home

The FBI, Soldiers and Polygraphs

"Too Hot of a Potato: A Citizen Soldier's Encounter With the Polygraph" is a personal account of the life-changing consequences of wrongly failing an FBI polygraph examination -- and of a soldier's exercising his First Amendment right to speak publicly on polygraph policy. George Maschke was a soldier with a security clearance in the interrogations program. He served in the first Gulf War, was an Arab translator at interrogations and then had an opportunity to work with federal prosecutors on the World Trade Center bombing case. He decided to apply to the FBI to become an agent. Then the nightmare began:

On Monday, 15 May 1995, FBI polygrapher Jack Trimarco met me for the first time in his life and within three hours concluded that I am a spy, drug dealer, and drug abuser.

The FBI rejected my application to become an FBI special agent and entered my polygraph examiner's false accusations of deception into my permanent FBI Headquarters file. The FBI's accusations have had life-changing consequences for me, and I am telling my story to help hasten the day that our government ends its misplaced reliance on the pseudoscience of polygraphy, a practice it has with good reason prohibited the private sector from employing.

In 2000, Mr. Maschke and Gino Scalabrini co-founded AntiPolygraph.org and published The Lie Behind the Lie Detector, a free e-book with chapters on polygraph validity, policy, procedure, and countermeasures.

We included information on countermeasures not to help liars beat the system, but to provide the truthful with a means of protecting themselves against the random error associated with an invalid test.

It's a long, interesting article. Mr. Maschke concludes with:

Had I not chosen to exercise my First Amendment right to speak publicly on polygraph matters, I might today be serving with U.S. forces in the war on terror: the 902nd MI Group's polygraphers would not have judged me to be "too hot of a potato," and I might well have passed their polygraph and kept my security clearance.

But I have few regrets about having spoken out. In April 2001, I had the honor of speaking before the National Academy of Sciences' Committee to Review the Scientific Evidence on the Polygraph, and I find it gratifying that their final report, The Polygraph and Lie Detection, confirms AntiPolygraph.org's argument that polygraph screening has no scientific basis and that a misplaced reliance on it poses a danger to national security objectives. (It is deplorable that the U.S. Government has willfully ignored the conclusions of this report.)

I am not a spy. I have not betrayed the trust that my government placed in me. But I feel that my government has betrayed my trust -- and that of every citizen whose honesty and integrity it pretends to assess through the junk science of polygraph screening.

< New Medical Marijuana Store Opens | Blogging Monday >
  • The Online Magazine with Liberal coverage of crime-related political and injustice news

  • Contribute To TalkLeft


  • Display: Sort: