home

Second Duke Lacrosse Dancer Talks to Vanity Fair

Exotic dancer Kim Roberts doesn't want to wait for the courtroom to tell her story. Here she is in Vanity Fair.

With every statement she makes, she provides impeachment for the defense on her prior statements. Will she never learn?

< Quote From Gay Marriage Debate | DNA Frees Conn. Inmate >
  • Premium Ads

  • Blog Ads

  • Contribute To TalkLeft

    donate to TalkLeft


  • Display: Sort:
    Re: Second Duke Lacrosse Dancer Talks to Vanity Fa (none / 0) (#1)
    by cpinva on Wed Jun 07, 2006 at 04:17:41 AM EST
    not to be too harsh, but as a general rule, the individuals populating that particular occupation aren't doing it because they decided it would be more lucrative than the other option open to them, neurosurgeon.

    Talk Left posted:
    With every statement she makes, she provides impeachment for the defense on her prior statements. Will she never learn?
    cpiva posted:
    not to be too harsh, but as a general rule, the individuals populating that particular occupation aren't doing it because they decided it would be more lucrative than the other option open to them, neurosurgeon.
    I wouldn't underestimate Kim or the accuser. If they were a couple of ignorant skank 'Ho's, this would have been over a long time ago. Kim's story is not all that complicated. I think she used the word "elementary" to describe the facts of the case as they apply to her knowledge of what went on that night. The players obviously have the means to have committed the assaults, Kim can supply the motive and opportunity. Kim is THE ONE PERSON the defense wishes was in their corner. Butch totally "screwed the pooch' when he applied pressure to get Kim to sign a statement. She is not one to be pushed around.
    "We believe ... her story has been motivated by her own self-interest," said attorney Bill Thomas, who represents one of the uncharged players. "I think that a jury will ultimately have to decide the question of her credibility."
    And what self-interests do the defense eyewitnesses to the party have? Hmmm? Jurors are not that stupid. From the Newsday article:
    "I fit the bill as Hispanic, so they were assuming the next girl would be white," Roberts told the magazine, explaining that she is sometimes mistaken for Latina. "And then here she comes, walking around the corner."
    This could just be a figure of speech, but it does seem that Kim may have been waiting in the backyard Keg party area watching the gentlemen urinate off the back porch when the accuser "comes, walking around the corner." Kim says she and the accuser chatted behind the house, so they did not go to her car to get to know each other, how did Bissey witness them walking up the alley/walkway together upon their arrival? from the same article:
    In the Vanity Fair story, defense attorney Bill Thomas said Roberts used her own racially charged insult by calling the player who shouted the broomstick remark a "white boy," then questioning his sexual prowess.
    How pathetically lame an excuse is that for the athlete scholars to have used their own racial epithets? This is some of the worst PR I have ever seen defense attorneys generate for their clients.

    Well, Kim didn't say a whole lot in the vanityfair.com piece. Perhaps there's more in the July print issue? With her probation violation hearing looming, this may be all she's willing to tell for now. If it's a matter of cash, I'll chip in $20, as would many from all around the globe.

    Re: Second Duke Lacrosse Dancer Talks to Vanity Fa (none / 0) (#4)
    by james on Wed Jun 07, 2006 at 06:37:34 AM EST
    That's right, both women are manipulative. You should understand that Kim definately has some things (in her mind) to gain from this episode. #1 is a resolution of her probation issue which would send anyone else in NC to a work camp and #2 she has said in the News and Observer that she wishes to profit off of this (to feed her kid, of course). You can't 'sell' a story if it's boring. Actually though, the more important one for her is probably the parole issue. If she didn't cooperate she would have found herself headed to Butner, NC (women's prison) and probably on to Wilmington (work camp). They don't let you run from probation and then let you go here... The lawyer didn't 'pressure' her if talking to her is pressuring her. The 'truth' is that she apparently went cold on him in the space of a day - the day during which Nifong spoke to her and a day before she got special bail treatment.

    fillintheblanks posted:
    Well, Kim didn't say a whole lot in the vanityfair.com piece. Perhaps there's more in the July print issue?
    That's just a teaser from the Vanity Fair Press Room. James posted:
    The lawyer didn't 'pressure' her if talking to her is pressuring her. The 'truth' is that she apparently went cold on him in the space of a day - the day during which Nifong spoke to her and a day before she got special bail treatment.
    According to Kim, when she hesitated to sign a statement, Butch Williams kept mentioning the photos they have of her from that night. Kim is not stupid, she knew what he was doing. She says she told him she was calling the police and hung up on him. He blew it. Plain and simple. It's one thing for her to not sign the statement, it's another to have her pissed off at the defense attorneys. Do you know what day Kim hung up on Butch?

    I didn't see any times mentioned. Maybe Nifong is still juggling his timeline. I guess this is going to be the theme: "You have to think of two little girls among how many big boys?"em> Which finger did Roberts wave at the press at her hearing?

    Re: Second Duke Lacrosse Dancer Talks to Vanity Fa (none / 0) (#7)
    by Jlvngstn on Wed Jun 07, 2006 at 07:08:19 AM EST
    "Kim is not stupid" And how would you know this?

    Re: Second Duke Lacrosse Dancer Talks to Vanity Fa (none / 0) (#8)
    by azbballfan on Wed Jun 07, 2006 at 07:10:34 AM EST
    Sharon wrote:
    by all accounts, the cancellation of the (I know it is an unfortunate term, but it is a term for group counselling) group grope was at the insistence of the players' parents, not attorneys. The majority of them had not even retained counsel, at that point.
    If you go back and read the accounts of the morning the lacrosse players gave sample DNA, a lawyer for the defense was present holding the front door of the office open reminding them all not to say a thing. The group meeting was cancelled shortly thereafter. wumhenry: I have addressed your call outs. You simply chose to have selective reading (and editing of my posts). I can't figure out if you and Sharon think Nifong is part of a vast right wing conspiracy or a vast left wing conspiracy, but you both are sounding a bit like vintage Hillary.

    It will be interesting to examine Roberts' various public statements and measure them against not only each other but also any sworn statements made in this case. She's already moved herself to the position of being a "little girl" in a dangerous place. Can we expect court appearances by Roberts in school uniforms with a short plaid skirt and white knee-high socks and patent-leather shoes?

    imho posted:
    "Kim is not stupid"
    Jlvngstn posted:
    And how would you know this?
    She hung up on Butch Williams. That makes her smarter than Dan Flannery.

