home

From the Vanity Fair Article on Joseph Wilson

The Vanity Fair article on Joseph Wilson and Valerie Plame Wilson is available online here. It's worth re-reading yet again, not for anything new, but to put some of things we've all learned and confirmed in the past few weeks into sharper focus. A couple of paragraphs that stand out to me:

After Wilson returned to America, a C.I.A. reports officer visited him at home and later debriefed him. Since Wilson's trip had been made because of Cheney's office's request, he assumed that the vice president had received at least a phone call about his findings. "There would have been a very specific answer provided ... to the very specific question that he asked," Wilson says. (The vice president's office denies that Cheney heard back from the C.I.A. or knew about Wilson's trip until he read about it in the newspaper many months later. Tenet confirmed the trip was made on the C.I.A.'s "own initiative." )

By this point members of the intelligence community were complaining behind the scenes about pressure from the administration to find evidence of links between Saddam and international terrorism, and also between Saddam and weapons of mass destruction. According to an October 27, 2003, story by Seymour Hersh in The New Yorker, there seemed to be a tendency by Cheney's office, among others, to bypass the analysts and use raw intelligence given directly to the administration. There was also increased reliance on intelligence provided by Ahmad Chalabi, the charismatic head of the opposition Iraqi National Congress, from Iraqi defectors. .... The C.I.A. did not trust Chalabi or his men. Cheney and the Pentagon, on the other hand, stood firmly behind him.

Cheney and his chief of staff, Lewis Libby, visited the C.I.A. several times at Langley and told the staff to make more of an effort to find evidence of weapons of mass destruction in Iraq and to uncover Iraqi attempts to acquire nuclear capabilities. One of the people who objected most fervently to what he saw as "intimidation," according to one former C.I.A. case officer, was Alan Foley, then the head of the Weapons Intelligence, Non-Proliferation and Arms Control Center. He was Valerie Plame's boss. (Foley could not be reached for comment.)

[Note that the line at the beginning about Cheney's office making the request, refers not to Cheney requesting that Wilson per se make the trip, but that Cheney's office requested the CIA to send someone. We now know it was Valerie Plame's boss who asked Wilson to go. That sentence could have been more clearly stated.]

Anyway, the Vanity Fair article seems to jive in large part with what Larry Johnson, Vince Cannistraro and others have said.

One other part of interest concerns Novak. Did he lie to Wilson?

Wilson was caught off guard when around July 9 he received a phone call from Robert Novak, who, according to Wilson, said he'd been told by a C.I.A. source that Wilson's wife worked for the agency. "Can you confirm or deny?" Wilson recalls Novak as saying. "I need another source."

Wilson says he replied, "I'm not going to answer any questions about my wife." At this point, Wilson says, he and his wife thought the leak could be contained if no one picked it up.

When the Novak story ran, identifying not the C.I.A. as the source of the leak but "two senior administration officials," Wilson says, he called Novak and said, "When you asked for the confirmation you said a 'C.I.A. source.'" "I misspoke," Wilson says Novak replied. (Novak declined to comment.)

....In the last week of September, Novak modified his story. In an appearance on CNN's Crossfire, he said, "Nobody in the Bush administration called me to leak this," and also that, "according to a confidential source at the C.I.A., Mrs. Wilson was an analyst, not a spy, not a covert operative, and not in charge of undercover operatives."

Then there's this:

NBC's Andrea Mitchell called him that weekend, he says, and told him that sources at the White House were telling her, "The real story here is not the 16 words-the real story is Wilson and his wife." Next, Wilson got a call from a journalist whom he won't name-but who is widely thought to be Chris Matthews-who, according to Wilson, gushed, "I just got off the phone with Karl Rove. He says your wife is fair game. I gotta go." Click.

< Is Rove Now Implicating Judith Miller? | Question About Cheney and Wilson >
  • The Online Magazine with Liberal coverage of crime-related political and injustice news

  • Contribute To TalkLeft


  • Display: Sort:
    You commented below on today's Matt Cooper article. Beyond the fact that he made it clear that he had never heard anything about Valerie Wilson before his conversation with Rove, I thought it was interesting the way he seemed to suggest there might be something bogus about the Rove/Hadley email which was supposedly written just after Cooper's conversation with Rove. In the email Rove told Hadley that Cooper had called to talk about welfare reform and then segued into questions about the damage to Bush from Wilson's revelations. Cooper says he neither recalls nor do any of his notes indicate that he spoke to Rove about welfare reform in that call. He says, in fact, that he recalls specifically calling to discuss Wilson's article. He notes that early in the week he had left a phone message about a welfare reform story he was working on. I've seen folks say that there is no way on a system like the Whitehouse's to go back and create a CYA email, but Cooper seems to be implying that that is exactly what Rove may have done. In the process Rove may have reviewed his notes and conflated Cooper's early phone message into his CYA email.

    Let's connect a few dots.

    Alan Foley, head of WINPAC, was Valerie Wilson's boss. Frederick Fleitz, John Bolton's special assistant, was on loan from the CIA's WINPAC. He is quoted as telling the senate,

    I perform liaison functions for the agency and Mr. Bolton.
    In other words, he worked in both places at the same time.

    Just a coincidence, of course. Nothing more.

    There was also increased reliance on intelligence provided by Ahmad Chalabi...
    . Since he was such a paragon of reliable information (ahem!), why don't we just dismantle our intelligence agencies, and hire him. Think of the money we'll save! Oh, I forgot, he's not too good with other people's money. Maybe we'd better take a pass on that one.

    Talkleft, John Dean notes a case in discussing the leak of Valerie Plame; that of Jonathan Randel, a DEA analyst, who was indicted for the leaking of Lord Ashcroft's name, which was in a DEA file, in Feb. '02. Count 1 of his indictment alleged a violation of Title 18 US Code, sec.641. I just found it interesting.

    Re: From the Vanity Fair Article on Joseph Wilson (none / 0) (#4)
    by ppjakajim on Sat Dec 17, 2005 at 01:01:20 PM EST
    American Dreamer writes:
    Cooper says he neither recalls nor do any of his notes indicate that he spoke to Rove about welfare reform in that call. He says, in fact, that he recalls specifically calling to discuss Wilson's article.
    Of course he isn't going to remember calling Rove about welfare reform to set him up about Wilson's article. That would make him look bad. Re email - It can't. cheetah - He probably couldn't pass the strict guidelines for human agents as imposed by the Church Committee.

    Re: From the Vanity Fair Article on Joseph Wilson (none / 0) (#5)
    by Che's Lounge on Sat Dec 17, 2005 at 01:01:21 PM EST
    Implausable stupidity.

    Re: From the Vanity Fair Article on Joseph Wilson (none / 0) (#6)
    by Che's Lounge on Sat Dec 17, 2005 at 01:01:21 PM EST
    Re: Cheney and Rove.