home

Shephard Smith Shames The Beltway

(Guest Post by Big Tent Democrat)

Credit where due, Fox News anchor Shephard Smith does a great job on pointing out to Bill Kristol that the Emperor Bush Has No Clothes.

A Daily Kos diarist has the transcript :

SHEPARD SMITH: "Can't you say beyond...beyond and to the exclusion of every reasonable doubt that what's happening in Iraq is not working as we had hoped it would happen?
BILL KRISTOL: Yes.

SMITH: That the terrorism is getting worse? That they are feeding off it? Today, one side is talking about secession if they don't get over it, that the sectarian violence is spreading, that we're clearing out one area and not able to hold it and the insurgents ... that stay the course isn't working? Any more than, maybe, cut and run would work? And that everyone seems to know, but won't say the answer is to add troops not take them away? Where are the people who are looking out for our best interests?

KRISTOL: Well, I've said that many many times, so often I've been ridiculed for saying "more troops, more troops, more troops." I hope the president...

SMITH: If they really want to win it!

KRISTOL: I agree...I hope...

SMITH: But I think they are just paying lip service to all this! [yelling]

KRISTOL: Well, I hope not because it really wouldn't be the right thing to do and I think President Bush wants to do the right thing and I think he knows there's a problem. He can't probably do anything until election day. I very much hope after election day he takes a fresh look at Iraq, sends enough troops, surges the...goes on the offensive there and plays for victory because..

SMITH: Bill..

KRISTOL: it's just too important to just, you know...

SMITH: It's horrifying that you just said he can't do anything until after the election. We've got men and women over there who are dying every day and you just said that the man who you support can't do anything even though you believe he knows it's wrong.

KRISTOL: I...I...urged him...

SMITH: OK, but what is worse that? What is worse than that, Bill Kristol? This isn't working. Well, isn't that what you are saying?

KRISTOL: It's not working....

SMITH: It's not working.

KRISTOL: It's not working, but some of the alternatives would work, would work worse and to be fair to him he has been....look ... I....Two months ago a Democratic senator said to me, I was saying Bush was going to stay the course and I admire him for his sticktoitive.. for his courage on Iraq and he said, "You're kid... You're crazy...everyone in Washington knows he is going to pull troops down before election day. He wants to give those Republican congressional candidates the benefit of seeing troops come home." It is to Bush's credit that he did not do that. We have moved a few more troops into Iraq. Bush has committed...

SMITH: A few more troops.

KRISTOL: We should... We should ...

SMITH: We're still losing ground in city after city every day...

KRISTOL: I agree we should move more, but I think Bush has done...at least he has held his own ...ummm... I don't know...it's going back and forth there right now... I agree we could hit a crisis in two, three, four months unless we surge troops after the election. I thinks its hard to ask Bush to do something in the middle of this election season. We've seen how poisonous this political debate has gotten and I think... I just hope... I think he's right to hang tough and I hope he does the right thing after election day.

SMITH: That's a disgusting and repulsive reality Bill you have to admit that. That we can't do anything about something that is not working and where people are dying until after our elections are over...
KRISTOL: Well, we could do something... we should do something...but I'm just telling you that....

SMITH: The political reality is we can't.

KRISTOL: it's been a poisonous political debate ...both sides.

SMITH: If I were the mother of a father of a young man who dies between now and that election in this war I would be raising holy hell. Wouldn't you?

KRISTOL: Well, no....

SMITH: Wouldn't you, Bill? If you believed that this isn't working...

KRISTOL: No. They do..they're doing..They think they're doing the best the military strategy

SMITH: Do you think they think that, Bill, really?

KRISTOL: I think they, I think so.

SMITH: Because you don't think so, you just said so.

KRISTOL: Well, I've been critical of them. I think they should send more troops, but other people differ. I think Bush is going to reconsider when he thinks uh..after he gets through this election here. I wish he would have reconsidered six months ago. I urged him to six months ago. He chose not to. But to be fair to him, to be fair to him I think he is doing what he thinks is his best for the country and I think he is right, that the alternative of somehow pulling down wouldn't help. And incidentally, for the mothers and fathers who have kids there my solution does not...does not... decrease the chance of casualties. I'm willing to.. I think we may have to take more casualties there.