    It is sad that our court system does not provide for the future of the victim or the players. Because is is limited to showing 'right' vs 'wrong' the current court system does not acknowledge everyone's suffering, and does not offer a path to a better future for any. A 'fair' system would acknowledge the suffering of the victims -- who went to this drunken LaCrosse party, were slobbered on and insulted by the players, and probably hit-on. It would also acknowledge the suffering of the players, who were shamefully drunk in public and have been accused of heinous crimes. A 'fair' system would have the players acknowledge the impact of their behavior on the victims, and make sincere apology. A 'fair' system would have the victims acknowledge their stupidity in coming to the party ready to strip, and in staying once the conditions were known. Suffering or jail should not be the outcome any of us is seeking. But that seems to be the only choices now offered by the system that sees things in black and white, and does not ask questions that would make the future better for any of the parties involved.

    IMHO says: "How pathetically lame an excuse is that for the athlete scholars to have used their own racial epithets?" First off, it was the lawyer who offered the excuse. From his statement, it was Roberts who first began using racial epithets. Wrong that the attendees replied in kind, wrong that "little girl" Roberts spit out the first racist comment. The next time IMHO, PB, Lora or any of the defenders of the AV's version of reality that night mentions the racial epithet about the "cotton shirt" remember that Roberts cast the first racist remark that night. And I am shocked! shocked! that men who hired strippers may have made rude, sexually explicit remarks to the dancers. One can expect sexual banter in the audience of a strip show, why else have a strip show, but Roberts could have voiced her displeasure of out-of-line comments without resorting to racial commentary. Now that we've taken care of the preliminaries, where's there any evidence of a gangrape?

    Re: Second Duke Lacrosse Dancer Talks to Vanity Fa (none / 0) (#13)
    by Jlvngstn on Wed Jun 07, 2006 at 07:26:35 AM EST
    Congratulations to every american that hangs up on telemarketers, you are definitely not stupid.

    Bob in Pacifica asks:'
    Can we expect court appearances by Roberts in school uniforms with a short plaid skirt and white knee-high socks and patent-leather shoes?
    Kirk Osborn's description of Reade Seligmann:
    "This young kid wants to go to school in the fall."
    Yeah, maybe Reade will offer to carry her books.

    Jlvngstn posted:
    Congratulations to every american that hangs up on telemarketers, you are definitely not stupid.
    I don't think Butch Williams was trying to sell Kim a Popeil Pocket Fisherman.

    IMHO wrote: If they were a couple of ignorant skank 'Ho's, this would have been over a long time ago. And so after Nifong took their statements and reviewed their sexual histories, he had them take IQ tests before he asked for indictments? Seems to me that ignorant skank hos should have justice under the law, too. By the way, with your use of phrase "ignorant skank ho" in defense of Roberts and the AV, does this mean that it's okay for people who don't find the AV's version of events to be credible, or who view Roberts as an unreliable manipulative convicted embezzler, to use the phrase "ignorant skank ho"? That is, do you own the phrase or do you share it?

    Roberts waited for approximately 30 minutes for the other dancer to arrive and during that time she observed some of the young men relieving themselves outside. "There was plenty of pissing off the porch," she says.
    It looks like it was not a big deal for these players that the bathroom was locked for sometime during the allaged rape or dancers locking themselves inside.

    Bob In Pacifica posted:
    First off, it was the lawyer who offered the excuse.
    Yes, and I was criticizing the lawyer that said it:
    How pathetically lame an excuse is that for the athlete scholars to have used their own racial epithets? This is some of the worst PR I have ever seen defense attorneys generate for their clients.
    Bob In Pacifica posted:
    The next time IMHO, PB, Lora or any of the defenders of the AV's version of reality that night mentions the racial epithet about the "cotton shirt" remember that Roberts cast the first racist remark that night.
    That is one version of the story. Even if it is true, do you not find it amusing the attorney is using the behavior of a stripper to explain the behavior of the scholar athletes? I do.

    Hicht posted:
    It looks like it was not a big deal for these players that the bathroom was locked for sometime during the allaged rape or dancers locking themselves inside.
    Yep. Good point, Hicht.

    Bob In Pacifica posted:
    And so after Nifong took their statements and reviewed their sexual histories, he had them take IQ tests before he asked for indictments?
    I think he made an assessment of their credibility. Bob In Pacifica posted:
    Seems to me that ignorant skank hos should have justice under the law, too.
    You might want to see how potential juror wumhenry feels about that: wumhenry posted:
    How likely is it that a *prostitute* would be reduced to hysteria by shame and guilt because she was dicked without her consent?
    Bob In Pacifica posted:
    By the way, with your use of phrase "ignorant skank ho" in defense of Roberts and the AV, does this mean that it's okay for people who don't find the AV's version of events to be credible, or who view Roberts as an unreliable manipulative convicted embezzler, to use the phrase "ignorant skank ho"? That is, do you own the phrase or do you share it?
    It is a phrase I use in jest. I don't care what you call Kim or the accuser. In my opinion you, Bob, couldn't go lower than you all ready have. I'm sure the defense attorneys wish Kim and the accuser were not intelligent, educated women.

    SharonInJax posted:
    imho: the defense was adamant, and I think it is a telling point, that the "sample" was NOT under the nail. Life or death struggle (according to the search warrant affadavit) and all the DNA that can be found is on one nail?
    Do you have a source for that? abcnews.com
    Chesire conceded Friday that the results show that genetic material from beneath a plastic fingernail recovered from a garbage can at the scene of the alleged crime has "some characteristics'' of "one or two'' players' DNA, but that none of the tests show any conclusive matches. He acknowledged that the report names a third player, but declined to identify that player.


    MS wrote:
    A 'fair' system would acknowledge the suffering of the victims -- who went to this drunken LaCrosse party, were slobbered on and insulted by the players, and probably hit-on.
    So they are victims simply by doing the job they voluntarily agreed to do? Good grief! They took money to take their clothes off in front of group of men. That makes them strippers. No one forced them to take their clothes off. It was a job they agreed to take from their employers. The whole idea of the job is to make the guys "slobber on" them.

