home

Taking the Torture Question to the Street

Amnesty International took their video camera to the street and asked Americans about torture, indefinite detention, impunity for war crimes and enemy combatants. Their responses were illuminating -- check them out here:

< Will Tapes Help Gibbons? | GOP Blames The Troops For Iraq Failures >
  • The Online Magazine with Liberal coverage of crime-related political and injustice news

  • Contribute To TalkLeft


  • Display: Sort:
    I guess the old adage is true (none / 0) (#1)
    by Nowonami on Wed Nov 01, 2006 at 07:45:03 PM EST
    "Ignorance is Bliss"

    That video is frightenting. It's frightening how many people just don't care to know about the current Administration is doing, or planning to do. But they would be the first ones to holler and yell if it was happening to them... but the Catch 22 is if it does happen to them, they won't be heard.

    I think you meant (none / 0) (#2)
    by Che's Lounge on Wed Nov 01, 2006 at 09:35:02 PM EST
    Immunity, not impunity for war crimes.

    Excellent Video (none / 0) (#3)
    by theologicus on Thu Nov 02, 2006 at 07:42:46 AM EST
    Thanks for posting this.  It strikes exactly the right chord.  This is what Americans need to know while something can still be done.

    Franks Morales, an Episcopal priest and activist in NYC, calls our attention to yet another piece of draconian legislation.

    Bush Moves Toward Martial Law

    Frank Morales

    In a stealth maneuver, President Bush has signed into law a provision which, according to Senator Patrick Leahy (D-Vermont), will actually encourage the President to declare federal martial law (1). It does so by revising the Insurrection Act, a set of laws that limits the President's ability to deploy troops within the United States.

    The Insurrection Act (10 U.S.C.331 -335) has historically, along with the Posse Comitatus Act (18 U.S.C.1385), helped to enforce strict prohibitions on military involvement in domestic law enforcement. With one cloaked swipe of his pen, Bush is seeking to undo those prohibitions.

    Public Law 109-364, or the "John Warner Defense Authorization Act of 2007? (H.R.5122) (2), which was signed by the commander in chief on October 17th, 2006, in a private Oval Office ceremony, allows the President to declare a "public emergency" and station troops anywhere in America and take control of state-based National Guard units without the consent of the governor or local authorities, in order to "suppress public disorder."

    President Bush seized this unprecedented power on the very same day that he signed the equally odious Military Commissions Act of 2006.

    In a sense, the two laws complement one another. One allows for torture and detention abroad, while the other seeks to enforce acquiescence at home, preparing to order the military onto the streets of America. Remember, the term for putting an area under military law enforcement control is precise; the term is "martial law."

    Section 1076 of the massive Authorization Act, which grants the Pentagon another $500-plus-billion for its ill-advised adventures, is entitled, "Use of the Armed Forces in Major Public Emergencies."

    Section 333, "Major public emergencies; interference with State and Federal law" states that "the President may employ the armed forces, including the National Guard in Federal service, to restore public order and enforce the laws of the United States when, as a result of a natural disaster, epidemic, or other serious public health emergency, terrorist attack or incident, or other condition in any State or possession of the United States, the President determines that domestic violence has occurred to such an extent that the constituted authorities of the State or possession are incapable of ("refuse" or "fail" in) maintaining public order, "in order to suppress, in any State, any insurrection, domestic violence, unlawful combination, or conspiracy."

    www.rinf.com/columnists/news/bush-moves-toward-martial-law