SMITH: To win! But what they keep saying is they want to win. And yet you talk to soldiers and captains and colonels who come home or who talk to you on the phone or who send you an email and they say, "Look! We win individual battles. We leave the individual battle and go to the next town and the insurgents come back." It's happening in Afghanistan right now!

KRISTOL: I agree.

SMITH: The Taliban had been wiped out. Now the poppy production is up to supplying 92% because we don't have enough people there. So how fair is it to the people of this country and to the world to be in a process that you know is not working, to know what the solutions are, yet because of the election system and the political process you allow a losing thing to continue?

KRISTOL: Well I think we can make it a winning thing, I think Bush will make it a winning thing, It's a democracy. It has drawbacks.

I agree on Afghanistan,incidentally, that's another place where we're going to have to increase troop levels in the next few weeks.

SMITH: Yeah, but when?

KRISTOL: Soon.

George Bush is a lying incompetent fool and his lines on the campaign trail are the words of an immoral, lying, incompetent idiot. But what about Republicans like Kristol? Shephard Smith asked some obvious questions. The answers were also obvious. But kudos to Smith, I doubt Roger Ailes is happy about this.

< Bill Winter vs. Tom Tancredo: Winter Can Win | Colin Powell Says Bush Fired Him >
  • The Online Magazine with Liberal coverage of crime-related political and injustice news

  • Contribute To TalkLeft


  • Display: Sort:
    Re: Shephard Smith Shames The Beltway (none / 0) (#1)
    by cpinva on Sun Oct 01, 2006 at 11:06:08 AM EST
    oh my gosh, how enlightening! jesus holy f*ck, it took him nearly 6 years to figure this out? with this kind of inspired insight, it's no wonder that fox is at the top of the newscast heap.

    Re: Shephard Smith Shames The Beltway (none / 0) (#3)
    by jimakaPPJ on Sun Oct 01, 2006 at 11:26:22 AM EST
    Shep makes the point that the political debate and process is poisoned beyond belief. Who poisoned it? The Left. Shep makes the point that the terrorists return when we leave. Why is that? Because the Left has convinced them that if they just hang on, fade away and come back, kill a few Americans... that they can win when a Demo administration takes power and withdraws. The Demos should hang their heads in shame.

    Re: Shephard Smith Shames The Beltway (none / 0) (#2)
    by Dadler on Sun Oct 01, 2006 at 12:04:25 PM EST
    Now, when he resigns in protest from his war-mongering, propagandizing, anti-intellectual network we may have something. Why are you there, Shep? You've obviously had the ephiphany that many of us had BEFORE this bloody fiasco. Why...are...you...there?

    Re: Shephard Smith Shames The Beltway (none / 0) (#4)
    by Dadler on Sun Oct 01, 2006 at 12:04:25 PM EST
    Jim, I don't think I'll be addressing you on this issue anymore, there is simply no point, and it's just too depressing. But that two free Americans can be so diametrically opposed on an issue of such shared blame is just depressing. Beyond depressing. I marched against this war, Jim, and I was ready to debate, and I was ready to use facts and patient, evolved human intellect. But I, and those like me, were ignored, ridiculed, labeled as terrorist-loving. We were free Americans told that the exercise of our freedom meant we were traitors. I cannot accept or understand at this point (beyond a really profound inability to be self-critical on this issue) why you will not even countenance any responsibility on the part of the right for this mess. That's just not honest to me, my friend. It's denial and delusion, in my opinion. But you don't think five cents of my opinion, and I don't think five cents of yours. That's a bad state to be in. Peace.

    Re: Shephard Smith Shames The Beltway (none / 0) (#5)
    by Big Tent Democrat on Sun Oct 01, 2006 at 12:04:25 PM EST
    Jim: You know that was not Smith's point. At least I hope you do. The question is not political debate, the question is the Commander in Chief, according to Kristol, is continuing a terrible strategy in Iraq because of political concerns. When loves and a key, if not the key, national security concern is treated as a political football by the PResident. That is what his disgust is about. I treat you with respect here, and I know many do not, but this comment of yours is borderline trollish in my view. I hope you do better than that in the future.

    Re: Shephard Smith Shames The Beltway (none / 0) (#6)
    by scarshapedstar on Sun Oct 01, 2006 at 12:18:11 PM EST
    Okay, it's finally settled, PPJ is a parody.

