Specter: CJ Rehnquist Is a Judicial Activist
by TChris
Update: Attacks on the Supreme Court by politicians who disagree with the Court's rulings threaten the Court's independence, Justice Breyer said today. If Arlen Specter wants to use the Roberts' nomination to send the Court a message, it seems Justice Breyer is taking the opportunity to send a message on behalf of "seven or eight or nine members of the Supreme Court." The message, in essence: leave us alone.
*****
Original post:
It’s funny that a Republican senator would accuse conservative Supreme Court justices of judicial activism, but Arlen Specter, previewing some of the questions he intends to pose to John Roberts, seems to have done just that.
Sen. Arlen Specter, R-Pa., advised Roberts in a letter that he would question the nominee on his thoughts about the court's attitude toward Congress and on two cases in which the court limited Congress' lawmaking ability. … Specter called the limiting of Congress' authority "the hallmark agenda of the judicial activism of the Rehnquist Court."
The cases in question – United States v. Lopez and United States v. Morrison – concluded that legislation enacted pursuant to the Commerce Clause was so tangential to interstate commerce that Congress lacked the authority to create it. The majority in both 5-4 decisions: Rehnquist, O'Connor, Scalia, Kennedy, and Thomas.
Will Roberts assure Specter that he won’t be a disrespectful judicial activist like those rogue Supreme Court justices, Scalia, Thomas, and Rehnquist? Can Republicans even agree on a definition of judicial activism? Does the phrase simply refer to judges who actively discharge their responsibility to decide whether enacted legislation is constitutional?
| < The High Road | Another WorldCom Sentence > |





