home

The Buck Stops Where?

Why did GOP candidate Tan Nguyen, running for Congress in Orange County, California against Rep. Loretta Sanchez, pony up money for a list of Democratic voters? One possibility: to discourage foreign-born Democrats from voting by advising them in a letter that it's illegal for immigrants to vote. That bit of advice is a lie, of course -- immigrants who are citizens have the same voting rights as Americans who are citizens by birth -- but Nguyen refuses to take responsibility for the letter. He blames his office manager while disavowing any knowledge of the use to which the mailing list was put.

Finger pointing and playing the blame game is a Republican way of life, but in this instance, not a very effective one.

In an interview today, Orange County GOP Chairman Scott Baugh said representatives of the Huntington Beach mail house that produced the letter told him that Nguyen was directly involved with the letter, calling and asking that it be sent out as soon as possible.

< The Anti-Gay Revival Tent | The Kiss >
  • The Online Magazine with Liberal coverage of crime-related political and injustice news

  • Contribute To TalkLeft


  • Display: Sort:
    Re: The Buck Stops Where? (1.00 / 0) (#19)
    by jimakaPPJ on Fri Oct 20, 2006 at 09:41:07 AM EST
    TChris writes:

    No language requirement is imposed on a citizen who is born in the US. Some US-born citizens grow up speaking Spanish.  Ballots are printed in Spanish to facilitate their right to vote.  This isn't a bad thing.

    I did not say that there is a requirement for citizens born in the USA to speak English.

    But if it is a  requirement to speak English to become a citizen, then that is needed to perform the duties and rights of a citizen.

    If they have not prepared themselves to perform their duties, they should not have the "rights."

    TChris, what you seem to be saying is that it is acceptable to have ghettos where the customs and laws that exist are based on the customs and laws that exist in the native lands of the inhabitants of the ghettos. Some of which are actually second generation "citizens."

    This a formula for disaster. See France and other members of the EU with their Moslem ghettos and you will have a very accurate view of what we face in the not to distant future.

    Plainer. You focus on rights but not responsibility.

    Re: The Buck Stops Where? (none / 0) (#21)
    by Repack Rider on Fri Oct 20, 2006 at 09:56:38 AM EST
    what you seem to be saying is that it is acceptable to have ghettos where the customs and laws that exist are based on the customs and laws that exist in the native lands of the inhabitants of the ghettos. Some of which are actually second generation "citizens."

    Yes, as long as they don't violate the law, those would be rights guaranteed by the First Amendment.  Why do you hate the Constitution?

    A second generation "citizen" is as much of a "citizen" as anyone else, despite the quotation marks that suggest otherwise, and is entitled to use any language he can communicate successfully in.  You would have a hard time understanding some of my 9th or 10th generation, American-born Black employees when they talk among themselves, although they can switch to your version of English when they choose to.  (I understand them, but I can't duplicate their vernacular.)

    Parent

    Ghettos (none / 0) (#31)
    by John Mann on Sat Oct 21, 2006 at 08:10:22 AM EST
    This a formula for disaster. See France and other members of the EU with their Moslem ghettos and you will have a very accurate view of what we face in the not to distant future.

    You already have all kinds of ghettos in the "Christian" U.S. where people speak English.

    So what's your point?

    Parent

    Re: The Buck Stops Where? (1.00 / 0) (#32)
    by jimakaPPJ on Sat Oct 21, 2006 at 10:16:26 AM EST
    Repack - The Governor is an naturalized citizen. Read the definition.

    Roy - The fact is that an immigrant is not a citizen. Read the definition.

    DA - Since my crystal ball is currently under repair I have no way of knowing if the letter was meant to deceive.

    Neither do you.

    Sailor - You are wrong as usual. I am happy to point put what the words were, and what the words mean. Something that you, I believe, a person born in the US seem to have difficulty with.

    Sailor - The fact that a large portion of our population may not understand your examples is testimony to the failure of our education system.

    Fixing that problem would also fix the problem you refer.

    But you appear to  merely want to let people who don't speak english and who are not citizens, vote.

    Re: The Buck Stops Where? (none / 0) (#35)
    by roy on Sat Oct 21, 2006 at 11:01:43 AM EST
    Jim,

    Your data do not support your assertion.  Naturalized citizens clearly meet both the dictionary definition of immigrant and of citizen.  It's not even a subtle point.

    Unless you want to claim that Arnold Schwarzenegger ceased to be "a person who migrates to another country, usually for permanent residence" upon getting his citizenship?

    The weird thing is, you might be sort of right anyway.

    Federal immigration law uses this definition:

    The term "immigrant" means every alien except an alien who is within one of the following classes of nonimmigrant aliens...


