home

Calling All Dems With a Spine to Filibuster Alito

Are the Democrats just going to lie down and take it like the men and women they are rather than those we elected them to be? The New York Times Thursday calls them "in need of a spine." I agree. (I said the same thing the other day about the way they were reacting to Karl Rove's comments, trying to one-up him on being in support of wiretaps, practically begging the Repubs to ask Congress to gut FISA and the 4th Amendment and saying they'd be only to happy to comply.)

Back to Alito and the Times, which notes:

[Alito's] elevation will come courtesy of a president whose grandiose vision of his own powers threatens to undermine the nation's basic philosophy of government -- and a Senate that seems eager to cooperate by rolling over and playing dead.

It is hard to imagine a moment when it would be more appropriate for senators to fight for a principle. Even a losing battle would draw the public's attention to the import of this nomination. ...A filibuster is a radical tool. It's easy to see why Democrats are frightened of it. But from our perspective, there are some things far more frightening. One of them is Samuel Alito on the Supreme Court.

The Seattle Post Intelligencer:

Judge Samuel Alito will soon get his lifetime appointment to the U.S. Supreme Court. Alito's history of extreme views on abortion and executive powers makes that nothing more than a regrettable political reality.

With the politics favoring President Bush's nominee, the U.S. Senate must send Alito forward with a forceful, respectful and unforgettable set of reminders about his constitutional responsibilities. Senators can underline the message with as many votes as possible against confirmation.

...Learned, honorable and experienced, Alito is still so far out of the mainstream that a Senate filibuster would be fully justified. But the power-drunk Republican threat to set a procedural precedent eliminating such filibusters forever argues for caution.

I'm not afraid of Frist's nuclear option. There is going to be a Republican or two who believes in continuing the time-honored traditions of the Senate more than payback. I think it's worth the risk.

It only takes one courageous democrat to start a filibuster. Maybe we can count on Sen. Dick Durbin.