    In the last thread TL asked:
    Question: Does anyone have any thoughts as to the cases Nifong may be neglecting in favor of prosecuting and investigating this one?
    Freda Black, arguably not an unbiased source, made some comment after the re-instatement of the open container/public urination/etc. deferred prosecutions that I found interesting. I don't recall the program (they all tend to run together), and I'm paraphrasing the quote, but it was to the effect that the Durham court systems are already significantly backlogged, to the tune of several months, as there weren't enough judges and prosecutorial staff to handle the load. She seemed to think that the re-instatement of the charges was not only a bad prosecutorial move on Nifong's part, but also an unnecessary burden on an already taxed court system in the area. Take it for what it was worth, but I do think it an interesting point to ponder. I also feel bad for those stuck twiddling their thumbs for timely due process because they didn't have the luck(?) to end up on the Abrams Report.

    Roberts tells Bissinger she could sense the hesitation in the young men milling about when the second dancer, who is black, arrived. The person who had told her that a white dancer had been requested "expressed in some way that they might not be happy" with the second dancer, says Roberts. "I can't remember how he put it or what way he said it, but I said to him, 'Well, they're going to have to make a decision and make it now.'
    I remember there were allot of av supporters here that had the conjecture that the white players hired black strippers specifically because they liked demeaning black women and thought they could get away with raping a black stripper. Her statement kind of blows that out of the water, huh?

    Re: Second Duke Lacrosse Dancer Talks to Vanity Fa (none / 0) (#25)
    by wumhenry on Wed Jun 07, 2006 at 09:11:05 AM EST
    I neither said nor implied that raping a prostitute is OK. Rather, I asked how likely it is that a prostitute would be "reduced to hysteria by shame and guilt" (quoting someone else's conjectural description of the AV's state of mind)if dicked without her consent. Someone who frequently and routinely has sex for money with any stranger who'll pay her price might be very frustrated and angry if someone forced her to submit to do it for nothing, but it's far from clear to me why she'd feel either ashamed or guilty, let alone be reduced to hysteria by those emotions. So far no one here, including the person who took it for granted that the AV, who is a prostitute, would react in that way if forced to "give it away for free," has deigned to answer the question, but I still think it's a good one.

    Bob in Pacifica posted:
    The next time IMHO, PB, Lora or any of the defenders of the AV's version of reality that night mentions the racial epithet about the "cotton shirt" remember that Roberts cast the first racist remark that night.
    Do we know Kim was the first one to use a racial epithet that night? Dancer gives details of ordeal N & O Mar 25, 2006
    Just moments after she and another exotic dancer started to perform, she said, men in the house started barking racial slurs. The two women, both black, stopped dancing.
    Mother, dancer, accuser Apr 16, 2006
    The woman said she and another dancer sent by a second escort service stopped dancing because several men at the party yelled a racial slur. In a court document used to obtain DNA samples from lacrosse team members, the woman said one man in the room threatened to sexually assault her with a broom handle.
    Kim didn't think the accuser heard the "cotton shirt" taunt. She also didn't think she heard them call Kim a "damn n*gger." Perhaps the players used racial taunts before the altercation spilled out into the street. The defense attorneys are owning up to the "cotton shirt" remark because Bissey heard it.

    Re: Second Duke Lacrosse Dancer Talks to Vanity Fa (none / 0) (#27)
    by wumhenry on Wed Jun 07, 2006 at 09:18:47 AM EST
    inmyhumbleopinion wrote:
    In my opinion you, Bob, couldn't go lower than you all ready have.
    Is there a rule against ad hominem attacks in this forum?

    Re: Second Duke Lacrosse Dancer Talks to Vanity Fa (none / 0) (#28)
    by Jlvngstn on Wed Jun 07, 2006 at 09:22:39 AM EST
    My apologies to all americans who have hung up on telemarketers. If you want to prove you are not stupid, call a lawyer and hang up on them. I have it on great authority that hanging up on an attorney will permanently place you in the non stupid category.

    wumhenry posted:
    I neither said nor implied that raping a prostitute is OK.
    Your "dicked without her consent" comment was serious? I thought you were just being insulting. So, now you are comparing a prostitute being raped to someone being forced to "give it away for free?" You think she might feel "very frustrated and angry if someone forced her to submit to do it for nothing," but doubt she'd feel shame or guilt "let alone be reduced to hysteria by those emotions?" wumhenry, it is a very good question, in that, it answers more than it asks.

    IMHO says: In my opinion you, Bob, couldn't go lower than you all ready have. For finding the AV unbelievable? For wondering about why she was hospitalized for a mental illness last year? For pointing out that she's made four previous charges against men, three for rape and one for a death threat (or attempt) and then failed to pursue any of them? That she stole a car and drove while drunk in a reckless manner and tried to and was charged with trying to run over a cop with the stolen car? For changing her story about whether or not there was a rape that night? Yeah, those are terrible things to do. But maybe I was just talking in jest. Hey, maybe you were talking in jest when you were insulting me. Ha ha ha. +++ By the way, can anyone tell me of any evidence that a gang rape occurred that night? Even "Little Girl" Roberts doesn't seem to have anything.

    Jlvngstn posted:
    My apologies to all americans who have hung up on telemarketers. If you want to prove you are not stupid, call a lawyer and hang up on them. I have it on great authority that hanging up on an attorney will permanently place you in the non stupid category.
    When an attorney tries to intimidate you into signing a statement, hang up on the attorney. 'Weird evening' was just the start
    As the national media seized on the story, Roberts called James "Butch" Williams Jr., who told her he represented a player and couldn't advise or represent her. When Williams asked whether she thought a rape occurred that night, Roberts said no. When Williams asked her to give a sworn statement, Roberts said she would sleep on it.
    Several days of discussion ended when Williams brought up pictures taken of the dancers at the party, Roberts said.
    "He kept mentioning my statement and the pictures in the same breath," Roberts said. "What are you trying to say, Butch? Are you trying to say if I don't sign my statement there will be pictures? And that's when I said, 'You have the opportunity to tear me apart in court,' and that's when he said, 'I can tear you apart right now.' "
    Roberts said she told Williams she'd call police and hung up.
    "That did not occur," Williams said. "Never. My dealings were straightforward with her. She got upset about the pictures and totally shut down."
    Who won that round the attorney or the stripper?

