home

Fake Drug Checkpoints Upheld

Drug checkpoints are illegal. Fake drug checkpoints are not. So says the Colorado Court of Appeals.

Colorado police can set up fake checkpoints in hopes of sniffing out illegal drugs, an appeals court ruled in a case where camouflage-clad officers spied on fans during a bluegrass festival in 2000.

Police at the Telluride festival had posted signs along the road saying, "Narcotics checkpoint, one mile ahead" and "Narcotics canine ahead." Officers wearing camouflage hid on a hill and watched for any people who turned around or appeared to toss drugs out of their windows after seeing the signs. After Stephen Corbin Roth, 60, was pulled over for littering, police found a marijuana pipe and mushrooms while searching his car.

The appeals court said that while drug checkpoints are illegal -- because motorists are stopped at random and without reasonable suspicion of committing a crime -- the discovery of the pipe gave the officers probable cause to stop Roth's vehicle.

Indiana is doing it too. From Fourth Amendment.Com (scroll down to August 12):

News– Bogus checkpoints used to nab drug dealers from the Indianapolis Star (Aug. 8). Police set up a fake checkpoint on I-65 just to nab those who turned around or made an unsafe exit. There was no exit nearby, and the police used evasion as their PC to stop cars. So, Indiana police use a constitutional violation to arrest those seeking to avoid their unconstitutional conduct. This is mildly surprising considering Illinois v Lidster is pending before the Supreme Court (see Cert. grants) unless, of course, the police don't keep up with developments, which is more likely. (A letter to the editor published today in the same paper criticizes the paper for revealing the police misconduct: "It is a legal endeavor, so why not publish it afterward as a tribute to the commitment and ingenuity the police use to catch drug criminals in Indianapolis," instead of giving criminals a heads up? For some people, any sacrifice is not too great in the war on drugs, including sacrificing all our rights, just to nab one possessor of marijuana.) Police departments and citizens like this insure the guys like me will always have a job.

The Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals for Oklahoma has also okayed the practice. In U.S. v. Mack Flynn (309 F.3d 736; available free here) the Court held that for purposes of the Fourth Amendment, the creation of a ruse to cause a defendant to abandon an item is not illegal.

< Editorials Blast Ashcroft for Sentencing Memo | The Truth Behind the Blackout >
  • The Online Magazine with Liberal coverage of crime-related political and injustice news

  • Contribute To TalkLeft


  • Display: Sort: