home

Time For Cheney to Come Clean, Part 2

by TChris

Echoing yesterday’s TalkLeft request for Dick Cheney to come clean, Nicholas Kristof today urges the vice president to “clear the air” by answering six questions in a televised press conference. The NY Times no longer provides free online access to Kristof’s columns, but the questions merit discussion, so they are reproduced (from the print edition) here (Truthout provides a free link here):

Did you ask Scooter Libby to undertake his inquiries about Ambassador Joseph Wilson? Mr. Libby made such a concerted push to get information, from both the State Department and the CIA, that I suspect that you prodded him. Is that right? If so, why?

Why did you independently ask the CIA for information about the Wilsons? The indictment states that on June 12, 2003, you advised Mr. Libby that you learned, apparently from the CIA, that Mr. Wilson’s wife, Valerie, worked in the agency. So did you ask George Tenet, then the director, about Mr. and Mrs. Wilson? Did you review the related documents that the CIA faxed to your office?

Did you know that Mrs. Wilson was a covert officer? The indictment states that you knew she worked in the CIA’s counterproliferation division. You would think that anyone as steeped in intelligence issues as you are would know that meant she worked in the Directorate of Operations and was perhaps a spook’s spook.

Did you advise Mr. Libby to leak information about Mrs. Wilson’s work in the CIA to journalists? Mr. Libby flew with you on Air Force Two on July 12, 2003, and according to the indictment, one of the issues Mr. Libby discussed onboard the plane (with you?) was how to deal with the media. Within hours, the indictment charges, Mr. Libby told two reporters that Mrs. Wilson worked in the agency.

When Mr. Libby made his statements in the inquiry — allegedly committing perjury — were you aware of what he was saying? Mr. Libby rode to work with you almost every morning, but this topic never came up?

Here’s the $64,000 question:

Was Mr. Libby fearful of disclosing something about your behavior in the summer of 2003? Mr. Libby is renowned for his caution, yet he is alleged to have suddenly embarked upon a high-risk campaign of leaks and lies. If he did do that, was it a misguided attempt to protect you? The alleged lies shielded you by indicating that the information you gave him about Mrs. Wilson instead came from reporters.

Would the truth have been so potentially damaging to your position that Mr. Libby chose perjury instead?

The answers to these questions could be (or less charitably, almost certainly would be) embarrassing to Cheney, but that’s no reason to withhold the truth from the public. Nor is is reasonable for an elected official to hide behind the excuse that his public statements would jeopardize the case against Libby if he spoke freely. That would only be true if Cheney’s public answers were at odds with answers he gave to Fitzgerald or his investigators. If Cheney told them the truth but decides to lie in a public statement, he could damage his credibility as a witness against Libby. If he tells the truth to the public, he does nothing that would interfere with, or harm, Libby’s prosecution.

So let’s hear it, Mr. Vice President. You aren’t a private citizen who can decide to keep quiet until subpoenaed to testify. You’re a public servant. You work for us, and we’re entitled to know what role you played in your office’s leak of Valerie Plame’s identity as a CIA employee.

< Libby and Perjury: Count Five of the Indictment | Matthew Cooper Speaks on Libby and Rove >
  • The Online Magazine with Liberal coverage of crime-related political and injustice news

  • Contribute To TalkLeft


  • Display: Sort:
    Re: Time For Cheney to Come Clean, Part 2 (none / 0) (#1)
    by profmarcus on Sat Dec 17, 2005 at 01:05:34 PM EST
    i'm glad kristof is being dogged about this... in times past, such a public outcry from a media outlet like the nyt would have created almost irresistible pressure for action... but, given past experience watching this administration merely look the other way while pretending they didn't hear you, i doubt seriously if it will have any effect... one of the biggest questions that needs to be asked and seriously discussed is how in the hell did we allow this administration to get in to office...? pogo's famous line applies - "we have met the enemy and he is us..."

    Re: Time For Cheney to Come Clean, Part 2 (none / 0) (#2)
    by mjvpi on Sat Dec 17, 2005 at 01:05:37 PM EST
    It's time for the Senate pre-war intell investigation part2! There are big political answers that are country needs that are outside of the scope of what Mr. Fitzgerald is supposed to do.

    Re: Time For Cheney to Come Clean, Part 2 (none / 0) (#3)
    by Tom Maguire on Sat Dec 17, 2005 at 01:05:37 PM EST
    For Charley, no, Kristof is not exactly the guy to blow the trumpet of truthtelling. As to Cheney coming clean - if he has a press conference and gets four-square behind Libby, will the reaction be: (a) good job clearing the air, Mr. Vice President, thanks for sticking up for Libby, who deserves the presumption of innocence and has been a hard-working public servant; (b) why is the VP putting the power of his bully pulpit behind an indicted sonn-to-be criminal, thereby distorting media coverage and making a fair trial impossible? or, (c) end the cover-up - make Cheney repeat that press conference in a sworn venue! My guess is that (b) or (c) are more likely. My advice to Cheney - tell Kristof that a precondition for a Cheney conference would be for the NY Times, and Kristof, to acknowledge their own problems with their coverage of this story. There is no reason for Cheney to think the press will cover this fairly, since they have been making a hash of this story for two years.