    GUNSHY posted:
    I remember there were allot of av supporters here that had the conjecture that the white players hired black strippers specifically because they liked demeaning black women and thought they could get away with raping a black stripper. Her statement kind of blows that out of the water, huh?
    Being one of those "av supporters" you are mentioning about, I never thought this was a rape planned so much in advance. Considering the case involves race it was a valid question to ask if they asked for a black dancer or not at the time? It is good this point is cleared. But from the same quote that you have wrote it is evident that the tension rose because of the race of the dancers. Additionally, It is interesting that players lied to dancers to convince them to perform, saying it is a baseball and track team not lacrosse. They were trying to make dancers believe that there was a diverse group of people inside not just white players.
    She was initially told that the boys inside were members of the Duke track and baseball teams--she later learned that they played lacrosse.


    Re: Second Duke Lacrosse Dancer Talks to Vanity Fa (none / 0) (#33)
    by Jlvngstn on Wed Jun 07, 2006 at 09:46:49 AM EST
    you are right, someone get her an Oxford scholarship. What is really significant is this:
    When Williams asked whether she thought a rape occurred that night, Roberts said no. When Williams asked her to give a sworn statement, Roberts said she would sleep on it.
    Roberts said "no". Is it stupid to not speak your conscience? Or is it stupid to try and get a book deal because you were the "other stripper" that night. Being that no book deal has arrived yet, I will leave that up to the people taking calls from telemarketers.

    Bob in Pacifica posted:
    Hey, maybe you were talking in jest when you were insulting me. Ha ha ha.
    Did you take my opinion that you couldn't go any lower as an insult? You are clearly comfortable operating at that level. I couldn't imagine you would view it as such.

    Jlvngstn posted:
    Roberts said "no". Is it stupid to not speak your conscience? Or is it stupid to try and get a book deal because you were the "other stripper" that night. Being that no book deal has arrived yet, I will leave that up to the people taking calls from telemarketers.
    Do we know what was in the statement Butch was pressuring her to sign? Do we know that she tried to get a book deal?

    Re: Second Duke Lacrosse Dancer Talks to Vanity Fa (none / 0) (#36)
    by azbballfan on Wed Jun 07, 2006 at 10:13:47 AM EST
    imho:
    In my opinion you, Bob, couldn't go lower than you all ready have.
    Bob seems to have woken up on the wrong side of the bed today. And wumhenry sure seems to be the wrong kind of incite-ful. Sharon wrote:
    imho: the defense was adamant, and I think it is a telling point, that the "sample" was NOT under the nail. Life or death struggle (according to the search warrant affadavit) and all the DNA that can be found is on one nail?
    I think Sharon is referring to the press conference the defense team called to discuss the second round of DNA evidence. The press conference was called 2 days after the evidence was leaked. At the time of the leak, Cheshire was quoted as questioning the source of the leak - asking if the DA's office could have leaked the information. Then 2 days later at the press conference, the press started hounding Cheshire on the source of the leak - Cheshire looked like a deer in the headlights - he wouldn't say who was the source but when asked directly if it was Nifong, he said he it wasn't. He knew he was caught and couldn't lie. Then when asked about the DNA evidence on the nail, he started blasting the press for saying it came from skin under the nail - stating emphatically that he never said it came from skin under the nail and the press didn't have a copy of the report, so they couldn't report those details. When asked if he would give the press a redacted version of the report, he said he'd consider it (but didn't).

    Hicht posted:
    Additionally, It is interesting that players lied to dancers to convince them to perform, saying it is a baseball and track team not lacrosse. They were trying to make dancers believe that there was a diverse group of people inside not just white players.
    How do you know that? It seems pretty likely to me that the team (which had received warnings about their conduct in the past) was simply trying to keep its identity a secret while hosting a party the Duke administration would obviously not approve of.

    People lie all the time about their true identity when involved with strip shows. On both sides. Does anyone think the mothers of strippers all named their daughters "Sugar", "Candy" or whatever? It means nothing.

    noname posted:
    How do you know that? It seems pretty likely to me that the team (which had received warnings about their conduct in the past) was simply trying to keep its identity a secret while hosting a party the Duke administration would obviously not approve of.
    By lying to a stripper? How could Duke Admin hear that from a stripper? If they were so concerned about their troubled past, would they really host that party in that house where three Lacrosse captains living? I don't think it seems any likely.

    IMHO quoted ABC:
    Chesire conceded Friday that the results show that genetic material from beneath a plastic fingernail recovered from a garbage can at the scene of the alleged crime has "some characteristics'' of "one or two'' players' DNA, but that none of the tests show any conclusive matches.
    In today's Herald Sun, an article quotes court papers filed:
    In addition, DNA Security discovered tissue "consistent" with Evans' genetic structure on a fake acrylic fingernail retrieved from a trashcan at the Buchanan Boulevard house. (emphasis mine)
    I think that "on" doesn't necessarily mean "on the top" of the fingernail, but it also doesn't explicitly say "underneath." Until someone releases the actual report where the sample was lifted from the nail, we will just have to agree to disagree (I know, party pooper).

    Re: Second Duke Lacrosse Dancer Talks to Vanity Fa (none / 0) (#41)
    by wumhenry on Wed Jun 07, 2006 at 10:59:02 AM EST
    So, now you are comparing a prostitute being raped to someone being forced to "give it away for free?"
    Not comparing, *equating*. Raping a prostitute means forcing her to do something for free that she'd be perfectly willing to do for money -- and not very much money at that, in the case in question.

    mik posted:
    I think that "on" doesn't necessarily mean "on the top" of the fingernail, but it also doesn't explicitly say "underneath." Until someone releases the actual report where the sample was lifted from the nail, we will just have to agree to disagree (I know, party pooper).
    I haven't seen a quote by Cheshire that says the DNA wasn't under the nail, though he may have said it. I read a newspaper report that says he made the claim that the under the nail report was incorrect. I'm still looking for what he did say about the location of the fingernail DNA.

    Re: Second Duke Lacrosse Dancer Talks to Vanity Fa (none / 0) (#43)
    by wumhenry on Wed Jun 07, 2006 at 11:17:55 AM EST
    Additionally, It is interesting that players lied to dancers to convince them to perform, saying it is a baseball and track team not lacrosse. They were trying to make dancers believe that there was a diverse group of people inside not just white players.
    Your logic escapes me. Why would the players have supposed, when they made the call, that a pair of professional strippers, one Hispanic and one white, would refuse to perform for a group unless it included more than one black guy? (There was one black guy on the lacrosse team.)

