home

Drug, Death and Indigent Defense Provisions in Patriot Act

The full text of the pending Patriot Act renewal legislation, along with the report from the Republicans on the Conference Committee, is available here. [link fixed.]The Table of Contents lists the following provisions specifically impacting Drug Policy.

  • Sec. 122. Prohibition of narco-terrorism.
  • Sec. 221. Elimination of procedures applicable only to certain Controlled Substances Act cases. (Death Penalty)
  • Sec. 410. Uniform procedures for criminal forfeiture.
  • TITLE VII--COMBAT METHAMPHETAMINE EPIDEMIC ACT OF 2005 (Sections
    701-756)

Also check out Section 201 which contains the``Terrorist Death Penalty Enhancement Act of 2005''. Sec. 222 adds a new section on indigent defense in death cases (which will now be under 18 USC 3599 in Title 28) instead of 21 USC 848 (q.) Hopefully, they didn't diminish funding.

Background on the use of the Patriot Act to fight the drug war is here. Much of this is the work of Congressman James Sensenbrenner who has become, in my constitutionally protected opinion, a national menace (read about his five years for passing a joint bill and "snitch or go to jail" bills.) As TChris wrote, it's time to Just Say No to Sensenbrenner.

< Alito and the Death Penalty | Bob Dylan to Host Radio Show on XM >
  • The Online Magazine with Liberal coverage of crime-related political and injustice news

  • Contribute To TalkLeft


  • Display: Sort:
    Re: Drug, Death and Indigent Defense Provisions in (none / 0) (#1)
    by Sailor on Sat Dec 17, 2005 at 01:06:59 PM EST
    Hey TL, what's your take on 603; 604? It appears to ciminalize protesting anyone under Secret Service protection ... whether the SS is there or not.

    I would love to see someone with a plain language version of this bill as it appears there is a lot of stuff added in conference that wasn't in the Senate version of the bill.

    Re: Drug, Death and Indigent Defense Provisions in (none / 0) (#3)
    by peacrevol on Sat Dec 17, 2005 at 01:07:00 PM EST
    I would love to see someone with a plain language version of this bill as it appears there is a lot of stuff added in conference that wasn't in the Senate version of the bill.
    I can think of two reasons why they write bills in this cross referencing, confusing language. A) to justify their jobs and/or B) to keep the general public from trying to understand what they are doing. (Probably some of both, but I suspect more B than A.) This is just like the original patriot act. They're trying to take away some of our rights in the name of 'national security'. More and increasing manditory minimums. Why are repubs so in love with manditory minimums? Dont they trust the judges? Oh wait...I can answer that myself. (obviously not) I dont like what I'm reading when I read this report b/c they're trying to take away rights in the name of 'security'. What ever happened to "give me liberty or give me death"? My forefathers put themselves in harms way in the name of liberty and freedom so that they and I would have the rights that this bill is trying to take away. They didnt trade any freedoms in the name of safety and nor should we.

    Re: Drug, Death and Indigent Defense Provisions in (none / 0) (#4)
    by scarshapedstar on Sat Dec 17, 2005 at 01:07:01 PM EST
    What ever happened to "give me liberty or give me death"?
    Pro-life, anti-liberty... now it all makes sense.