ACLU-IN Challenges Banishment Ordinance
by TChris
The ACLU of Indiana filed suit this week to block an Indianapolis ordinance that would prevent former sex offenders from traveling, living, or working within 1,000 feet of a park, playground, swimming pool, recreation center, sports field, or other designated areas where children might congregate.
Calling the ordinance passed in mid-May unconstitutionally vague, the group said it would make law-abiding citizens unwitting violators of the ordinance and hinder their ability to work, vote and worship.
The ordinance applies retroactively, punishing individuals who have long and untroubled residences near a prohibited area (nearly anyplace within city boundaries). The City makes an exception for ex-offenders who are accompanied by another adult, but people who have paid their debt to society shouldn't need an escort to travel to work or to exercise their right to vote.
Former offenders can violate the law unknowingly by driving down a street that passes within 999 feet of a park they can't see. While proponents of the law argue that the City won't enforce the law unreasonably, nothing would prevent an overzealous officer from arresting a former offender who strayed into the forbidden zone -- straying that would be virtually impossible to avoid.
The ordinance amounts to banishment. TalkLeft's opposition to banishment laws is explained here and here.
Strangely, Focus on the Family has no sympathy for the ACLU's argument that the ordinance would prohibit ex-offenders from attending church. One might expect Focus on the Family to be delighted when an ex-offender seeks strength and moral guidance in a house of worship. Not so. If the ACLU is against something, Focus on the Family is for it.
"The ACLU suddenly screaming about people's ability to get to church," [Rich Ackerman, president of the Pro-Family Law Center] said, "sounds a little suspect, to say the least."
Actually, the ACLU has a long history of supporting religious freedom (recent examples here and here). Its equal interest in enforcing the Establishment Clause might irk Focus on the Family, but it should applaud the ACLU's concern in assuring that offenders seeking redemption aren't arrested on their way to church. After all, evangelists contend that faith based programs deserve taxpayer support because they're effective in preventing recidivism.
| < Aspen: NORML Comes to Town | Wen Ho Lee Settles Suit > |