    Re: Shephard Smith Shames The Beltway (none / 0) (#7)
    by Edger on Sun Oct 01, 2006 at 12:50:28 PM EST
    Big Tent: Jim...You know that was not Smith's point. At least I hope you do. Big Tent, I'm sure you've read enough of his posts here to know that for the most part he is here not to "debate" but only "to bait" e.g.:
    Posted by JimakaPPJ September 29, 2006 09:26 AM edger - Thanks for the agreement, and thanks for taking the bait.


    Re: Shephard Smith Shames The Beltway (none / 0) (#8)
    by Edger on Sun Oct 01, 2006 at 01:51:35 PM EST
    Smith is doing what any good reporter should be doing after observing bush and this administration in action. Shining the brightest possible light on them and pointing out, with facts, that they see all problems, including the death and maiming of American troops, and of Iraqis, as "PR problems" for them, and as obstacles to their interest in keeping and consolidating power, not as issues and challenges to be approached and dealt with honestly, and that human beings are incidental, meaningless numbers to them. All of the MSM should be doing this. 24/7.

    Re: Shephard Smith Shames The Beltway (none / 0) (#9)
    by Che's Lounge on Sun Oct 01, 2006 at 04:19:40 PM EST
    Shep makes the point that the terrorists return when we leave. Based on what, his usual insight? Smith is irrelevant, as is the above observation. There is absolutely NO PROOF that Iraq would become a haven for "terrorists" if we split. This is just another deliberate scare tactic by the war mongers and their mindless parrot followers to perpetuate the violence and profiteering.

    Re: Shephard Smith Shames The Beltway (none / 0) (#11)
    by jimakaPPJ on Sun Oct 01, 2006 at 05:26:38 PM EST
    Che - You need to watch the film clip. Shep said that. edger - The facts are simple. If Bush puts in troops now, the Demos will use that as a "talking point," etc. So he waits. You know, to win you have to know when to attack, and when to wait. edger - Quit taking the bait and maybe the world will quit fishing you. Big Tent - When did you become a fan of Kristol as a military strategy guy? Oh. I know. When he criticized Bush. How discernining of you. Dadler - Your protests about how you were ignored are truly funny, especially in light of what Trot out Gen. Giap all you want, you're stating the obvious, that protest worked. Sorry it helped "the enemy", but no Vietnamese communist fighting Western colonialism ever did a thing to me. Can we change Vietnamese communist to terrorist?? And yes, every since you wrote the above your opinion has had a certain odor to it.

    Re: Shephard Smith Shames The Beltway (none / 0) (#12)
    by Talkleft Visitor on Sun Oct 01, 2006 at 07:37:48 PM EST
    I wonder if Smiths subtext here is a signal to bushco that Fox is no longer in their pocket as firmly as they would like, and that Fox can read the writing on the wall as well as anyone else - that the majority of the population expects bushco to serve America, not themselves. Is there also perhaps a warning to bushco from some of Fox's top advertisers that bushco may not be able to count on their support as much as in the past? ---edger

    Re: Shephard Smith Shames The Beltway (none / 0) (#13)
    by Che's Lounge on Sun Oct 01, 2006 at 08:00:47 PM EST
    Jim, If you actually watch the clip, you will find that both of these "men" agree on one key point. They both want to escalate the hostilities. et al: IMHO the moderate Dems will sell out on the idea of increasing troop levels. This war is not going away anytime soon.

    Re: Shephard Smith Shames The Beltway (none / 0) (#10)
    by Edger on Sun Oct 01, 2006 at 08:24:44 PM EST
    I wonder if the subtext here is a signal to bushco that Fox is no longer in their pocket as firmly as they would like, and that Fox can read the writing on the wall as well as anyone else - that the majority of the population expects bushco to serve America, not themselves. Is there also perhaps a warning to bushco from some of Fox's top advertisers that bushco may not be able to count on their support as much as in the past?

    Re: Shephard Smith Shames The Beltway (none / 0) (#14)
    by Ernesto Del Mundo on Mon Oct 02, 2006 at 11:41:16 AM EST
    All I got out of that exchange is that a Fox reporter and a Neocon agree that many more lower class kids should be sent to die for a warped world vision by a bunch of criminals. This is something to be heartened by?