It is well-settled that imprisonment does not automatically deprive a prisoner of his or her constitutional rights or valid constitutional claims

....Imprisonment does permit greater restriction of constitutional rights than would otherwise be constitutionally valid and many constitutional rights enjoyed prior to incarceration are curtailed or lost upon imprisonment.

....The Supreme Court has consistently held that incarceration necessarily limits any privileges and rights, and in Johnson, expressly referred to many rights that may be so limited, such as First Amendment challenges to prison regulations, restrictions on freedom of association, limitations on inmate correspondence, restrictions on inmates' access to courts, restrictions on receipt of subscription publications, the involuntary medication of mentally ill prisoners, and restrictions on the right to marry.

....A woman's right to terminate her pregnancy is encompassed by the right of privacy founded in the Fourteenth Amendment's concept of personal liberty.

The Court's conclusion:

For the forgoing reasons, the Court concludes that Defendants' Policy violates both the Fourteenth and Eighth Amendments of the United States Constitution. Plaintiffs' Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 57) is GRANTED. Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment is DENIED.