    Re: Second Duke Lacrosse Dancer Talks to Vanity Fa (none / 0) (#44)
    by wumhenry on Wed Jun 07, 2006 at 11:27:31 AM EST
    Cheshire looked like a deer in the headlights
    According to azbballfan. If you trust azbballfan to present an unbiassed report of anything said or done by anybody in connection with this case, there's a bridge over the East River I'd like to sell you. (Yeah, it's ad hominem, but *they* started it!)

    wumhenry said:
    Your logic escapes me. Why would the players have supposed, when they made the call, that a pair of professional strippers, one Hispanic and one white, would refuse to perform for a group unless it included more than one black guy? (There was one black guy on the lacrosse team.)
    Indeed. And according to the photos on the site of the Duke baseball team, the team has NO black players. So how exactly would this (obvious, and unsurprising, under the circumstances) lie of the person who hosted the party have had anything to do with race? Would strippers be more likely to appear before a team with no black players (baseball) than with one black player (lacrosse)? It seems sometimes that those intent on defending Nifong's view of events have to engage in the most tortured applications of logic to fit contradictory facts into their perspective. That sort of thing is usually done by the defense in high-profile trials, not the prosecution.

    Re: Second Duke Lacrosse Dancer Talks to Vanity Fa (none / 0) (#46)
    by Jlvngstn on Wed Jun 07, 2006 at 11:32:46 AM EST
    So no argument on the conscience front, but as to the profit? Perhaps not a book deal but she did say "i am involved in the biggest story of the day and I think I should try and capitalize on it" or words to that effect. So principle over profit it sounds like to me. Funny how self-righteous you are about the men and conveniently ignore that. Then again, she is not stupid, merely a capitalist, correct?

    Additionally, It is interesting that players lied to dancers to convince them to perform, saying it is a baseball and track team not lacrosse. They were trying to make dancers believe that there was a diverse group of people inside not just white players.
    Last Friday night, at a bar during a bachelor party weekend, several of the 40-something, single, looking-for-love woman that our group of guys were talking to seemed mighty interested in getting to know the one guy specifically of our group who was hanging in the background - he was the correct (middle) age, no wedding band, good looking, well-dressed, looked successful, etc. Two of the girls said "he looks familiar." We said "well he should, he's Mit Romney, Gov of MA" and referred to him as "Governor" for the rest of the night. Why? Because we were drinking, it was funny, and the girls had no business knowing his real name or anything about him unless he wanted them to. My bet is that there was nothing nefarious about some the on the lacrosse team telling some sketchy strippers "We're baseball players. Oh, and track guys. Yeah, that's the ticket." (obviously not a real quote) Especially funny if you know guys on the baseball and track teams and are spoofing to be them while engaged in something that you might not especially want to be identified with later...like hiring strippers...

    Re: Second Duke Lacrosse Dancer Talks to Vanity Fa (none / 0) (#48)
    by azbballfan on Wed Jun 07, 2006 at 11:53:58 AM EST
    wumhenry:
    Not comparing, *equating*. Raping a prostitute means forcing her to do something for free that she'd be perfectly willing to do for money -- and not very much money at that, in the case in question.
    Some use ad hominems to describe others, some just let the words of others speak for their emotional intelligence. Shortly after the story ran, there was a story run with Durham strippers interviewed. They wondered how the lacrosse team was able to arrange the party because the local agencies had rules against dancers working for small groups of college boys - individiual teams and fraternities in particular, because of past incidents. The agency was quoted that when the boys called, they claimed to represent multiple teams and that there would be 'at least' 40 attendees. Apparently the number was closer to 15-20.

    Re: Second Duke Lacrosse Dancer Talks to Vanity Fa (none / 0) (#49)
    by Jo on Wed Jun 07, 2006 at 12:14:14 PM EST
    Raping a prostitute means forcing her to do something for free that she'd be perfectly willing to do for money ...
    If she was forced, then it is rape. If she had sex willingly but did not get paid, I don't think it's rape. If you take a ride in a taxi and run out without paying, is it carjacking?

    Re: Second Duke Lacrosse Dancer Talks to Vanity Fa (none / 0) (#50)
    by azbballfan on Wed Jun 07, 2006 at 12:35:23 PM EST
    Jo wrote:
    If she was forced, then it is rape. If she had sex willingly but did not get paid, I don't think it's rape. If you take a ride in a taxi and run out without paying, is it carjacking?
    I agree with you in principle. However if she had sex with Seligmann, Evans and Finnerty and they tried to stiff her (no pun intended), then they are just about the dumbest college atheletes ever. It'll be interesting if the case winds it's way down that path.

    From the Vanity Fair article:
    The two women chatted for a bit behind the house and had "a regular, normal conversation, nothing that set off any alarm bells in my head. We talked. We joked a little bit," Roberts says. "I told her I was new to this and didn't really know what I was doing. [The AV] told me that she danced at a club and was a little more experienced.
    I thought we were under the impression that the AV hadn't stripped before? Or was it that she'd never stripped for a private party before? Or never for Bunny Hole before?

    Re: Second Duke Lacrosse Dancer Talks to Vanity Fa (none / 0) (#52)
    by cpinva on Wed Jun 07, 2006 at 02:11:04 PM EST
    I wouldn't underestimate Kim or the accuser. If they were a couple of ignorant skank 'Ho's, this would have been over a long time ago.
    IMHO, interesting turn of phrase, one i wouldn't have thought of. coming from someone as obviously politically correct as you, i am deeply shocked and offended! (snark warning!) not being ignorant, being manipulative and being reasonably intelligent are not, by definition, mutually inclusive attributes. yep, ms. roberts is such a bright star, she just can't seem to talk enough, as long as she thinks it will benefit her economically in the long run. i didn't notice whether or not she was compensated by vanity fair for the interview. she has, however, stated on multiple occasions her desire to financially profit from this episode. perhaps, when all is said and done, a consulting deal with abc for a "movie of the week" gig? at this point, were i a defense atty., i would be salivating at the prospect of cross on ms. roberts, should DA nifong actually be foolish enough to call her as a witness. why he would is a mystery, since all she can do is place the AV & the accused in the house. she's already admitted she saw nothing nefarious occur, and that she doesn't think it did. that, and the total absence of any compelling forensic evidence, make this a case begging for dismissal.

