home

Latino Discrimination in Mamaroneck

Mamaroneck is a suburb of New York City, near Larchmont and New Rochelle, in affluent Westchester County. Last week, in a 72 page opinion, a federal judge ruled the village discriminated against Latino day laborers.

The ruling cited evidence that following the Mamaroneck Village Board’s resolution earlier this year to close a day labor hiring site in Columbus Park, police applied a “virtual zero tolerance policy” to contractors seeking to hire Latino day laborers near the park but issued no tickets to parents dropping off children at the nearby day care center and schools, even if they blocked traffic. Police were observed ticketing Latino drivers for not wearing seatbelts, but merely gesturing at white drivers to buckle up.

The New York Times has a terrific editorial today on the case.

You cannot abuse people through selective enforcement of the law. You cannot single people out for special punishment without cause. You cannot instruct the police to harass people for being Latino and poor. Cities and towns across the country have overlooked these basics in their eagerness to punish those they presume to have violated federal immigration laws. But thankfully for all of us, the Constitution still has the final say.

The full text of the ruling is here (pdf).

< Thanksgiving: A Different View | Calif. Judge Blocks Raids on Homeless Camps >
  • The Online Magazine with Liberal coverage of crime-related political and injustice news

  • Contribute To TalkLeft


  • Display: Sort:
    Still confused (1.00 / 1) (#2)
    by jarober on Fri Nov 24, 2006 at 10:17:33 AM EST
    TL still can't quite grasp the "illegal" part of "illegal alien".

    Interesting (5.00 / 1) (#3)
    by Jen M on Fri Nov 24, 2006 at 10:38:26 AM EST
    assumptions being made here.

    Parent
    brings back childhood memories (none / 0) (#1)
    by teacherken on Fri Nov 24, 2006 at 05:23:03 AM EST
    But some clarification is necessary.  The Town of Mamaroneck has 3 parts, an unincorporated part which has a Larchmont address (where I grew up) and two incorporated villages, Mamaroneck and Larchmont.  Thus it would be correct to say the Village of Mamaroneck was near Larchmont.  By the way, Mamaroneck Village is also next to Rye and Harrison.

    The fathers of the Village of Mamaroneck have at times been a bit anal retentive.  I note that the Village includes the section known as Orient Point, which had one of the first gated communities I could ever remember encountering.

    As I said, brought back some memories from this alum of Mamaroneck HS, class of 1963

    Larchmont Woods (none / 0) (#4)
    by Jeralyn on Fri Nov 24, 2006 at 05:25:06 PM EST
    I grew up in a section of New Rochelle referred to as Larchmont Woods. It was a great place to grow up.

    Parent
    so we were neighbors (none / 0) (#6)
    by teacherken on Mon Nov 27, 2006 at 07:26:02 PM EST
    My address was 1 Huguenot Drive.  Right up the hill was Barnard Road, which if we turned left very quickly took us into New Rochelle.  If I went down our back street, which was Lafayette Rd, if we had been able to keep going in about half a mile we would have been in City Park in New Rochelle.

    Parent
    running to my lawyer ..... (none / 0) (#5)
    by RONMAMARONECK on Mon Nov 27, 2006 at 01:53:54 PM EST
    Soon, I will be filing MY lawsuit against the Village of Mamaroneck , since it seems like my wife has been the only one to have received numerous tickets for "illegally" parking in front of the school on Mamaroneck Ave.   I am the first to stand up for individual rights however those rights must be in balance with the good of the community.  The daily cost of have 30 - 50 day laborers standing in a public park and spilling out onto the public street to service private contractors should not be paid by the residents of Mamaroneck.  I had witnessed day laborers using the lake in the park as a bathroom and the playground as a trashcan.  Why should the taxpayers in Mamaroneck bear all the costs (crowd and vehicular control, sanitation detail, and reduced open space for the residents) while private contractors and non-Mamaroneck residents gain all of the benefits?  This country was founded on the principle of "No Taxation without Representation" however that principle seems to have changed in modern times to "Representation without Taxation."   The one thing I have not figured out is how to tell the IRS I want to fall into the latter principle -- Will "illegal citizen" work? (seems like being classified as "illegal" allows you to play by different rules and laws).