home

Lieberman Fires Campaign Staff

The AP reported this afternoon that Joe Lieberman fired his top staffers and asked the rest to resign:

Lieberman said that he fired his campaign manager and spokesman, and asked for the resignations of his campaign staff.

"We did not answer, adequately answer, the distortions of my record on Iraq and my relationship with George Bush, that the Lamont campaign put out," said Lieberman, though he said he did not blame campaign workers.

Is Karl Rove going to suggest replacements? Maybe not, as Lieberman's campaign is now denying today's earlier report that Rove called to offer help.

Dan Gerstein called from the Lieberman campaign to say the above account from another Lieberman adviser is not accurate. While confirming that Rove called Lieberman, he added: "Rove made a personal call, no help was offered, and we are not interested regardless." A senior White House official also says that the account is "not accurate."

Update: The Carpetbagger Report says not all the departures were at the behest of Lieberman. Some of the staff decided to leave weeks ago if Lieberman lost to Lamont and left the Democratic party.

< Will Ken Salazar Stick to Support for Lieberman? | 1,815 Dead in Baghdad Morgue in July >
  • The Online Magazine with Liberal coverage of crime-related political and injustice news

  • Contribute To TalkLeft


  • Display: Sort:
    Re: Lieberman Fires Campaign Staff (none / 0) (#1)
    by squeaky on Wed Aug 09, 2006 at 06:23:17 PM EST
    Well yeah, assuming that the campaign staff are not just mercenaries, why would<./i> they want to continue working for a turncoat.

    Re: Lieberman Fires Campaign Staff (none / 0) (#2)
    by weezie on Wed Aug 09, 2006 at 06:45:33 PM EST
    I dunno, I feel sorry for Joe. He's trying to stand up for Israel and here he is taking the hit for Iraq. It's a shame, he seems like a pretty decent man. I wonder how the committee assignments will be impacted when Lamont takes office. Don't doubt for a minute that Rove has this figured out and is circling for a point. More lives than a cat....

    Re: Lieberman Fires Campaign Staff (none / 0) (#3)
    by Sailor on Wed Aug 09, 2006 at 07:28:42 PM EST
    Who would have thought Katherine Harris and Joe Lieberman were separated at birth.;-) And TL, that sounded a lot like ' a polite "thanks but no thanks"' And the WH issued a non-denial denial. They didn't say it wasn't true, they said it wasn't 'accurate.'

    Re: Lieberman Fires Campaign Staff (none / 0) (#4)
    by jondee on Wed Aug 09, 2006 at 08:14:40 PM EST
    Just like they had no connection to the Swift Vet adds. These people cannot tell a lie.

    Re: Lieberman Fires Campaign Staff (none / 0) (#5)
    by Wes on Thu Aug 10, 2006 at 01:54:51 AM EST
    Via Political Wire Longtime Lieberman aide Sherry Brown and his former senate press secretary Dan Gerstein have joined the campaign. In addition, The Hotline notes all remaining staff and consultants have resigned.
    "We did not answer, adequately answer, the distortions of my record on Iraq and my relationship with George Bush, that the Lamont campaign put out," said Lieberman, though he said he did not blame campaign workers.
    Right.

    Re: Lieberman Fires Campaign Staff (none / 0) (#6)
    by Talkleft Visitor on Thu Aug 10, 2006 at 04:27:39 AM EST
    In the run-up to the Connecticut primary, 14,000 new voters registered as Democrats and another 14,000 switched their registration from unaffiliated to Democrat to vote in the primary
    The above taken from a piece by Arianna. Perhaps someone might kindly explain the "Registered" part of the political process, why, and what is the implication. It's not something we see this side of the pond. Thanks.

    Re: Lieberman Fires Campaign Staff (none / 0) (#7)
    by Slado on Thu Aug 10, 2006 at 06:29:25 AM EST
    Oscar, Basically you declare yourself as a member of a particular party or as an independent when you register to vote. In our system you have to register to vote in your area or precicnt. So if you move simply across town you may not be eligible to vote because you have moved out of your precinct area. So if you aren't registered you could re-register and change parties or declare a party that you hadn't before. So presumably some might have been nader or green party voters changing to democrats to boot out Liberman, or undeclared or even republicans with alterior motives. More then likely they were new voters, students, people who hadn't voted in a long etc... that where encouraged to register as democrats or to vote in primaries when they don't so they could overtake the traditional democrats that were loyal to Liberman. That is why the turnout was high. There were lots of new voters. There is nothing shady about this just a change in tactics that both parties now use. Republicans have increased their turnout by focusing on "traditional" voters who typically didn't vote before. Church members etc... Democrats have focused on students, progressives, hippies etc... The theory is its easier to count on the vote of a newly registered voter whose registered as a Repulican/Democrat then trying to convince a voter from the other side to vote against their party. Its all a numbers game now focused on turnout. Get as many voters who identify with your views or issues to the polls and then try to get just enough voters to switch to push you over the top.