    Hicht posted:
    By lying to a stripper? How could Duke Admin hear that from a stripper?
    This is a college town and these guys were on a nationally ranked team with a relatively loyal following. Word gets around college towns (even in townie circles), and it can easily start with, "Who did you dance for last night?" "The lacrosse team." The point is, if they were trying to keep it a secret, why wouldn't they lie to her. Hicht posted:
    If they were so concerned about their troubled past, would they really host that party in that house where three Lacrosse captains living?
    What were their other options? In order to have the party, they had to host it somewhere. Maybe this was the safest option they had (they had certainly gotten away with other parties there), and therefor a risk they were wiling to take.

    Re: Second Duke Lacrosse Dancer Talks to Vanity Fa (none / 0) (#54)
    by wumhenry on Wed Jun 07, 2006 at 02:40:11 PM EST
    Posted by azbballfan June 7, 2006 12:53 PM wumhenry: [quote]Not comparing, *equating*. Raping a prostitute means forcing her to do something for free that she'd be perfectly willing to do for money -- and not very much money at that, in the case in question.[unquote] Some use ad hominems to describe others, some just let the words of others speak for their emotional intelligence.
    More precisely, if you're referring to your own tactic, you're relying on ad hominem innuendo in lieu of rebuttal on the merits. The favorite dodge of hack polemicists when at a loss for an argument.

    IMHO likes to think of things in terms of rounds, like a boxing match. She asks: Who won that round the attorney or the stripper? My guess is that Butch Williams will be paid by his clients. Roberts may very well go to prison when she can't help Nifong. Who won that round, the media or Roberts' middle finger? Maybe the judges haven't given their decision quite yet.

    Re: Second Duke Lacrosse Dancer Talks to Vanity Fa (none / 0) (#56)
    by wumhenry on Wed Jun 07, 2006 at 02:56:12 PM EST
    if she had sex with Seligmann, Evans and Finnerty and they tried to stiff her (no pun intended), then they are just about the dumbest college atheletes ever. It'll be interesting if the case winds it's way down that path.
    Could've happened, but there's not a scrap of reported evidence to support that conjecture. On the other hand, there's a good deal of evidence that the AV and/or Roberts stiffed the players by taking $800 to perform for two hours and then quitting afer dancing for only a few minutes. Which suggests a plausible self-interested motive for the rape accusation: i.e., to serve as an excuse for the early departure should the players complain about it to the ladies' employer.

    wumhenry, Just tell IMHO that whatever you said that offended her was in jest. As long as IMHO is laughing, it's cool. After all, we're all nothing but a couple of ignorant skank 'Ho's here.

    Jo asked, in honing the difference between raping a prostitute and a prostitute not getting paid: If you take a ride in a taxi and run out without paying, is it carjacking? But what if on an audition at a strip club you steal a taxicab and try to run over a cop? Is that attempted murder? Apparently not in the wacky world of North Carolina.

    But, az, you're right. My back's been a little out of whack. Makes me a little cranky when I don't take my morning hike.

    Re: Second Duke Lacrosse Dancer Talks to Vanity Fa (none / 0) (#60)
    by wumhenry on Wed Jun 07, 2006 at 03:08:10 PM EST
    Better still, to *pre-empt* the players from complaining to the employer.

    Jlvngstn posted:
    So principle over profit it sounds like to me. Funny how self-righteous you are about the men and conveniently ignore that.
    What is self-righteous about asking you if what you posted was correct? Do we know what was in the statement Butch was pressuring her to sign? No. Do we know that she tried to get a book deal? No.

    Re: Second Duke Lacrosse Dancer Talks to Vanity Fa (none / 0) (#62)
    by wumhenry on Wed Jun 07, 2006 at 03:15:40 PM EST
    In response to my comment that to rape a prostitute is to force her to do something for free that she'd be perfectly willing to do for money, Jo wrote:
    If she was forced, then it is rape. If she had sex willingly but did not get paid, I don't think it's rape.
    You're right; in the second case it's merely fraud, but what you're saying does not refute what I said.

    Re: Second Duke Lacrosse Dancer Talks to Vanity Fa (none / 0) (#63)
    by azbballfan on Wed Jun 07, 2006 at 03:16:23 PM EST
    Bob, Sorry to hear about your back - I try to get a hike in 5 days a week. It's a great way to clear the mind. When my back twists up, I have to find flatter paths. Back to stream of consciousness writing!

    at this point, were i a defense atty., i would be salivating at the prospect of cross on ms. roberts, should DA nifong actually be foolish enough to call her as a witness. why he would is a mystery, since all she can do is place the AV & the accused in the house. she's already admitted she saw nothing nefarious occur, and that she doesn't think it did.
    The defense wanted Kim in their corner so bad. Butch blew it. She can provide the motive and the opportunity.

    Re: Second Duke Lacrosse Dancer Talks to Vanity Fa (none / 0) (#65)
    by wumhenry on Wed Jun 07, 2006 at 03:20:38 PM EST
    Do we know what was in the statement Butch was pressuring her to sign? No.
    Do we know that her account of interaction with defense lawyers is accurate? No.

    Jo posted:
    If she was forced, then it is rape. If she had sex willingly but did not get paid, I don't think it's rape. If you take a ride in a taxi and run out without paying, is it carjacking?
    I agree Jo, assuming she was willing during the sex acts, but that is not what anyone here says happened.

    Re: Second Duke Lacrosse Dancer Talks to Vanity Fa (none / 0) (#67)
    by azbballfan on Wed Jun 07, 2006 at 03:27:29 PM EST
    wum
    More precisely, if you're referring to your own tactic, you're relying on ad hominem innuendo in lieu of rebuttal on the merits. The favorite dodge of hack polemicists when at a loss for an argument.
    Ad hominum innuendo requires you to have presented an argument in the first place, rather than sophist attacks to the AV's rights. Your subsequent direct personal attacks at me however do qualify as ad hominem attacks. Changing tone from one post to the other has a muting effect on one's argument.

