Conflicting Reports on Rove
The New York Times reports that Libby likely will be indicted but Rove will remain under investigation and Fitzgerald will extend the investigation. The Wall St. Journal (free link) has similar information.
The Washington Post reports Fitzgerald won't extend the investigation, and Rove still fears being indicted.
How can both be true? One possibility is that all indictments but Rove's were voted on and filed with the Court on Wednesday, and Fitzgerald agreed to wait until tomorrow to make a decision on Rove.
But I just don't see Fitzgerald extending this grand jury.
|< Report: Libby Seeking New Lawyer | Plame Grand Jury Out of Extensions >|