[O]n Tuesday, May 20, 2003, there was a massive blitz of television stories on "sexual predators". The same day, the local county board of supervisors launched their day-long "Chairman's Conference on Sexual Predators". It included the law enforcement community, the prosecutors, and just about everyone that has a financial stake in a War on Sex. The TV blitz and county conference timing seemed powerfully coordinated. We guessed that the conference was funded by a massive OJJP grant that had been published in the Federal Register. We have since learned we were right. Their main objectives were to change the laws regarding minor offenses, to major felonies for "sexual predator" crimes (in which they included possession of child pornography), and to insure massive punishments, such as life imprisonment, as they asserted that "sexual deviants cannot be cured". They planned to pursue massive new grants for myriad programs under this cash-cow. Yet commensurate with our moratorium on the War-on Sex, some 30,000 registered sex offenders failed to register in California. If the 400 victims per offender figure was real, we would have seen an enormous number of offences by those 30,000 ("incurables") in that time. We didn't. The number is obviously wholly exaggerated. Back on August 29th 2001, the Scottish Rite Center hosted the "First Bilateral Conference on Commercial & Sexual Exploitation of Minors", a salient in the anti-sex, anti-nudism and anti-pornography pogroms. Dr. RICHARD ESTES from the University of Pennsylvania was the chief attack-dog, introducing his iatrogenics. Dr. ESTES warned that there were probably pedophiles secretly in attendance, and he pronounced "pedophiles" with the same hate, loathing, animus and disdain as other bigots might intone the slur, "nigger-lover". Dr. ESTES laid out conference goals as being to initiate fundamental change in the laws, including, raising the age-of-consent in all 50 states, and then around the world. He stressed the agenda of passing harsh criminal sanctions against child pornography and sexual relations involving minors. To fail to do so, he insisted, was to invite acceptance, and "normalcy". We inquired at the conference, "what is the critical mass necessary to achieve 'normalcy'?" ... While the Miller decision pretended to Community Values, (a ruse; witness the pogrom at Samagatuma or the California Proposition 215), at least Miller respected literary, artistic, political, and scientific value. New York v. Ferber, fails dismally in that regard. Without the multi-disciplinary examination of a social current or group, then what we have with Ferber, is a grotesque caricature of early human sexuality pathologically perverted to the narrow purview of police mostly operating in their self-interest.