home

Commission to Study U.S. Prison Conditions

A high-level commision has been appointed to study U.S. prison conditions. This is welcome news.

A high-level commission yesterday began a year-long examination of violence, sexual abuse, overcrowding and inhumane treatment in U.S. prisons, in an investigation provoked in part by reports of misconduct by U.S. corrections officers assigned to serve in military detention centers overseas.

The privately organized commission, which has attracted interest in its work from the Justice Department and key lawmakers, is headed by former attorney general Nicholas deB. Katzenbach and John J. Gibbons, a former federal appeals court judge. Its aim is to recommend prison reforms from local to federal levels after holding at least four public hearings around the country.

Why is it needed? Check out these stats:

  • More than 34,000 assaults were committed by prisoners against other inmates in a 12-month period covering parts of 1999 and 2000;
  • The number of prisoner assaults against staff in that period was 27 percent higher than the previous 12 months.
  • More than a million people were sexually assaulted in prisons over the past two decades.
  • Eleven inmates died in restraint chairs in the 1990s.
  • Corrections officers have reduced life expectancies and higher rates of alcoholism than other law enforcement officers.

There are no national mandatory prison standards in this country. Many prisons are run by private contractors. We know abuse is rampant, it's time to do something about it. This commission is a great start.

The 21-member commission includes psychiatrists, criminologists and law professors; a former U.S. attorney and Tennessee sheriff; a former death row inmate exonerated by DNA evidence; a former mayor of New Orleans; a senior California lawmaker; former FBI director William S. Sessions, and the head of the NAACP's Washington office. It was organized by a New York group, the Vera Institute of Justice.

Its staff director is Alexander Busansky, a former counsel to Sen. Russell Feingold (D-Wis.) and Justice Department attorney handling excessive-force cases involving corrections officers. Its financing comes from the Open Society Institute, three law firms and a philanthropic group, the JEHT Foundation.

< More Reaction to the Juvenile Death Penalty Ban | Blog Survey >
  • The Online Magazine with Liberal coverage of crime-related political and injustice news

  • Contribute To TalkLeft


  • Display: Sort:
    Re: Commission to Study U.S. Prison Conditions (none / 0) (#1)
    by wishful on Wed Mar 02, 2005 at 10:50:31 AM EST
    OK, now I guess I have to start believing in miracles.

    Re: Commission to Study U.S. Prison Conditions (none / 0) (#2)
    by Talkleft Visitor on Wed Mar 02, 2005 at 11:18:48 AM EST
    Hmm, seems a good thing, but it look like a bunch of people who go together and decided to make reccys after some meetings. How do they take this and build a mandate for change? Or even get access to non-public records? -C

    Re: Commission to Study U.S. Prison Conditions (none / 0) (#3)
    by Talkleft Visitor on Wed Mar 02, 2005 at 02:24:17 PM EST
    Both of you are right, its a joke but maybe a miracle will happen and maybe the gods will come back and make us all good little people. you will always of corruption and sinister people inside the system and outside its walls, because our elite want it like that.

    Re: Commission to Study U.S. Prison Conditions (none / 0) (#4)
    by Talkleft Visitor on Wed Mar 02, 2005 at 02:26:03 PM EST
    Oh yes, is this about the keepers or the kept?

    Re: Commission to Study U.S. Prison Conditions (none / 0) (#5)
    by Talkleft Visitor on Wed Mar 02, 2005 at 02:27:38 PM EST
    I think I should go to prison. -C

    Re: Commission to Study U.S. Prison Conditions (none / 0) (#6)
    by Talkleft Visitor on Wed Mar 02, 2005 at 02:53:39 PM EST
    You probably wouldn't like it, Cliff. I didn't. All those stories about "country club prisons" were lies. Here I was expecting golf every day, and they made me mow the lawn. Boy, was I disappointed!

    Re: Commission to Study U.S. Prison Conditions (none / 0) (#7)
    by Talkleft Visitor on Wed Mar 02, 2005 at 03:38:08 PM EST
    Oh sh!t, its the government and they are here to help us with our prisons.

    Re: Commission to Study U.S. Prison Conditions (none / 0) (#8)
    by Sailor on Wed Mar 02, 2005 at 04:08:13 PM EST
    I've always been amazed that the courts didn't consider anal rape to be 'cruel & unusual punishment'. dagma - the gov't runs the prisons, they are already there to 'help'. Did you ever think that maybe they should examine and re-examine their policies over time? Of course you didn't. Can you say troll? I thought you could.

    Re: Commission to Study U.S. Prison Conditions (none / 0) (#9)
    by Talkleft Visitor on Wed Mar 02, 2005 at 05:07:44 PM EST
    "More than 34,000 assaults were committed by prisoners against other inmates in a 12-month period covering parts of 1999 and 2000;" There are 3M prisoners in the country. 34,000 assault is around 1 assault per 100 prisoners in a 12 month period. So on average 99% of the prisoners were not assaulted in a 12 month period. Why is this a big problem? Considering we are talking about the worse kind of human population, I would consider this a pretty good statistics. I would submit that there are way better way to spend time and money than to worry about 1% of the prisoners, who are not modeled citizens anyway, got assaulted every year. Furthermore, it is not like the convicts who are doing the assaulting are not punished. I am sure they will have longer sentences or face solitary confinement. There are just so much you can do to reduce assault rate, particular in a population which consists of criminals.

    Re: Commission to Study U.S. Prison Conditions (none / 0) (#10)
    by scarshapedstar on Wed Mar 02, 2005 at 06:20:32 PM EST
    Finally. I find it pretty hard to criticize Saddam's rape rooms when prison rape is considered an acceptable and expected part of a prison term. We hear it on late night talk shows and from the mouths of California attorney generals. I wonder if Saddam announced it when people were raped.

    Re: Commission to Study U.S. Prison Conditions (none / 0) (#11)
    by Talkleft Visitor on Wed Mar 02, 2005 at 06:54:40 PM EST
    Uh, Scar, there's this one little point...Saddam's rape rooms were used by guards against political prisoners. We're talking about prisoners raping other prisoners. I'll admit than when you're on the receiving end it doesn't make much difference. But from an institutional side it does.

    Re: Commission to Study U.S. Prison Conditions (none / 0) (#12)
    by Talkleft Visitor on Thu Mar 03, 2005 at 04:41:04 AM EST
    Trueblue: Why do you assume that only prisoners rape prisoners?

    Re: Commission to Study U.S. Prison Conditions (none / 0) (#13)
    by Talkleft Visitor on Thu Mar 03, 2005 at 09:26:29 AM EST
    I think the point is that when American Prison Guards were sent as guards to Iraq, their idea of "business as usual" was found to be cruel and unusual. Their lack of accountability and the acceptance of abusive restraint and interrogation tactics have come under scrutiny. Most prisons are now being run "for profit", which makes the Chief Officers accountable to their shareholders, not to the prisoners, their families or to you and me, society. For Acme Prison Corp., recidivism means more profits. Additionally, with convicts unable to vote, the voices that would reform prisons are silenced. Anyone who advocates for prisoners being deprived of liberty -not life, not the pursuit of happiness - is vilified for being "pro-crime". So happy, but not optimistic about commission. BTW - Anyone who thinks the numbers of complaints by prisoners aren't grossly underrepresented is definitely out of touch. Try visiting one.

    Re: Commission to Study U.S. Prison Conditions (none / 0) (#14)
    by Talkleft Visitor on Thu Mar 03, 2005 at 10:13:15 AM EST
    For an alternative viewpoint, please see the two-part series I have just published here (Part 1), and here (Part 2).