home

When a Jihad is Not a Jihad

The New York terrorism trial of Yemini Sheik Mohammed Ali Hassan al-Moayad, who is accused of funneling money to Hamas and other militant organizations, took an interesting turn yesterday. Most Americans believe, in this post-9/11 world, that "jihad" means "holy war." But, as an expert witness testified at the trial yesterday, "jihad" has another meaning for Muslims. While on one hand, it can mean an armed struggle,

....it can also mean, as the defense prefers, the struggle for self-perfection and charitable work. "Anything that basically furthers the cause of Islam and is understood to be doing good," said the witness, Bernard Haykel, an associate professor of Islamic studies at New York University.

That was my understanding. I always thought the word Jihad had two meanings, one of which was synonymous with "effort" or "campaign"-- working hard for any good cause--as in a "jihad for mass education" or "jihad against Malaria." On a spiritual level, I thought Muslims viewed "jihad" as a concept having to do with an internal struggle against evil--the goal of which was self-purification.

The other, darker "jihad" is the one that fits the prosecution's theory of this terror trial, one of armed struggle and the battle against infidels. One in which the quest for self-purification is waged by martyrdom, such as suicide bombings.

So which version of jihad is on the tapes played to the jury in the Yemeni Sheik's trial?

Yesterday, aided by Dr. Haykel, who has written about and lived in Yemen, the defense put forth an alternative way of considering those tapes. He described the sheik's world in Yemen as a place remote from the lives of the New York jurors, where words and gestures may have different meanings.

Under questioning from a defense lawyer, William H. Goodman, Dr. Haykel described a grindingly poor country, divided over terrorism, where there is wide support for Palestinians and great skepticism of America.

For every sinister implication from the prosecutors, he gave the defense another way of explaining things. Young men at a mass wedding held by the sheik had appeared militant by carrying swords, in a videotape shown to the jurors. But such swords, he said, were common ceremonial accessories in Yemeni weddings.

As to helping Hamas,

Dr. Haykel took a swipe, too, at the prosecutors' accusation that the sheik's friendly ties to Hamas were incriminating. "There are a billion plus Muslims in the Arab world, 90 percent of whom support Hamas," he testified. "If they were all terrorists, we would be in dire trouble

The Prosecution did elicit from Dr. Haykel that jihad can mean war.

In answer to a question, Dr. Haykel conceded that whatever people in Yemen may think of Hamas, it is a group that kills civilians and says there is no room for compromise with Israel.

"Now jihad, " Mr. Knox said, "in that context means 'war'?"

"Correct," Dr. Haykel said.

The point I think the defense is making is that there are two very different meanings of jihad: The one that applies to the globalized war of holy terror espoused by Osama bin Laden and al-Zarqawi --and a kinder, gentler, spiritual version. Apparently, both have existed side by side for more than 1,000 years.

This New York jury will have to decide which version of jihad the Yemeni Sheik was supporting and funding.

< Abu Ali's Parents Protest Confinement Terms | Hunter Thompson's Wife : We Were On the Phone When it Happened >
  • The Online Magazine with Liberal coverage of crime-related political and injustice news

  • Contribute To TalkLeft


  • Display: Sort:
    Re: When a Jihad is Not a Jihad (none / 0) (#1)
    by Talkleft Visitor on Fri Feb 25, 2005 at 07:44:42 AM EST
    Oh, so jihad is like a New Year's Resolution. I get it.

    Re: When a Jihad is Not a Jihad (none / 0) (#2)
    by Talkleft Visitor on Fri Feb 25, 2005 at 08:01:14 AM EST
    Actually, if you read much about the internal struggle (feeble as it someteimes seems) then this discussion about jihad and what it means isn't anything new. OTOH, it's pretty clear what jihad that particular guy was thinking of. -C

    Re: When a Jihad is Not a Jihad (none / 0) (#3)
    by Ed Drone on Fri Feb 25, 2005 at 08:27:10 AM EST
    You'd think that the ones pushing these accusations might be ready to accept another meaning for "jihad" if it were translated to "kampf," for instance. Ed

    Re: When a Jihad is Not a Jihad (none / 0) (#4)
    by Talkleft Visitor on Fri Feb 25, 2005 at 08:35:56 AM EST
    Good post. IMHO, the single best translation for "jihad" is "crusade." The word captures the positive and the negative connotations all at once, as well as the history. Plus it's easy to explain to an english speaking audience that if you call for a "crusade against hunger," you're not trying to murder the restaurant vendors.

    Re: When a Jihad is Not a Jihad (none / 0) (#5)
    by Talkleft Visitor on Fri Feb 25, 2005 at 10:02:42 AM EST
    I believe there is a Jihad against Dissent in our very own country. We have the beginnings of our own Taliban. The terms i've chosen have a different reaction according to the readers perception.

    Re: When a Jihad is Not a Jihad (none / 0) (#6)
    by roy on Fri Feb 25, 2005 at 11:02:15 AM EST
    "There are a billion plus Muslims in the Arab world, 90 percent of whom support Hamas."
    Color me bigoted, but that's a scary figure to me (the 90%, not the billion). Does anybody know of documentation to back it up or refute it?

    Re: When a Jihad is Not a Jihad (none / 0) (#7)
    by Talkleft Visitor on Fri Feb 25, 2005 at 11:05:01 AM EST
    Why do people have trouble understanding this -- that "jihad" is pretty much exactly like "crusade"?

    Re: When a Jihad is Not a Jihad (none / 0) (#8)
    by Talkleft Visitor on Fri Feb 25, 2005 at 11:19:54 AM EST
    What about when Bush and business were Funnling money to the taliban and the heroin trade the primary sources of Al Qaeda's funding that our great Government was helping with and our government did a great job of it, until old Bin Laden got mad about his cut. read Paul L. William, Al Qaeda brotherhood of terror.

    Re: When a Jihad is Not a Jihad (none / 0) (#9)
    by Talkleft Visitor on Fri Feb 25, 2005 at 12:29:34 PM EST
    The little nruse with the purple birthmark brings me the papercup of pills to swallow. I know the Head Nurse is a she-Bush in starched white but if I go thru the motions they let me get online on the computer n the rec room can't stop me the unstoppable The Truth will get out there. Age has not deterrred me. I know the Truth about this so-called government of the United States. The Bushes and Saudis were in cahoots rubbing each others backsides until Bin Laden got mad about his cut of the lucre. That's a fact.

    Re: When a Jihad is Not a Jihad (none / 0) (#10)
    by Talkleft Visitor on Fri Feb 25, 2005 at 12:50:39 PM EST
    roy as far as I know HAMAS does have a strong number of supporters and sympathizers in the occupied terroritories. I doubt that 90% of the world's Muslims give their full and undying support to HAMAS but many empathize. HAMAS builds schools, feeds the hungry, and helps in the refugee camps. Unfortunately they build and use bombs too..

    Re: When a Jihad is Not a Jihad (none / 0) (#11)
    by Talkleft Visitor on Fri Feb 25, 2005 at 12:51:11 PM EST
    Crusade has historically been in reaction to jihad. As long as certain muslims indulge themselves in carnage as the primary expression of their devotion, we'll continue to identify jihad as being synonymous with indiscriminate slaughter.

    Re: When a Jihad is Not a Jihad (none / 0) (#12)
    by jondee on Fri Feb 25, 2005 at 02:43:20 PM EST
    Anybody heard about any color-coded terror alerts lately?