Following Up When the Police Shoot an Unarmed Suspect
by TChris
As TalkLeft reported here, a videotape captured a police officer's shooting of Elio Carrion as the unarmed Carrion, an Air Force policeman who recently returned from Iraq, tried to comply with the officer's orders. Carl Jeffers writes about the follow up -- or lack thereof -- in cases like Carrion's.
The Carrion family is outraged that Officer Webb himself has not been arrested and criminally prosecuted for his actions. As for the San Bernardino County Sheriff's department, they have accorded Webb the same prerogatives that are always accorded police officers in these situations - and that's the first problem I have with this event. I never agree with any of these prerogatives. Officer Webb has been placed on paid administrative leave, and he was given the standard 48 to sometimes 72 hours to relax, collect himself, and get his story together for his written report. And when there is a video tape involved, the Department spokesmen and top officers immediately hold press conferences to assert that the officer was acting fully within Department guidelines, was responding to an immediate threat, and then warn that what we see on the tape doesn't show the entire picture and cannot be relied on to portray the actual events. BULL! ...
Secondly, and this is the area where I have always been the most outraged - I do not believe that officers should get two to three days to get their story together - and this is particularly relevant when, as often is the case, several officers are involved. In normal criminal cases, even in car accidents, all parties and the authorities want the statements and facts recounted as quickly as possible, not as delayed as possible. Why? Because memory recall is best relied upon the closer it is to the actual event. Unless it is an opportunity for several participants to get together and coordinate their stories.
| < America for Sale | A Disastrous Idea > |