    Parent
    Re: The Buck Stops Where? (1.00 / 0) (#33)
    by jimakaPPJ on Sat Oct 21, 2006 at 10:20:41 AM EST
    Sailor - I would also note that since probably 80% of the population can and does understand, the "ordinary" comment is met.

    Re: The Buck Stops Where? (none / 0) (#1)
    by sarcastic unnamed one on Thu Oct 19, 2006 at 04:44:11 PM EST
    This has been all over the news here in SoCal.

    I gotta say though, I can't believe any politician would knowingly put out such a letter that clearly contains such a non-truth on such an inflammatory topic as this, as it would obviously be found out and engender huge negative press.

    Which is exactly what happened.

    Whether the word "illegal" next to "immigrant" was inadvertently left out, or Nguyen didn't see the final version before it was sent out, or something else, I don't know. Something wacky happened.

    No way is any pol stupid enough to knowingly send such a letter.

    At least I hope not...

    Re: The Buck Stops Where? (none / 0) (#2)
    by Che's Lounge on Thu Oct 19, 2006 at 04:57:46 PM EST
    Sarcastic unnamed one,

    That was a heartfelt apology. Just beautiful. Brings me to tears...

    laughing.

    Re: The Buck Stops Where? (none / 0) (#3)
    by sarcastic unnamed one on Thu Oct 19, 2006 at 05:12:20 PM EST
    Barbara Coe, founder of the California Coalition for Immigration Reform, said today she met with state investigators and gave them copies of her group's letterhead, which she said differs substantially from the one used on the allegedly phony mailer.

    Curiouser and curiouser.

    Re: The Buck Stops Where? (none / 0) (#4)
    by sarcastic unnamed one on Thu Oct 19, 2006 at 05:22:02 PM EST
    The bulk mail permit used to send out the letter was sent by a Huntington Beach-based company named Mailing Pros. Nguyen's campaign used the company for five different mailers this year...Christopher West, who owns the company...

    ...declined to discuss details of his talk with the agents but said Nguyen was not the person he dealt with. He would not identify the person.

    "The only thing I can say is that the client involved in this is a one-shot customer," Christopher West said. "I haven't seen the person before, and I guess it's unlikely I will see them again."
     

    and curiouser.

    Re: The Buck Stops Where? (none / 0) (#5)
    by scarshapedstar on Thu Oct 19, 2006 at 06:15:50 PM EST
    Oh, yes. It's a Democrat double-cross. Curse that Democrat party, suppressing their own vote!

    Parent
    Re: The Buck Stops Where? (none / 0) (#7)
    by jondee on Thu Oct 19, 2006 at 07:16:09 PM EST
    Do we really have to go through the list of all   the underhanded, equally "stupid" tactics that   have been "knowingly" perpetrated in the last    thirty years by those seeking office? C'mon Sarc.

    Re: The Buck Stops Where? (none / 0) (#8)
    by jimakaPPJ on Thu Oct 19, 2006 at 07:41:07 PM EST
    No, what the letter said was "illegal" immigrants...

    And last time I checked, it is illegal for illegal immigrants to vote...

    I went  and voted today..and discovered that they had ballots available in Spainish? Why? To become a citizen you must be able to speak english.

    Can any of the lawyers on this site expalin that?

    Re: The Buck Stops Where? (none / 0) (#10)
    by scarshapedstar on Thu Oct 19, 2006 at 09:32:52 PM EST
    No, what the letter said was "illegal" immigrants...

    That's what we in the business refer to as a "lie".

    In other words, just another PPJ comment. ;)

    Parent

    Re: The Buck Stops Where? (none / 0) (#9)
    by cpinva on Thu Oct 19, 2006 at 07:42:54 PM EST
    it's him. used someone else. "stupid" and "politician" go together like a horse and carriage. if it works, you can bet it will be replicated.

    Re: The Buck Stops Where? (none / 0) (#11)
    by scarshapedstar on Thu Oct 19, 2006 at 09:42:53 PM EST
    Here's what I'm wondering, though. Where is the Democratic vaccination for this? Why didn't every one of these people get a letter informing them of their rights, when and where and how they can vote, instructing them to be leery of Republican vote-suppression tactics, and telling them how to contact the Democratic party when this stuff inevitably occurs?

    Re: The Buck Stops Where? (none / 0) (#12)
    by cpinva on Fri Oct 20, 2006 at 12:56:21 AM EST
    jim, so far you're the only person, on the face of the planet, that claims the letter refered to "illegal immigrants". could you provide evidence for this assertion?

    scar, you're right, that's exactly what the local dem party should have done. in fact, they should have gone door-to-door in those neighborhoods, posted notices offering rides to polling places in all community centers and churches, etc.

