values.

    I'm wondering how much (none / 0) (#1)
    by aw on Sun Jan 07, 2007 at 11:28:41 AM EST
    credit the DCCC even deserves for "recruiting" these  guys.

    John Lapp (none / 0) (#2)
    by Edger on Sun Jan 07, 2007 at 11:33:14 AM EST
    has a teeny little problem, I think.

    Macho Democrats (none / 0) (#3)
    by David Rhodes on Sun Jan 07, 2007 at 12:43:50 PM EST
    I suspect we are going to have a lot of problems with some of these new Democrats. It took a pretty conservative bunch to kick out many of the Republican incumbents. The good news is that there has been at least some shift away from the Right. The bad news is that now we have a lot of new Joe Liebermans in Congress. We can only work toward the day that the Joe Liebermans are considered to be right wing extremists and the new center is somewhere between the liberal and moderate wing of the Democratic party. Wishful thinking, I know, but one can dream.

    No we won't (5.00 / 1) (#4)
    by Big Tent Democrat on Sun Jan 07, 2007 at 12:45:43 PM EST
    That is a myth.

    Sorry, you need to get more information. What you state is simply not true.

    Parent

    One can dream (none / 0) (#7)
    by scarshapedstar on Sun Jan 07, 2007 at 12:58:14 PM EST
    Of a future free of rightwing kool-aid talking points like these.

    Parent
    David writes: (none / 0) (#9)
    by jimakaPPJ on Sun Jan 07, 2007 at 01:40:48 PM EST
    The bad news is that now we have a lot of new Joe Liebermans in Congress.

    Success is getting what you want.

    Happiness is wanting what you get.

    Parent

    I wish (none / 0) (#5)
    by Che's Lounge on Sun Jan 07, 2007 at 12:46:06 PM EST
    They. All. Could be.

    California girls.

    Maybe they will be, Che (none / 0) (#6)
    by Edger on Sun Jan 07, 2007 at 12:54:27 PM EST
    Progressive women outnumber 'blue dog' Dems
    Denise Baer, president of Strategic Research Concepts, a political consulting firm in Bethesda, Md., said that the Blue Dog Coalition's numbers don't compare to the strength of the progressive or women's caucuses.

    "We heard a lot about the Blue Dog Democrats being the largest caucus in the House of Representatives," Baer said at a post-election news conference. "The Congressional Caucus for Women's Issues is really going to be the largest caucus . . . So women are going to be leaders."
    ...
    Two women-California Democrats Barbara Lee and Lynn Woolsey-currently chair the Congressional Progressive Caucus, and both are seeking re-election to lead the caucus in the 110th Congress. If they win, they will hold sway over the largest ideological voting blocs in the House of Representatives.



    I'll take (none / 0) (#8)
    by Che's Lounge on Sun Jan 07, 2007 at 01:05:09 PM EST
    Maxie Waters over Condi Rice any day. Not because of the color of their skin, but because of the content of their character.

    ok BTD, let's deconstruct this, shall we? (none / 0) (#12)
    by cpinva on Sun Jan 07, 2007 at 07:29:43 PM EST
    "John Lapp, the former executive director of the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee"

    important point: he's the "former" executive director. this would tend to indicate he didn't do a good job. who gives two nanny goat shi*ts what he thinks or says?

    "but one gets the sense that ensuring Roe's preservation may not be one of their highest priorities in coming to the Senate."

    important point: how does mr. Lizza know this? beats me, and you, and everyone else, because mr. Lizza conveniently neglects to tell us. he's just blowing smoke out of his ass.

    "Ideologically, many Macho Dems are culturally conservative and economically liberal"

    important point: again, how does mr. Lizza know this? again, beats me, and everyone else, because, again, mr. Lizza conveniently neglects to provide any supporting evidence for this claim. more "smoke out of ass blowing".

    of course, it's this kind of nonsensicle drivel that helped put bush in the white house to begin with. the difference being that in 2000 & 2004, it was done by people you've actually heard of, as opposed to a nobody like mr. Lizza.

    the dems have to hit back, and hit back hard, daily, hourly if necessary, to fight this kind idiocy.


    Founding member? (none / 0) (#14)
    by peacrevol on Mon Jan 08, 2007 at 09:15:50 AM EST
    Does the republican party have a macho group? Was it founded by Janet Reno?

    sorry, couldnt resist the joke...

    Speaking of macho (none / 0) (#17)
    by aw on Mon Jan 08, 2007 at 09:39:43 PM EST