    It seems that Kim's Vanity Fair comments fit the Defense's time-line. They seem to line-up perfectly with the time-line from Johnsville News. This would also indicate that the AV must have quickly consumed half of her drink and all of Kim's. Johnsville timeline In particular, Kim says that she had to wait 30 minutes and that she then spoke with the AV for a few minutes before entering the house. This also coincides with the interview given by "Brian," who stated that he had trouble finding the address - and that the gig might be cancelled because of their tardiness. Finally, it is information that is consistent with the time-stamps on the photos. Per the Johnsville News: 11:15 p.m., Kim Roberts, exotic dancing partner of the accuser arrives at the party. She drove herself. 11:30 p.m., Bissey, after being out for a while, returns to his apartment. He sees approximately 30 people enter the house. Several young men are gathered near the back door of 610 N. Buchanan. Team captains have told the police that 41 of the 47 Duke lacrosse players attended the party. The team captains left Reade Seligmann off the list they gave to the police although he had been photographed watching the dancers. sometime between 11:30 p.m. and 11:45 p.m., The accuser is dropped off at the party house. She was wearing a negligee and shiny white strappy high heels. Brian Taylor and his passenger, the accuser, were flagged down by a man outside 610 N. Buchanan Blvd. awaiting their arrival. "On our way there, she got two calls on her cell phone saying if you don't come soon, it's going to get canceled," Taylor said. The were late, because Taylor had difficulty finding the address. 11:50 p.m., Bissey, on his porch, notices two women walk to the back of the house, where a man greets them. Two young women, one of them dressed in a short skirt and high heels, and the other woman was dressed a little more conservatively spoke with the gentleman outside of this door here briefly, and then at this point, all of the young men were inside. They spoke amongst themselves for about five minutes or so and then entered the house. 11:55 p.m., Bissey sees the two women go into the house (Accuser & Kim Roberts). After the two women had entered the house Bissey went inside to take a shower. Midnight (photo time stamp) The dancer is sprawled on her stomach on the floor, as a second dancer stands over her. Students are watching the show but not grabbing or attempting to touch the women. Bruises are clearly visible on the legs and thighs of the alleged victim. As far as the "pissing off the back porch" comment is concerned - this supports the notion that the bathrooms were pretty busy - as one can imagine with almost 50 people drinking beer for some period of time and only two bathrooms. Further, in my experience, most guys don't lock the bathroom door in a single-gender setting just to take a "pee." In most cases, they would simply leave the door slightly ajar - so someone would know the bathroom was occupied - but would be ready-for-action shortly. In public bathrooms the urinals are always "open" and I've never locked a bathroom stall door simply to urinate. Thus, the point is...someone would have noticed if there was a 30-minute struggle in a locked bathroom.

    wumhenry posted:
    Do we know that her account of interaction with defense lawyers is accurate? No.
    Jlvngstn was using Kim's reluctance to sign the statement as an example of her not speaking her conscience:
    Roberts said "no". Is it stupid to not speak your conscience?
    We don't know what she refused to sign. It may be an example of her unwillingness to lie for the defense. We don't know.

    Bob in Pacifica posted:
    wumhenry, Just tell IMHO that whatever you said that offended her was in jest. As long as IMHO is laughing, it's cool.
    Bob, did the expression "ignorant skank 'ho" offend you? Bob in Pacifica posted:
    After all, we're all nothing but a couple of ignorant skank 'Ho's here.
    If you read my post you'll recall I didn't call anyone an ignorant skank 'ho. I said Kim and the accuser were not ignorant skank 'ho's.

    The Vanity Fair July issue is on newsstands now in New York and LA. If a TL blogger in one of those two cities would be so kind as to buy one and report its contents...

    ABRAMS: All right. My subjective opinion of looking at these pictures is they are two-buck naked women performing sexual acts on one another in front of a lot of different people. Now again...
    What was the point of this party?

    From an WRAL posting: Second Set Of Duke Lacrosse DNA Tests Cost Nearly $23,000
    District Attorney Mike Nifong sent dozens of samples to DNA Security of Burlington at the suggestion of the State Bureau of Investigation, whose testing failed to link any lacrosse player to an exotic dancer who alleges she was raped at a March 13 lacrosse team party.


    Re: Second Duke Lacrosse Dancer Talks to Vanity Fa (none / 0) (#74)
    by Lora on Thu Jun 08, 2006 at 01:04:10 AM EST
    wumhenry posted:
    I neither said nor implied that raping a prostitute is OK. Rather, I asked how likely it is that a prostitute would be "reduced to hysteria by shame and guilt" (quoting someone else's conjectural description of the AV's state of mind)if dicked without her consent. Someone who frequently and routinely has sex for money with any stranger who'll pay her price might be very frustrated and angry if someone forced her to submit to do it for nothing, but it's far from clear to me why she'd feel either ashamed or guilty, let alone be reduced to hysteria by those emotions. So far no one here, including the person who took it for granted that the AV, who is a prostitute, would react in that way if forced to "give it away for free," has deigned to answer the question, but I still think it's a good one.
    All right, let me give it a try. It's about choice, consent, power, and control. We can argue till the day is long about how much actual choice and consent prostitutes really have...but let's assume for the sake of argument that the AV, if she is acting as a prostitute during her escorts, freely consents to sex for money. In this case, the money is irrelevant. What is relevant is that she gave her consent. It was her choice to have sex. People have sex for many reasons: recreation, attention, love, intimacy, money, pleasure, etc. A person could have sex eight times in two days willingly for any reason at all, but if the ninth time was forced, and the person was violated, pinned, beaten, hurt inside, terrified she might be killed, humiliated, had her sense of safety and control completely taken away from her... Can you get a sense that that person might feel hysterical and traumatized? The shame and guilt factor in if the person blames herself, or if she feels humiliated. Both reactions are very common. The money doesn't matter. What matters is being forced, terrorized and hurt in an intimate activity you normally perform willingly at your discretion and choice.

    Motion protests DA's bid for data
    Nifong issued two subpoenas May 31. The first asked Duke University for home addresses for 47 lacrosse players and two other students; the second asked for identity card data that could track where the 49 students were in the hours before and after the alleged rape.


    Sounds like Nifong is still on a fishing expedition trying to determine who was present at the party. Why wasn't this done BEFORE indictments were handed down?

    Lora, That was an excellent post, but if wumhenry can not imagine that someone being forced to have oral, vaginal and anal sex with three people while being restrained and strangled could be traumatized and humilated by such an assault simply because they have had sex for money, why bother? wumhenry's comment is not about a lack of understanding, it is about contempt.

    mik posted:
    Sounds like Nifong is still on a fishing expedition trying to determine who was present at the party. Why wasn't this done BEFORE indictments were handed down?
    Maybe he's trying to identify the four "agitated" players that got in Mostafa's cab around 12:50 a.m.