    Re: The Buck Stops Where? (none / 0) (#14)
    by scarshapedstar on Fri Oct 20, 2006 at 04:41:04 AM EST
    in fact, they should have gone door-to-door in those neighborhoods, posted notices offering rides to polling places in all community centers and churches, etc.

    I feel like there was a time when we actually did that kinda thing. Wonder what happened.

    I wonder how many people you can bus to the polls for the price of hiring a professional election loser.

    Actually, I'd rather not think about that. And I'd rather have a shot of whiskey, or two, or six.

    Parent

    Re: The Buck Stops Where? (none / 0) (#13)
    by Che's Lounge on Fri Oct 20, 2006 at 01:50:23 AM EST
    Jim,
    Learning to speak the english language does not mean that everyone can read the wording on the ballots and the initiatives perfectly. It's called courtesy. The reality based community knows this. The question is, why don't you?

    Of course, it could be a vast left wing conspiracy lol.

    Re: The Buck Stops Where? (none / 0) (#15)
    by jimakaPPJ on Fri Oct 20, 2006 at 06:47:23 AM EST
    Che - Courtsey? Following the law is not a courtesy, it is a requirment. If you want to be a citizen, then follow the law, and don't ask me for special favors that you should not need if you truly can handle English as you supposedly could when you were naturalized.

    If that shounds blunt, so be it.

    cpinva - It was in the story shown on AOL's home page..

    Re: The Buck Stops Where? (none / 0) (#16)
    by TChris on Fri Oct 20, 2006 at 07:57:55 AM EST
    No language requirement is imposed on a citizen who is born in the US. Some US-born citizens grow up speaking Spanish.  Ballots are printed in Spanish to facilitate their right to vote.  This isn't a bad thing.

    Re: The Buck Stops Where? (none / 0) (#18)
    by jimakaPPJ on Fri Oct 20, 2006 at 09:31:35 AM EST
    DA - Thank you for your assistance. Let us examine the letter.

    It says that illegal immigrants are breaking the law if they vote. That is true.

    It also says that immigrants are breaking the law if they vote.

    immigrant: one that immigrates: as a : a person who comes to a country to take up permanent residence

    citizen: an inhabitant of a city or town; especially : one entitled to the rights and privileges of a freeman
    2 a : a member of a state b : a native or naturalized person who owes allegiance to a government and is entitled to protection from it

    Now, understanding that an immigrant is not a citizen, but a person in the US on a green card or some type of visa, it is still correct to say that they will be breaking the law if they vote.

    It does not say "naturalized citizens."

    Again, thanks for helping me out.

    Re: The Buck Stops Where? (none / 0) (#20)
    by Repack Rider on Fri Oct 20, 2006 at 09:42:28 AM EST
    It also says that immigrants are breaking the law if they vote.

    Arnold Schwarzenegger is an immigrant.  He was born in Austria, and has taken up permanent residence in the United States, where he is now a citizen, despite the fact that he remains an immigrant by your definition or anyone else's.  Not only does he get to vote, he gets to be governor.

    Being an immigrant and being a citizen are not mutually exclusive conditions.  Why would you claim otherwise?

    Wait, I forgot.  You don't have a case, so you are beating the cr@p out of the table to distract us.

    Parent

    Re: The Buck Stops Where? (none / 0) (#24)
    by scarshapedstar on Fri Oct 20, 2006 at 11:10:22 AM EST
    This is just pathetic.

    Can we invoke the troll-post-deletion policy yet?

    Parent

    Re: The Buck Stops Where? (none / 0) (#25)
    by scarshapedstar on Fri Oct 20, 2006 at 11:13:28 AM EST
    It does not say "naturalized citizens."

    It doesn't say "illegal immigrant" either. But you backed away from that, shall we say, counterfactual assertion, without bothering to comment on how you were called out on a blatant falsehood.

    Why should we take you seriously?

    Parent

    Re: The Buck Stops Where? (none / 0) (#22)
    by Sailor on Fri Oct 20, 2006 at 10:21:47 AM EST
    Applicants for naturalization must be able to read, write, speak, and understand words in ordinary usage in the English language. Applicants exempt from this requirement are those who on the date of filing:

    have been residing in the United States subsequent to a lawful admission for permanent residence for at least 15 years and are over 55 years of age;

    have been residing in the United States subsequent to a lawful admission for permanent residence for at least 20 years and are over 50 years of age; or

    have a medically determinable physical or mental impairment, where the impairment affects the applicant's ability to learn English.

    Here is a random sampling of the wording of a ballot initiave in CA this year:

    8879.37. All money derived from premium and accrued interest on
    bonds sold pursuant to this chapter shall be transferred to the General
    Fund as a credit to expenditures for bond interest.
    I submit that those words are not in 'ordinary usage.'