    Re: Lieberman Fires Campaign Staff (none / 0) (#8)
    by jimcee on Thu Aug 10, 2006 at 06:35:10 AM EST
    It seems to me that cleaning house is probably a good idea for Lieberman because obviously they couldn't get the job done. On the flip side although Lamont won the primary by running as the 'anti-Bush' candidate and painted Lieberman as being 'too close' to Bush, 48% of democrats who voted in the primary still voted for Lieberman. The fact that primaries bring out the most dedicated and strident party members and almost half of them voted for Lieberman doesn't bode well for Lamontites come November.

    Re: Lieberman Fires Campaign Staff (none / 0) (#9)
    by Jlvngstn on Thu Aug 10, 2006 at 07:43:21 AM EST
    Seems appropriate seeing that the voters have essentially fired him in the first round. Perhaps a bit of introspective might be helpful to Joe.

    Re: Lieberman Fires Campaign Staff (none / 0) (#10)
    by nolo on Thu Aug 10, 2006 at 07:49:35 AM EST
    Oscar, in many states of the U.S. voters have to declare their party affiliation for purposes of voting in primary elections, because voting in primary elections in those states is restricted by party affiliation. In other words, when a primary election comes up in those states, voters who are registered Republicans get the Republican primary ballot, and voters who are registered Democrats get the Democratic primary ballot. In those states, there usually is some kind of deadline for declaring one's affiliation prior to the election date in order to limit opportunistic party-switching (i.e., the practice of voting in the opposing party's primary in a way that is intended to throw the election to a weaker candidate). The wikipedia entry on primaries provides a pretty good overview.

    Re: Lieberman Fires Campaign Staff (none / 0) (#11)
    by Repack Rider on Thu Aug 10, 2006 at 07:59:33 AM EST
    The fact that primaries bring out the most dedicated and strident party members and almost half of them voted for Lieberman doesn't bode well for Lamontites come November. Please. Lieberman's support from every quarter will evaporate so quickly that he will wonder whether he was EVER elected. It's Lamont in a stroll. Lieberman is toast, and you can take that to the bank, if they haven't had breakfast there yet.

    Re: Lieberman Fires Campaign Staff (none / 0) (#12)
    by Talkleft Visitor on Thu Aug 10, 2006 at 08:41:16 AM EST
    Slado thank you for taking the trouble of your reply. And Nolo,
    and voters who are registered Democrats get the Democratic primary ballot.
    of course, how slow of me, it being solely a party election 'n all. And explains the "why" of it all. Many thanks to you both.

    Re: Lieberman Fires Campaign Staff (none / 0) (#13)
    by nolo on Thu Aug 10, 2006 at 09:49:35 AM EST
    oscar, you're not being slow at all. U.S. election practices are waaaay crazy sometimes, and not all primaries are restricted by party (believe it or not). Some states have open primaries where anyone can vote for anybody.

    Re: Lieberman Fires Campaign Staff (none / 0) (#14)
    by Talkleft Visitor on Thu Aug 10, 2006 at 12:50:56 PM EST
    Lamont only got 52% of the Democratic primary votes. If all the Democrats who supported Lieberman before the primary as being the better choice are really now going to vote against him because Lamont is the "anointed" Democratic nominee, then it proves that Connecticut has a lot of people who would sooner vote for a yellow dog than vote for someone who is not nominated as a Democrat.

    Re: Lieberman Fires Campaign Staff (none / 0) (#15)
    by Talkleft Visitor on Thu Aug 10, 2006 at 01:05:19 PM EST
    "Lieberman Fires Campaign Staff" How very interesting, now that they've joined him in getting fired his staff can get drunk with him and they can all curse their ex-bosses. Democratic voters, that is.