    Re: Second Duke Lacrosse Dancer Talks to Vanity Fa (none / 0) (#79)
    by weezie on Thu Jun 08, 2006 at 06:08:45 AM EST
    Wow, I'm no rocket scientist (yes, I hear the resounding applause) but is Nifong really that far behind the curve on requesting the team ID card info this late in the process? So his idiocy is the reason this case may drag on to spring '07 and not just his desire to torture the three indicted players. Lawyers, please, is this standard operating procedure for prosecutors? And would Duke have to come across with the info?

    IMHO wrote:
    Maybe he's trying to identify the four "agitated" players that got in Mostafa's cab around 12:50 a.m.
    No, there are other ways to get that information. Nifong knows Mostafa has the info on the cell phone number that made the call for the pick up. He needs to go through that avenue first, not just a blanket request for personal information from essentially the entire lacrosse team. Their information is priviledged unless Nifong can identify which ones he needs information from. I recognize his request for DNA was legitimate. The SANE nurse found male genetic material in the victim, and he wanted the most expediant way to identify the perpetrator. He claimed in his petition to compel the team to provide DNA samples that it would indicate the guilty AND exhonorate the innocent. Unfortunately for Nifong, it didn't belong to anyone on the team.

    Re: Second Duke Lacrosse Dancer Talks to Vanity Fa (none / 0) (#81)
    by Jlvngstn on Thu Jun 08, 2006 at 06:24:46 AM EST
    IMHO - Are you implying you don't know about her email, or are you obfuscating?
    Hi! My name is Kim and I am involved in the Duke Lacrosse scandal. Although I am no celebrity and just an average citizen, I've found myself in the center of one of the biggest stories in the country. I'm worried about letting this opportunity pass me by without making the best of it and was wondering if you had any advice as to how to spin this to my advantage. I am determined not to let any negative publicity about my life overtake me. I'm so confused as to who to talk to for relevant advice and I hope that you can return my e-mail. If you cannot help, do you know of any names and numbers I can call?


    I must come to wumhenry's defense here. Sure, he could have worded it to be more palatable, although my guess is that some of the people who like to say "skanky ho" when it suits them would still roil with any trace of indelicate phrasing by others. The underlying question continues to be avoided by the defenders of the AV's version of reality. Was this woman so traumatized by being gangraped that she could not talk coherently with a police officer about it? Was her erratic behavior in the hours after she left the party the result of being traumatized by rape, or were they the result of being drunk and not wanting to go to the drunk tank? The chorus of defenders of the AV's version of reality range from admitting that she was high (but maybe drugged) to that she was sober and all of her bizarre behavior was due to her state of shock and that all of her contradictory statements weren't contradictory at all. I would advise wumhenry not to expect much headway in convincing the DOTAVsVORs. A woman who works in the game knows brutalization. It's a lousy career choice for women who haven't been dealt a very good hand in life. To pretend that a woman who's been doing strip jobs and one-on-ones and has two "drivers" is not familiar with the dynamics of sexual coercion is pretty naive, a naivete that they don't share with their presumptive martyr in this drama. The AV didn't just get off the bus. That night she was keening this way and that way, not functioning on all neurons, trying to figure a way out of the maze she put herself in by getting so drunk. This was not unlike trying to get away in a stolen taxicab. She was behind the wheel. With a moral certainty her defenders are incapable of understanding she aims the car. It's everyone else's responsibility to get out of the way.

    Re: Second Duke Lacrosse Dancer Talks to Vanity Fa (none / 0) (#83)
    by Jlvngstn on Thu Jun 08, 2006 at 06:27:14 AM EST
    When asked if Kim thought there was a rape that night, she said "no". Not, I don't know. Not, It wouldn't surprise me with the way they were acting. Not, I did not see the other woman for at least 20 minutes. It was, "no". When you scream "I AM RIGHT" it does not make you right, only load and obnoxious......

    Another question that I ponder here: It's been suggested before that "Little Girl" Roberts may have stolen the AV's share of the $800 while the AV was passed out in the car. I am curious as to how the money is broken down in the business. How much, if any, of the AV's $400 is owed to Bunny Hole? To the driver? If we are looking for motives for the AV making up such a story we could have: 1. To divert her parents' inevitable discovery that their daughter was, as IMHO likes to say, a "skanky ho." 2. To avoid being incarcerated, either in a lockdown for public intoxication or in some other public institution for substance abusers. 3. To avoid the consequences of not bringing back money owed to Bunny Hole. Once the AV declared that she had been raped, she was, shall we say it, in the driver's seat.

    Re: Second Duke Lacrosse Dancer Talks to Vanity Fa (none / 0) (#85)
    by Jlvngstn on Thu Jun 08, 2006 at 06:38:40 AM EST
    "Why shouldn't I profit from it?" she asked. "I didn't ask to be in this position ... I would like to feed my daughter."
    IMHO - I am sure "profit" in this instance means that she will be booked for only high rollers strip parties, making like $500 per show instead of $400.

    Bob wrote:
    I am curious as to how the money is broken down in the business. How much, if any, of the AV's $400 is owed to Bunny Hole? To the driver?
    From the Washington Post:
    She was also moonlighting with an escort service. Nearly two dozen such services are listed in the Raleigh-Durham-Chapel Hill yellow pages. One owner who agreed to be interviewed but identified only by her first name, Jamie, operates escort services under six names. She employs three to four women. Escort fees are $160 an hour -- $100 for the escort and $60 as Jamie's take. Occasionally, a customer will request a dancer for a party, a complication because the job requires a bouncer for safety. "We can't send one girl for five guys," Jamie said. But often no bouncer is available, and the escort needs the cash. "Everybody loves money," Jamie said.


    Here's an interesting quote from the story about Nifong's fishing expedition: Nifong could not be reached for comment Wednesday.

    Re: Second Duke Lacrosse Dancer Talks to Vanity Fa (none / 0) (#88)
    by Jlvngstn on Thu Jun 08, 2006 at 06:45:21 AM EST
    Roberts' attorney called the e-mail regrettable.
    Hmmm. An embezzler sends a note to a PR firm looking to profit from a crime not only did she not witness but in response to a question as whether the crime even happened she said "no". An embezzler. : to appropriate (as property entrusted to one's care) fraudulently to one's own use Notice the pattern????