    So ppj is happy disenfranchising citizens or their right to vote even tho the law disagrees with him.

    Not really a surprise from someone who is against the GenCons and is for torture and secret prisons.

    Re: The Buck Stops Where? (none / 0) (#23)
    by Sailor on Fri Oct 20, 2006 at 10:40:59 AM EST
    Orange County Republican Chairman Scott Baugh said that after speaking with the state attorney general's office and the private company that distributed the letter, he concluded "that not only was Mr. Nguyen's campaign involved in this, but that Mr. Nguyen was personally involved in expediting the mailer."

    Re: The Buck Stops Where? (none / 0) (#27)
    by sarcastic unnamed one on Fri Oct 20, 2006 at 01:09:57 PM EST
    The letter was, without question, untruthful and misleading.

    Funny, though, that so many here believe the GOP on this issue, but scream "lies!" at them on so many others. Anyway...

    The fact that it was a translation into a different language gives some credence (but certainly no excuse) to an "oops" defense, although there has been no such "oops" claim thus far.

    I still have a hard time believing that anyone would purposely do this because such an obvious untruth mailed to 14,000 people on such a contentious issue would so obviously be discovered and end up on the news - such that its actual effect would be the polar opposite of its intention - regardless of whether or not it was traceable back to the actual person responsible for sending it.

    I have a hard time believing that anyone could be such a complete dumba$$.

    However, it'll be interesting to see what Nguyen has to say later on today...

    Re: The Buck Stops Where? (none / 0) (#28)
    by sarcastic unnamed one on Fri Oct 20, 2006 at 01:38:23 PM EST
    Oh, for those who wish to be partisan, Nguyen was a Dem just a couple years ago...

    Tan D. Nguyen is far from your typical candidate. Two years ago, the Vietnamese immigrant ran as a Democrat in Rep. Dana Rohrabacher's heavily Republican coastal district and failed to make it out of the primary. Then he changed his affiliation to Republican and declared his bid to upset Sanchez.


    Re: The Buck Stops Where? (none / 0) (#29)
    by roy on Fri Oct 20, 2006 at 01:57:17 PM EST
    Let's all thank Jim for helping to focus the discussion.  The question of whether ballots should be available in languages voters understand is far more important than threatening to imprison citizens for voting.


    Re: The Buck Stops Where? (none / 0) (#30)
    by Che's Lounge on Fri Oct 20, 2006 at 07:08:14 PM EST
    Time for the troll's disappearing act.

    Re: The Buck Stops Where? (none / 0) (#36)
    by Sailor on Sat Oct 21, 2006 at 11:20:47 AM EST
    ppj sez:
     "The fact that a large portion of our population may not understand your examples is testimony to the failure of our education system."
    ppj's next comment:
    "I would also note that since probably 80% of the population can and does understand, the "ordinary" comment is met. "

    Yet another shining example of ppj's confusion. Got links to either of your mutually exclusive bogus claims?

    ppj:
    "DA - Since my crystal ball is currently under repair I have no way of knowing if the letter was meant to deceive."
    Gee, it was only sent to Dem immigrants, even the rethug party denounced it, a staffer was fired for it and there's an investigation of it. I don't need a crystal ball to see it was meant to decieve.

    ppj is just a rethuglican who wants to deny people who might vote dem the right to vote.

    Re: The Buck Stops Where? (none / 0) (#37)
    by sarcastic unnamed one on Mon Oct 23, 2006 at 12:19:07 PM EST
    Yesteday, from Nguyen's attorney:
    "I acknowledge that somebody connected with the campaign did draft it," said Braniff, adding that the translation of the text had altered its original intent to address only people who were not citizens and thus ineligible to vote.

    Braniff said an initial English-language draft of the mailer made specific references to illegal immigrants and green card holders. The Spanish mailer used the word emigrado, which is defined as someone living outside his or her country, according to the Real Academia Española.

    Braniff claimed that the word has been incorrectly translated as "immigrant" by the public.

    So they're claiming a double "oops." Bad translation from English to Spanish, and then another bad translation from Spanish back to English which compounds the error on such a controversial issue.

    What a dumba$$.

    Buck stops (none / 0) (#38)
    by Sailor on Tue Oct 24, 2006 at 03:24:05 PM EST
    Congressional candidate Tan Nguyen personally bought the list of voters to whom a racially charged letter was mailed, warning that immigrants could be jailed or deported for voting, according to the president of the company that sold the list and sources familiar with the still-unfolding investigation.

    Nguyen requested information on registered Democrats in the central Orange County Congressional district with Spanish surnames who were born outside the United States, according to people familiar with a state investigation into the letter.
    [...]
    The letter went on to falsely claim that the state had developed a tracking system that would allow the names of Latino voters to be given to anti-immigrant groups.